I'm not screaming for it. The shows, games, etc, that don't have them are fine to do so. I'm just saying, to me personally, the products that don't have anything to do with them aren't for me. I even complimented Andor.
George Lucas created Star Wars solely to tell the story of Anakin Skywalker (Starkiller as he was originally meant to be called). His whole story and the Jedi and Sith revolving around it are Star Wars to the creator and the majority of fans. A product without any of that will always be less popular. The OG 6 could've just been called Skywalker 1-6 rather than Star Wars because it wasn't about the universe. It was about two specific characters.
Another example is like doing a Hogwarts movie with no Harry Potter (Fantastic Beasts was it called?). You can do it, and it may even be good, but some things/characters are just integral to a franchise.
There's nothing wrong with it, I know. I don't even blame them for doing it because they've wore out the appeal of the Jedi/Sith. That doesn't change the fact that, for a lot of us, that stuff is still a key part of what makes Star Wars what it is/was.
Well, I was only talking about Andor myself as I hadn't seen RO. I think two things can be true. Andor is the best thing Disney have done with SW in terms of writing, but it also didn't feel like SW, but a lot of people could take that as a compliment because SW is in such a state that not being able to liken it to the franchise is a compliment in and of itself.
I would take Andor any day over anything else they've produced that has Jedi in it. I'd just like both!