Badunk
Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Minimum of 52 years
The mother of one of the surviving children - "Child A" (surviving children can't be named due to a court order) - is now sharing some thoughts from her daughter.
Child A thought the attack was a prank and when Axel Rudakubana approached her with the knife, she told him she "didn't want one" - she "didn't want to play". Rudakubana then attacked her.
"Our world collapsed in that moment and we are still trying to rebuild it," the girl's mother says.
"When she woke up [from surgery] she lunged forward and reached her arms out - reaching for her best friend... still believing she was in danger, trying to get to her."
"They were separated in the most terrifying way," her mother adds.
Axel Rudakubana sentenced to minimum of 52 years in jail
Axel Rudakubana, 18, will be jailed for a minimum of 52 years, the judge says.
The judge says the sentences will run concurrently, meaning they will be served at same time.
He concludes that it is highly likely Rudakubana will never be released.
Got some some time off for being under 18 when he committed the offences, plus some more for his guilty plea.I just don't get it.
How is it not three life sentences? I hope he gets what he truly deserves in prison.
Well, he'll be (theoretically) 70 before he can be considered for parole, and I doubt he'll make it to 70.I just don't get it.
How is it not three life sentences? I hope he gets what he truly deserves in prison.
The parent statements are completely sobering, I can't even imagine the grief or how I could ever move on from it.
Wait what? You get less if you plead guilty?Got some some time off for being under 18 when he committed the offences, plus some more for his guilty plea.
Yeah evil feckers like him should have all their rights stripped away and if he wants to pull more crap like starving himself then they should just let him rot away and die a slow death. He's shown absolutely no remorse, in his sick mind he believes he's done something good. He's so far gone he's just not worth keeping alive.so for the next 52 years the tax payers have to feed and cloth that fecking evil piece of shit, 52 years making sure he is fed and kept warm and heathy!!!
feck that he should be put to death and done now before he costs us any more money, he deserves NOTHING , he should forfeit his right to live.
This boils my piss
For U18's the usual life sentence length starts at is 12 years so this is a lot more than usualI just don't get it.
How is it not three life sentences? I hope he gets what he truly deserves in prison.
Yes it is in the Sentencing Act. It does depend on when you plead guilty, and it can be offset by aggravating factors. I'll have a read of the sentencing remarks to see what impact it had.Wait what? You get less if you plead guilty?
The thing is, nothing that's around that we know of is enough of a punishment for him.Hang him.
I was quite surprised by how long the minimum was. I don't think I've ever seen one that's over 50 years. I guess that's got more to do with anyone who would be eligible for such a sentence would be given a whole life term instead and he can't be because of his age. There probably aren't many under 18s who have committed a crime that would usually have merited a whole life sentence .Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme request received for Axel Rudakubana
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...e-scheme-request-received-for-axel-rudakubana
That’s what I am wondering too. He wasn’t born inherently evil. So who groomed him and howI still want to know what the hell happened to him for this to happen. I hope we find out. Publish his entire internet history, his phone records. How does a monster like this end up being created?
The only other time was the Manchester bombers brother i heard, he got 55 years but was 22 I think.I was quite surprised by how long the minimum was. I don't think I've ever seen one that's over 50 years. I guess that's got more to do with anyone who would be eligible for such a sentence would be given a whole life term instead and he can't be because of his age. There probably aren't many under 18s who have committed a crime that would usually have merited a whole life sentence .
He was failed by social services.That’s what I am wondering too. He wasn’t born inherently evil. So who groomed him and how
That doesn’t answer the question thoughHe was failed by social services.
If I had to guess, severe mental illness plus unrestricted access to all sorts of dark shite on the internet.That doesn’t answer the question though
From his defence barrister:That doesn’t answer the question though
I'm in no way trying to explain his actions but there is definitely a problem in UK schools where you have young kids acting violently then being excluded and going to Pupil Referral Units. Pupils attending these are sometimes targeted by gangs, some for sexual exploitation, others for criminal exploitation. Others are just disturbed young minds that require major treatment.I still want to know what the hell happened to him for this to happen. I hope we find out. Publish his entire internet history, his phone records. How does a monster like this end up being created?
So his brief is arguing he doesn't have a mental problem to excuse his actions, I'd have thought he would have been arguing the opposite.From his defence barrister:
Stan Reiz KC, mitigating, told the court Rudakubana had appeared to have been a "normal child" until he reached 13.
Mr Reiz said: "There is no psychiatric evidence before the court that could suggest that a mental disorder contributed to the defendant's actions.
"However, he did make a transition from a normal, well-disciplined child to someone who was capable of committing acts of such shocking and senseless violence."
Not yet an answer, but an indication that this had been building for 4 years.
Thanks for the insight, deeply sad and troubling. So this is partly down to another Tory feck up? What a mess. Probably a lot more like him out there too.I'm in no way trying to explain his actions but there is definitely a problem in UK schools where you have young kids acting violently then being excluded and going to Pupil Referral Units. Pupils attending these are sometimes targeted by gangs, some for sexual exploitation, others for criminal exploitation. Others are just disturbed young minds that require major treatment.
However, if a kid is deemed too violent for the PRU then they can be left in limbo - left to study from home... not getting any education while they are "assessed" and "places sought" in various other oversubscribed options until they approach being 18 and can be ticked off the list of being the local education departments problem anymore.
I know the previous system of "borstals" and young offenders institutes had some tales of awful abuse but they were a place where lads like this could have been detained in a safer way. Leaving him with his parents was a total abdication of responsibility.
Kids are truly being left adrift at 16, or earlier if they get into trouble. This kid was referred multiple times...lots of people knew he was heading for a potentially horrendous violent outcome. Nothing was done.
"Care in the Community" is what was promised when the Tories dismantled the architecture we had in place around serious mental health and youth offending. In reality we have a mental health crisis using up the resources of Police, Ambulance and NHS and providing us with scant protection for when the wheels come off.
I was quite surprised by how long the minimum was. I don't think I've ever seen one that's over 50 years. I guess that's got more to do with anyone who would be eligible for such a sentence would be given a whole life term instead and he can't be because of his age. There probably aren't many under 18s who have committed a crime that would usually have merited a whole life sentence .
I'm in no way trying to explain his actions but there is definitely a problem in UK schools where you have young kids acting violently then being excluded and going to Pupil Referral Units. Pupils attending these are sometimes targeted by gangs, some for sexual exploitation, others for criminal exploitation. Others are just disturbed young minds that require major treatment.
However, if a kid is deemed too violent for the PRU then they can be left in limbo - left to study from home... not getting any education while they are "assessed" and "places sought" in various other oversubscribed options until they approach being 18 and can be ticked off the list of being the local education departments problem anymore.
I know the previous system of "borstals" and young offenders institutes had some tales of awful abuse but they were a place where lads like this could have been detained in a safer way. Leaving him with his parents was a total abdication of responsibility.
Kids are truly being left adrift at 16, or earlier if they get into trouble. This kid was referred multiple times...lots of people knew he was heading for a potentially horrendous violent outcome. Nothing was done.
"Care in the Community" is what was promised when the Tories dismantled the architecture we had in place around serious mental health and youth offending. In reality we have a mental health crisis using up the resources of Police, Ambulance and NHS and providing us with scant protection for when the wheels come off.
I still want to know what the hell happened to him for this to happen. I hope we find out. Publish his entire internet history, his phone records. How does a monster like this end up being created?