Suedesi
Full Member
Can't be arsed. You'll finish sixth.
Can't be arsed. You'll finish sixth.
I don't disagree that Pogba will make your midfield better and that a healthy Shaw (which is far from a certainty over the course of a season) will make your defense better. That would be silly. But let me ask you this....do you think it's possible that Spurs' defense and midfield also improve? Consistency as a team, another season of training under Pochettino, further grasping the system, young players maturing. Or is signing new players the only way to improve your team?People are saying many players are ahead of at least one of the players in that pair. That player could make all the difference especially considering that Pogba is going to be in the United team and I would be hard pressed to find a better midfielder than him in the PL. He will completely change the face of our MF and suddenly it will look better than yours.
Our defense was very good last season and we had Shaw out for almost the whole of last season. He was in terrific form until that time. So we will likely improve on that as well.
Yes you have a fantastic striker and a very good GK but all the top conpetitors and serious contenders have that.
Considering that there was just 4 points difference between 3rd and 5th place despite Spurs having such a finely balanced first 11 who were excellent last year, it is understandable why many people think that Spurs could easily finish outside the top 4.
I don't disagree that Pogba will make your midfield better and that a healthy Shaw (which is far from a certainty over the course of a season) will make your defense better. That would be silly. But let me ask you this....do you think it's possible that Spurs' defense and midfield also improve? Consistency as a team, another season of training under Pochettino, further grasping the system, young players maturing. Or is signing new players the only way to improve your team?
As for the last point, couldn't you just as easily say the opposite? That its perfectly understandable that Spurs could easily finish inside the top 4?
I guess my point is, and I've made it in the Spurs thread, that many people speak with all this certainty that United, Chelsea and City will be miles and miles better than they were last season (and it could be....we'll see) yet there seems to be no credence given to the sentiment that Spurs could also improve on last season's performances. Makes it seem like Spurs have surely hit their ceiling and there's no possible way they'll get any better. I just find that to be incredibly short sighted. But no worries. We have a whole season to see exactly how this will all play out. And it can't get here soon enough.
Well that's a reliefI don't disagree that Pogba will make your midfield better
Yeah seriously. Who needs a full post? I'll just keep it simple from now on.Well that's a relief
Damn, thread locked. Wrap it up.Leicester XI: Name 4 better Prem players in each position before the start of last season?
Not saying you have no chance of improving. Just pointing out that despite having probably one of your best seasons with all the usual contenders failing for one reason or the other, you didn't ever come close to challenging for the title seriously and finished very close to your average points finish over the last few years.I don't disagree that Pogba will make your midfield better and that a healthy Shaw (which is far from a certainty over the course of a season) will make your defense better. That would be silly. But let me ask you this....do you think it's possible that Spurs' defense and midfield also improve? Consistency as a team, another season of training under Pochettino, further grasping the system, young players maturing. Or is signing new players the only way to improve your team?
As for the last point, couldn't you just as easily say the opposite? That its perfectly understandable that Spurs could easily finish inside the top 4?
I guess my point is, and I've made it in the Spurs thread, that many people speak with all this certainty that United, Chelsea and City will be miles and miles better than they were last season (and it could be....we'll see) yet there seems to be no credence given to the sentiment that Spurs could also improve on last season's performances. Makes it seem like Spurs have surely hit their ceiling and there's no possible way they'll get any better. I just find that to be incredibly short sighted. But no worries. We have a whole season to see exactly how this will all play out. And it can't get here soon enough.
Edit:: also, Chelsea and Arsenal have fantastic strikers?? Who are these players of which you speak?!?
Obviously agree that we didn't come close to winning it. Yet some will say we bottled the title. What we did bottle was second. Had no business finishing below Arsenal. I think our young squad, which lacked depth, ran out of steam at the end and we produced some shocking results. If we had a bit more in the tank this might not have happened and Spurs would have finished more than 4 points ahead of United, but, again, ifs and buts as you say.Not saying you have no chance of improving. Just pointing out that despite having probably one of your best seasons with all the usual contenders failing for one reason or the other, you didn't ever come close to challenging for the title seriously and finished very close to your average points finish over the last few years.
While United was having a horrible season on many counts while being led by a dinosaur, we still came within 4 points of your points tally. Basically all that means is that you needed one poor game while we were one good result away from being above you. I know it is all ifs and buts - however the fact that you didn't really improve much on your average points tally tells me that Spurs aren't really all that despite all the hype.
My fault. I'll take it to the other Spurs thread.This has descended into another 'how good spurs really are' debate, hasn't it? I think the OP was quite clear, just name players who you think are better than the ones in the Spurs team in each position. How good Spurs season was last year, should really be for another thread, IMO.
Can't be arsed. You'll finish sixth.
My fault. I'll take it to the other Spurs thread.
We've signed Janssen from AZ to back up Kane. He played really well in our most recent friendly against Inter and I think he's an exciting prospect, but you just never know with players from the Eredivisie.Out of interest, you haven't made any big signings other than Wanyama, have you? Anyone being linked with you guys, who would improve the team further?
