Kakeru
New Member
Can we just eliminate that already? I just don't give a feck anymore; please, get rid of that formation already.
People keep putting Mata in their 433 formations.........I have no doubt LVG will switch to 433 soon and when it happens Mata will spend most of the season on the bench....I can never see him having a future at this club....Rooney will drop deeper in midfield if we switch to 433....with Valencia, RVP and Di Maria as a front 3
Why can't Mata fit into a 433.A 433 usually has a No.10 type player and he is easily our best No.10 so I don't understand why people don't think he can fit in.People keep putting Mata in their 433 formations.........I have no doubt LVG will switch to 433 soon and when it happens Mata will spend most of the season on the bench....I can never see him having a future at this club....Rooney will drop deeper in midfield if we switch to 433....with Valencia, RVP and Di Maria as a front 3
Do you think he will have De Maria in the Robben Role?
Feasibly I suppose, but I think with Herrara out for a few weeks it's more likely we'd see Di Maria in CM than CF if we did stick with 352 (because the latter would mean dropping Rooney or Van Persie and leaving Cleverley on the pitch)
Personally I'd prefer a diamond:
Rooney - Van Persie
Mata
Herrara ------- Di Maria
Carrick
Shaw - Rojo - Smalling - Rafael
DDG
This was suggested in the Di Maria thread as well, and is by far my preferred option if we seal the Di Maria deal.Feasibly I suppose, but I think with Herrara out for a few weeks it's more likely we'd see Di Maria in CM than CF if we did stick with 352 (because the latter would mean dropping Rooney or Van Persie and leaving Cleverley on the pitch)
Personally I'd prefer a diamond:
Rooney - Van Persie
Mata
Herrara ------- Di Maria
Carrick
Shaw - Rojo - Smalling - Rafael
DDG
The goal of this formation, as with any other, is to get the best out of the best players. If there's another option that is more likely to do that, it doesn't matter if we've worked on it for five years. It's just numbers on a paper anyways, and what really matters is the roles you assign the players.Yeah let's bin a formation we've worked on for weeks and haven't seen our fully fit first XI play, the state of some you lot. How the feck can we go 4 at the back right now and risk isolating the likes of Keane and Blackett? Wait until everyone is fit and let's see.
The goal of this formation, as with any other, is to get the best out of the best players. If there's another option that is more likely to do that, it doesn't matter if we've worked on it for five years. It's just numbers on a paper anyways, and what really matters is the roles you assign the players.
And I couldn't give a toss about Blackett and Keane, if extending them chances in the first team impede on our chances of getting fourth. They've done well in pre season, and today (bar Keane's black out in the box), and if they are good enough they will push through. And given that we are United, and it's mandatory for us to have at least three centre backs injured at all times, they'll get plenty of opportunities anyways.
Can we just eliminate that already? I just don't give a feck anymore; please, get rid of that formation already.
What? The bolded parts make sense in relation to the points I've been making above.You can not give a toss all you want, we have no other CB's available and we aren't going to finish 4th. This formation was built to get the best out that front 3 and they haven't performed, yet.
The goal of this formation, as with any other, is to get the best out of the best players. If there's another option that is more likely to do that, it doesn't matter if we've worked on it for five years. It's just numbers on a paper anyways, and what really matters is the roles you assign the players.
And I couldn't give a toss about Blackett and Keane, if extending them chances in the first team impede on our chances of getting fourth. They've done well in pre season, and today (bar Keane's black out in the box), and if they are good enough they will push through. And given that we are United, and it's mandatory for us to have at least three centre backs injured at all times, they'll get plenty of opportunities anyways.
What? The bolded parts make sense in relation to the points I've been making above.
You're right about the fact that we won't finish 4th, we'll probably come in at 3rd when all is said and done. We just need to find some momentum and build some confidence.
