South Korean President declares martial law, accuses opposition | Martial law lifted

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
36,671
Weird development. Some saying it's a pre-emptive move because the president will get impeached.



BBC context:
This week, the opposition slashed budgets that the government and ruling party had put forward - and the budget bill cannot be vetoed.

In the same week, the opposition is moving to impeach cabinet members, mainly the head of the government audit agency, for failing to investigate the first lady.

Yoon has gone for the nuclear option - he claims it is to restore order when "anti-state" forces he says are trying to paralyse the country.
 
Last edited:
Urgh, my colleague just flew there today, so hope it's all ok.

On a sidenote, they seem to have loads of random protests in Seoul all the time.
 
So.... How often does something like this happen? Because my first instinct is that this is pretty bonkers, but I don't know enough about South Korea to say for sure...
 
So.... How often does something like this happen? Because my first instinct is that this is pretty bonkers, but I don't know enough about South Korea to say for sure...
I'm no expert... but I have seen the movie A Taxi Driver.

I don't think they've had martial law since the Gwangju Uprising and democratisation in the 80s.
 
I'm no expert... but I have seen the movie A Taxi Driver.

Hah, that's the first film that popped into my head! :lol: Good film!

I just read that the current president is very conservative and that his latest speech kind of suggests that he equates being liberal with supporting North Korea. In which case, this could get ugly :(
 
Some context from BBC:
This week, the opposition slashed budgets that the government and ruling party had put forward - and the budget bill cannot be vetoed.

In the same week, the opposition is moving to impeach cabinet members, mainly the head of the government audit agency, for failing to investigate the first lady.

Yoon has gone for the nuclear option - he claims it is to restore order when "anti-state" forces he says are trying to paralyse the country.
 
Well this should be interesting.

12m ago15.48 CET

Military announces suspension of all parliamentary activity - report​

The Yonhap News Agency is reporting that members of the national assembly have been banned from entering the building, with the South Korean military having reportedly announced the suspension of all parliamentary activity. We have not yet independently verified this information. The parliament speaker is traveling to parliament and plans to convene a session, according to local broadcaster YTN TV.
 
Well this should be interesting.

12m ago15.48 CET

Military announces suspension of all parliamentary activity - report​

The Yonhap News Agency is reporting that members of the national assembly have been banned from entering the building, with the South Korean military having reportedly announced the suspension of all parliamentary activity. We have not yet independently verified this information. The parliament speaker is traveling to parliament and plans to convene a session, according to local broadcaster YTN TV.
So it's a self coup or whatever the correct term is.
 
So.... How often does something like this happen? Because my first instinct is that this is pretty bonkers, but I don't know enough about South Korea to say for sure...
AI to the rescue!:

South Korea has declared martial law several times throughout its modern history, often in response to political crises, social unrest, or threats to national security. Here is an overview of key instances:

1. April 1948 (Jeju Uprising): Martial law was declared during the Jeju Uprising, a rebellion on Jeju Island against the government's suppression of leftist activities.


2. October 1948 (Yeosu-Suncheon Rebellion): Following a mutiny of soldiers in Yeosu and Suncheon who opposed suppressing the Jeju Uprising, martial law was declared to restore order.


3. April 1960 (April Revolution): Martial law was declared during protests against President Syngman Rhee's administration, which eventually led to his resignation.


4. May 1961 (Military Coup): Martial law was declared after a coup led by Park Chung-hee, who overthrew the civilian government and established military rule.

5. October 1972 (Yushin Constitution): Park Chung-hee declared martial law to dissolve the National Assembly and impose the Yushin Constitution, centralizing his power.

6. October 1979 (Assassination of Park Chung-hee): Martial law was declared following Park Chung-hee's assassination to maintain stability during the transition of power.

7. May 1980 (Gwangju Uprising): Martial law was expanded nationwide in response to pro-democracy protests, most notably the Gwangju Uprising, which was violently suppressed by the military.

The 1980 martial law and its associated events were particularly significant, as they marked the beginning of the Chun Doo-hwan regime. South Korea has not declared martial law since democratization in 1987, as the country transitioned to a stable democratic system.


Apparently AI hasn't kept up to date with today yet.
 
AI to the rescue!:

South Korea has declared martial law several times throughout its modern history, often in response to political crises, social unrest, or threats to national security. Here is an overview of key instances:

1. April 1948 (Jeju Uprising): Martial law was declared during the Jeju Uprising, a rebellion on Jeju Island against the government's suppression of leftist activities.


2. October 1948 (Yeosu-Suncheon Rebellion): Following a mutiny of soldiers in Yeosu and Suncheon who opposed suppressing the Jeju Uprising, martial law was declared to restore order.


3. April 1960 (April Revolution): Martial law was declared during protests against President Syngman Rhee's administration, which eventually led to his resignation.


4. May 1961 (Military Coup): Martial law was declared after a coup led by Park Chung-hee, who overthrew the civilian government and established military rule.

5. October 1972 (Yushin Constitution): Park Chung-hee declared martial law to dissolve the National Assembly and impose the Yushin Constitution, centralizing his power.

6. October 1979 (Assassination of Park Chung-hee): Martial law was declared following Park Chung-hee's assassination to maintain stability during the transition of power.

7. May 1980 (Gwangju Uprising): Martial law was expanded nationwide in response to pro-democracy protests, most notably the Gwangju Uprising, which was violently suppressed by the military.

The 1980 martial law and its associated events were particularly significant, as they marked the beginning of the Chun Doo-hwan regime. South Korea has not declared martial law since democratization in 1987, as the country transitioned to a stable democratic system.


Apparently AI hasn't kept up to date with today yet.
It's trained on at least a year old data.
 
Apparently you need 2/3 of the vote to declare martial law. What happens if the members are barred from voting? Is there some sort of deadline? And surely there is a stipulation that adds "... and you can't physically prevent members of the parliament from voting". Otherwise the law makes no sense!
 
Apparently you need 2/3 of the vote to declare martial law. What happens if the members are barred from voting? Is there some sort of deadline? And surely there is a stipulation that adds "... and you can't physically prevent members of the parliament from voting". Otherwise the law makes no sense!
Apparently he didn't need the vote since it just happened. Either that or it's completely unconstitutional and full military assisted coup.
 
Palace coup

Eh, sort of. It's just a coup I guess.
From wiki:
A self-coup, also called an autocoup (from Spanish autogolpe) or coup from the top, is a form of coup d'état in which a political leader, having come to power through legal means, stays in power through illegal means through the actions of themselves and/or their supporters.[1] The leader may dissolve or render powerless the national legislature and unlawfully assume extraordinary powers not granted under normal circumstances. Other measures may include annulling the nation's constitution, suspending civil courts, and having the head of government assume dictatorial powers.[2][3]

A palace coup or palace revolution is a coup in which one faction within the ruling group displaces another faction within a ruling group.[32] Along with popular protests, palace coups are a major threat to dictators.[33
 
Apparently he didn't need the vote since it just happened. Either that or it's completely unconstitutional and full military assisted coup.

I wonder if the president can declare martial law (in case of an actual emergency when time is of the essence), but the parliament can then override it.

But if the military then proceeds to block the vote then it makes zero sense.
 

Doesn't sound like the Korean won won.

the-s-impsons-bush.gif