Ixion
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2003
- Messages
- 15,275
Mega Drive > SNES
Zoroaster > Jesus.
Amiga >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything!
If that chicken headed company hadn't fecked it up. I'm still gutted.
The thing about the PC and the PS3, in my (somewhat amateurish) eyes is that, as Redlambs says, the PC has already surpassed what the PS3 can do to a certain extent.
And that's now, two years after the PS3's release. If, as you suppose Weaste, the PS3 will be around for ten more years, then it's only going to fall further and further behind PCs. Technology increases at an amazing rate, and things like gaming computers are always advancing. That they're already better just goes to show that they're going to keep pulling away. Think how far computers have come in the last ten years alone (although they have been slowing down somewhat in development speeds).
And as far as the Cell goes, what with it being the PS3's trump card over PCs and the XBox 360 -- don't you think someone else will come up with something similar very soon? Or, at least in the case of PCs, it's going to migrate there. I don't believe that, if it is so superior to the standard computer processor (and you seem to suggest it is), that other companies will sit idly by and allow it to be without trying to get in on the technology.
Or that IBM will see this as their chance to get back into the personal computer business by releasing it as a processor for gaming use. It's all money to be made, after all.
Sega Master System > anything pre 1990
Interesting take on it, I see what you are thinking. It's criminal the amount of people who own a HD machine don't have a t.v to suit. Also don't get me started on the bloody minded fools who claim they can't see a difference. Stevie Wonder and Arsene Wenger bloody could!
However again, my opinion is based purely on power. Consumers and developers always want more, and the second the PS3 and 360 were out of the door, you can bet your life Sony and M$ had dedicated teams looking to the next.
I know how some of you hate this type of thing, so I will not start a new thread, but in the absense of our resident number watcher, it seems that MGS4 has done its job well last month.
Nintendo DS 783k
Wii 667k
PlayStation 3 406k
PSP 337k
Xbox 360 220k
Playstation 2 189k
MGS4 itself sold 775,000 copies excluding hardware bundles.
Data is for USA.
And you are a fecking idiot as I've told you before.
I don't mind slight trolling, it's good, it's banter, but there comes a point where when actual facts go in one ear or eye and out of the other it becomes tiresome.
Nintendo DS 783k
Wii 667k
PlayStation 3 406k
PSP 337k
Xbox 360 220k
Playstation 2 189k
MGS4 itself sold 775,000 copies excluding hardware bundles.
Data is for USA.
Crazy that the PS2 sells that many units still!
June - thats when MGS4 was released no?. In that case the reason why Sony sold around 50k more PS3s is simply because it released its one-trick pony for 2008, Metal Gear Solid 4.
50k? What are you talking about?
just goes to show that technical superiority doesnt equate superior gaming.
June - thats when MGS4 was released no?. In that case the reason why Sony sold around 50k more PS3s is simply because it released its one-trick pony for 2008, Metal Gear Solid 4.
I can guarantee that the 360 will sell even more than the PS3 in October, with Gears of War 2 being released.
However I think you'd find that in the US, on a neutral month (that being a month in which no big exclusives are released within ~ +/- 3 months of the current month), the 360 will usually outsell the PS3.
You really think that DS has superior games do you? Cocking Mama? Brain Training? My Baby Girl? My Baby Boy? You could go on ad infinitum.
You're like a bluebottle.