We've signed Janssen from AZ to back up Kane. He played really well in our most recent friendly against Inter and I think he's an exciting prospect, but you just never know with players from the Eredivisie.
We've been linked with N'koudou for awhile and I wouldn't be surprised if that deal was finalized in the near future. Again, more of a depth signing with good future potential as opposed to an immediate starter. His pace is much needed, but he wouldn't replace Lamela, Alli or Eriksen in the first 11.
Clyne at RB, Azpi at LB, Ozil at #10 and Aguero at CF. I'd even take Kane or Sturridge over (a 34 or 35 year old, not in his prime) Zlatan.If you made a premier league 11 only Alderweireld would get into it for me.
De Gea
Azpi - Alderweireld - Kompany - Shaw
Kante - Pogba
Mahrez - Payet - Sanchez
Zlatan
The OP is pointless. Why 4 in every position ? No sense to the question posed.Actually think that makes sense. You have a pretty good first XI. Its your bench that needs strengthening.
34 year old zlatan is still a much better player then either sturridge or Kane. Its not even close actually. If you were building a team with the future in mind then sure, but hes second only to Aguero in the premier league for strikers.Clyne at RB, Azpi at LB, Ozil at #10 and Aguero at CF. I'd even take Kane or Sturridge over (a 34 or 35 year old, not in his prime) Zlatan.
This thread is pretty flawed. As of now, our opinions on PL players stand as they were at the end of last season. Which obviously goes against the point of this being a "new" season. Teams are hugely influenced by new managers, new coaches the general tides of form over time and new team mates to play with.
I think Spurs have a good squad but a lot for them, in the absence of some bigger spending, deoends on how quickly the new managers can implement what they want. If Pep, Mourinho and co take time, Spurs can challenge foe the title again. If not, I see them as 3rd/4th place challengers.
34 year old zlatan is still a much better player then either sturridge or Kane. Its not even close actually. If you were building a team with the future in mind then sure, but hes second only to Aguero in the premier league for strikers.
We will see. I said RvP would flop the season after he won you the league (due to age and fitness) and was howled down on here. It could be the same this season for Zlatan, this is by far, physically, the toughest league he will have played in and he is already (at his age it's a given) on the downward slope. Kane was top scorer in the PL last season, he is already better than Zlatan in this league and Zlatan will have to prove otherwise. Sturridge has been injury-free for 8 months now, if he truly stays that way he could have a very good season because he is certainly capable.34 year old zlatan is still a much better player then either sturridge or Kane. Its not even close actually. If you were building a team with the future in mind then sure, but hes second only to Aguero in the premier league for strikers.
Your bias or mine ? Where's your list then ?Kane i can kind of understand but sturridge is a total pisstake
Clyne too. Only a liverpool supporter would put either near a best 11
We will see. I said RvP would flopp the season after he won you the league and was howled down. It could be the same this season for Zlatan, this is by far, physically, the toughest league he will have played in and he is already (at his age it's a given) on the downward slope. Kane was top scorer in the PL last season, he is already better than Zlatan in this league and Zlatan will have to prove otherwise. Sturridge has been injury-free for 8 months now, if he truly stays that way he could have a very good season because he is certainly capable.
So what ? (Balo I said could be but it was still a gamble). We all get predictions wrong - yes even you. That doesn't mean this one is wrong.You also said Benteke would be great for you and many more predictions about Balotelli.
So by that logic, if Ronaldo or Messi came to the league, kane would be better then them because they werent in the league last year? Bit of a shit argument. Ibrahimovic scored over 50 goals in all comps last season. I dont care how poor you say the french league is, its still over 50 goals and a total that no premier league player, not even aguero (because of injuries) would have reached.We will see. I said RvP would flopp the season after he won you the league and was howled down. It could be the same this season for Zlatan, this is by far, physically, the toughest league he will have played in and he is already (at his age it's a given) on the downward slope. Kane was top scorer in the PL last season, he is already better than Zlatan in this league and Zlatan will have to prove otherwise. Sturridge has been injury-free for 8 months now, if he truly stays that way he could have a very good season because he is certainly capable.
Clyne I can see, he is a pretty good player in a world of mediocre right backs. Sturridge is ridiculous though. He had one good season in his career where a large part was down to Suarez. Since then hes been either injured or a bit meh. Massively overrated player.Your bias or mine ? Where's your list then ?
So what ? (Balo I said could be but it was still a gamble). We all get predictions wrong - yes even you. That doesn't mean this one is wrong.
Do you go out of your way to make the top 10 worst posts on this site? Or are you just clueless?I think it's about time everyone accepts Spurs have a quality first team. They only lack a World Class player like Hazard, Ozil, Aguero but they're still the most complete team in the League.
Unlike United (midfield), Chelsea (defence), Arsenal (striker), City (defence) & Liverpool (defence & midfield) they have no real weaknesses as a unit. They have the best pair of fullbacks in the League, great GK, best CB partnership, above average CM partnership, above average attacking midfielders & a striker coming off of back to back 20 goal seasons.
Replace Eriksen with Hazard & everyone would say they're favourites for the title.
Can't be arsed. You'll finish sixth.