I interpreted your post as stating that we should keep three centrally in defense because we needed to ensure that Keane and Blackett was afforded chances. If the intended meaning was otherwise, I apologize. But the point of my response was that we shouldn't adapt our system to make sure that they get matches. Next week we'll have Rojo and Jones (knock on wood) ready to play CB.You said you couldn't give a toss about Keane or Blackett, which is all very well but they are 2 of our 3 available (soon 4/5) CB's, so right now we can't play 4 at the back. And you also said formations are supposed to get the best out of our players, well how else can we get can sufficient defensive protection with our porous midfield and get our front three of RVP, Mata and Rooney in their best positions?
I interpreted your post as stating that we should keep three centrally in defense because we needed to ensure that Keane and Blackett was afforded chances. If the intended meaning was otherwise, I apologize. But the point of my response was that we shouldn't adapt our system to make sure that they get matches. Next week we'll have Rojo and Jones (knock on wood) ready to play CB.
And the answer to your second question is in the posts above, the one I quoted and the little essay I posted. When we're playing teams like Sunderland who drop deep the focus shouldn't be on offering protection to our three centre backs, as they are protecting each other, but how we can offer support to the front three in order to break down the opponent.
As for the diamond in the post I quoted, you're playing with two traditional full backs there, which means that both full backs do not bomb forward (past the midfield) at the same time, which again leaves us with three defenders to keep the balance just as the 5-3-2 (or 3-5-2 as the title here says).
Anyways, I'm not inherently opposed to the 5-3-2 / 3-5-2 / 3-4-1-2 / whatever you wish to call it, I just think that if we bring in Di Maria the diamond would be a better fit if we're insisting on keeping two strikers on. But I made an essay saying what's wrong with how we're playing in the current formation above, and I'm certain it could work if we're able to sort it out.
The way we've been playing these two matches the outer CB are not offering any support at all to the wing backs / wingers, which is a huge problem so long as we have midfielders completely incapable of doing just that. I do not think that the CBs are instructed to do that though in this current system. They only seem to step out of the line when on the ball, and even then we don't have enough movement in front of them to allow them to take advantage of the space in front of them.This back three thing isn't as defensive as I think you think it is. Two outer CB's can push up with cover and bring the ball up, wing-back's are pretty much supposed to be wingers hence Valencia and Young playing there. We just aren't executing the vision for a variety of reasons.
You'll put those players in 4-3-3 and have the same kind of shit played as today. It's not the system or it's principles, it's the players that are not executing tasks handed to them by the manager.
Completely agree.
The 3-5-2 isn't why Fletcher and Cleverley were thoroughly incapable of asserting themselves or capable of creating chances, they just played poorly. In general we lacked leadership, intent and a willingness to play progressively and take risks.
Those issues do not stem from the system we elect to play and they were all problems evident last season under Moyes when we played four at the back.
Forget this narrow shit, we need to hit the next game with Januzaj and Di Maria on the flanks. We just cannot play through the centre
This is my preferred formation too. If we can get a proper defensive midfielder in who is willing to get stuck in and has pace as well it will be even better. But from the rubbish we have in midfield right now, Carrick looks like the best option.Feasibly I suppose, but I think with Herrara out for a few weeks it's more likely we'd see Di Maria in CM than CF if we did stick with 352 (because the latter would mean dropping Rooney or Van Persie and leaving Cleverley on the pitch)
Personally I'd prefer a diamond:
Rooney - Van Persie
Mata
Herrara ------- Di Maria
Carrick
Shaw - Rojo - Smalling - Rafael
DDG
I would actually like to see us transition to a 3-4-3 which essentially breaks down into a 2-1-4-2-1 formation and can easily switch to a traditional 4-3-3 formation and our current 3-5-2 formation.
---------------GK--------------
------RCB-------------LCB-------
--------------CDM--------------
RWB------CM------CM------LWB
-----RAM--------------LAM-----
---------------SP---------------
Transition to 4-3-3
RWB=>RB
LWB=>LB
RAM=>RW
LAM=>LW
Transition to 3-5-2
CDM=>CB
RAM=>CAM
LAM=>SP
The way I'd play it:
----------------DDG-----------------
--------Jones-----------Rojo--------
---------------Carrick---------------
Rafael-----Herrera--Di Maria------Shaw
-------Mata--------------Januzaj
----------------RVP-----------------