- Joined
- Aug 21, 2021
- Messages
- 150
Maybe this belongs in another thread. But, I do think it is a big factor in how it went for Ole this fall.
In general, the players have to much power. They can down tools, do a bit of divide and concour in the dressing room and they can sit contracts out and still get fully paid — while they hold all the cards in the negotiations with the current and the suitor. In addition top clubs also needs to have very large squads, becouse there is nowhere to put them if they dont perform. And these big squads also locks down hugh funds.
All of these factors have negative implications on the club and the manager. It is also better to work with a fully fit squad of 20, than 40 — where the last half is either not performing or injured or are getting back from injury, or are moaning becouse they dont get play time.
I therefor think that the NHL modell with a farmer club is a much better structure for the PL.
In NHL they send players down to the farmer club where they only get 10% of their salary. This is the head coach decsision and it allows much better use of funds and it sets the «player power» in balance.
I’m not saying Ole would have sent Pogba or Lingaard or Andreas or Donny to the farmer club.
I’m just saying that he proably should have, and by just the fact that he could have — the squad would have been more in focus and professional. Hello Mcguire and Shaw.
Just a thought. When you are a «nice guy» like Ole you might need more tools than the bench to regulate the squad. Yes everybody is «happy», but how happy should things be? Would it not be better if all was responsibel (as an antidote to happy) for their own pay check, performance (other than starting XI) and status as a footballer?
In general, the players have to much power. They can down tools, do a bit of divide and concour in the dressing room and they can sit contracts out and still get fully paid — while they hold all the cards in the negotiations with the current and the suitor. In addition top clubs also needs to have very large squads, becouse there is nowhere to put them if they dont perform. And these big squads also locks down hugh funds.
All of these factors have negative implications on the club and the manager. It is also better to work with a fully fit squad of 20, than 40 — where the last half is either not performing or injured or are getting back from injury, or are moaning becouse they dont get play time.
I therefor think that the NHL modell with a farmer club is a much better structure for the PL.
In NHL they send players down to the farmer club where they only get 10% of their salary. This is the head coach decsision and it allows much better use of funds and it sets the «player power» in balance.
I’m not saying Ole would have sent Pogba or Lingaard or Andreas or Donny to the farmer club.
I’m just saying that he proably should have, and by just the fact that he could have — the squad would have been more in focus and professional. Hello Mcguire and Shaw.
Just a thought. When you are a «nice guy» like Ole you might need more tools than the bench to regulate the squad. Yes everybody is «happy», but how happy should things be? Would it not be better if all was responsibel (as an antidote to happy) for their own pay check, performance (other than starting XI) and status as a footballer?