Iker Quesadillas
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
- Messages
- 5,154
- Supports
- Real Madrid
The other reason why CR7 might not be considered Real Madrid's player is that he simply did not like Real Madrid that much.
Oh i didn't say that at all, di estefano is obviously a goat level player im not taking that away from him(neither Messi or Ronaldo are my goat i give that to Diego armando)
Di estefano will obviously always live on but I'm afraid his legacy will be severely diminished by the mere fact that he didn't play in a world cup.
His name will only live on for the diehard Madrid fans and football nerds, hell im pretty sure your average Madrid fan couldn't name him and that is a shame.
Again these rankings are decided by fine margins , very fine margins and here we reach another problem, we can't base player evaluations on the descriptions given.How do we define better from a playing standpoint, though? At his peak, Cristiano was a a near unparalleled scorer, probably the greatest offensive header of the ball, and things of that nature — no doubt one of the finest to grace the sport, and an incredible competitor. But Di Stéfano had a massive overall impact on his teams as he would orchestrate the tempo of the game, organize his team-mates, occupy different positions across the pitch (like a quintessential total footballer), work his bollocks off in a defensive sense, and also dribble and score. There's definitely an argument to be made about Cristiano being a superior specialist in certain forward roles, but Di Stéfano is probably the most complete footballer of all time when you consider his overpowering influence on every facet (and not just goalward contributions).
“I watched him in a match when Manchester United played against Real in the semi-final of the European Cup in Madrid the year before the accident. In those days, there was no substitutes' bench; if you weren't playing, you were in the stand. I felt like I was looking down on what looked like a Subbuteo table—I was that high up—but I couldn't take my eyes off this midfield player and I thought, Who on earth is that?
He ran the whole show and had the ball almost all the time. I used to dream of that, and I used to hate it when anyone else got it. They beat us 3-1 and he dictated the whole game. I'd never seen anything like it before—someone who influenced the entire match. Everything went through him. The goalkeeper gave it to him, the full backs were giving it to him, the midfield players were linking up with him and the forwards were looking for him.
And there was Gento playing alongside and Di Stefano just timed his passes perfectly for him. Gento ran so fast you couldn't get him offside. And I was just sitting there, watching, thinking it was the best thing I had ever seen.
But I had been forewarned a bit by Matt Busby, the manager at the time, because he had been across and seen them play a match in Nice before the semi—in those days it wasn't easy to do that—and, when he came back, we asked him what they were like, but he didn't want to tell us. And I understood why he didn't when I saw them. I think he knew that, if he had said they were the best players he'd ever seen, it would have been all over for us before we'd started. And this was when Di Stefano was thirty. What must he have been like in his youth?”
I don't think the chance is that high.
You make a fair point, Ronaldo has a massive market appeal and name recognition so that alone would insure him to be remembered in a very long time, definitely will be remembered in his home country.How do you come to that conclusion? We know that Di Stefano names and legend has travelled through time, if anything you should make that point for Messi and Ronaldo but not for the man who is being talked about in 2022 when the peak of his career was in the 50s.
There is a real chance that someone like Ronaldo end up being remembered as a modern Gert Muller and not as high as he currently is.
You make a fair point, Ronaldo has a massive market appeal and name recognition so that alone would insure him to be remembered in a very long time, definitely will be remembered in his home country.
Again lack of wc participation severely harms di Stéfano's name recognition as I don't think that many Argentinians know him more than they do compared to their other greats.
Footballing historians will obviously have a much different perception compare to your average fan so his name will obviously live on there.
It may be anecdotal but from my experience most people don't know him much, someone like eusebio (due to his 1966 world cup) or even Paulo rossi (who doesn't even belong in the goat tier) has greater name recognition in those who I've interacted with and these are mostly guys who know their football .I really don't get this point, how does it hurt him when he is routinely named among the all time greats despite being one of the oldest recognisable legends? You make that point as if Di Stefano wasn't currently recognized. It's pretty clear that it didn't hurt him during the past 70 years.
I think the situations are a bit different although I can only go by what I read. Muller won the Ballon d'Or once. His teammate Beckenbauer won it twice, and won more Bundesliga player of the year awards. His other teammate Karl-Heinz Rummenige also won it twice. His opponent in the WC final, Johan Cruyff, won it three times. It seems clear to me that he was overshadowed by other players even in his generation.We don't know how players travel through time, you and I have Ronaldo at the top of our minds because he represents our generation but that's only true for our generation.
I think the situations are a bit different although I can only go by what I read. Muller won the Ballon d'Or once. His teammate Beckenbauer won it twice, and won more Bundesliga player of the year awards. His other teammate Karl-Heinz Rummenige also won it twice. His opponent in the WC final, Johan Cruyff, won it three times. It seems clear to me that he was overshadowed by other players even in his generation.
It may be anecdotal but from my experience most people don't know him much, someone like eusebio (due to his 1966 world cup) or even Paulo rossi (who doesn't even belong in the goat tier) has greater name recognition in those who I've interacted with and these are mostly guys who know their football .
Its important to remember that for a long time the only outlet to watch the biggest stars play the game was the world cup most people didn't even know abouts the European Cup or any European club competition to be honest.
This is a football forum with an inarguably eurocentric bent so it may not look like that to your eyes.
Agreed. Cunningham was the first Madrid player to get a standing ovation at the camp nou afaik.Thanks for sharing. They got most of the names right but it seems a bit random. Rial is very low, Beckham shouldn't be and maybe Mac Manaman either.
If they want to include an Englishman I think it should be Cunningham, much loved by the people.
No way Figo above Modric and Di Stefano> Cristiano
He very much was actually. The difference between real madrid and the others was Di Stefano. Every other big club of the time had players of similar quality of ours besides him. And he was the team. The man wasn't just the best player in the world/europe, he changed the club's entire culture and the team's culture. He changed the way we trained, the way we played, everything. Until Muñoz he was basically the team's actual manager too. Everything, and i mean, everything, went through himFirst time I'm seeing people rate do estefano higher so was taken back.
Also that 50s early 60s team was packed its not like di estefano was the only one dragging them along.
To the average real madrid fan Di Stefano is GodHis name will only live on for the diehard Madrid fans and football nerds, hell im pretty sure your average Madrid fan couldn't name him and that is a shame.
You have a very high expectation of average Madrid fans football knowledge, but yeah to anyone who knows him he must be.Agreed. Cunningham was the first Madrid player to get a standing ovation at the camp nou afaik.
He very much was actually. The difference between real madrid and the others was Di Stefano. Every other big club of the time had players of similar quality of ours besides him. And he was the team. The man wasn't just the best player in the world/europe, he changed the club's entire culture and the team's culture. He changed the way we trained, the way we played, everything. Until Muñoz he was basically the team's actual manager too. Everything, and i mean, everything, went through him
The only figure comparable is Bernabeu himself
To the average real madrid fan Di Stefano is God
You think the average manchester united fan doesn't know Bobby Charlton?You have a very high expectation of average Madrid fans football knowledge, but yeah to anyone who knows him he must be.
Puskas was old, fat, and joined in '58. While still an amazing player, he wasn't really better than the likes of Kubala, Suarez, Fontaine, Liedholm, etc anymore. Gento, again, all time great, but there were others of his level at others clubs. Same for Kopa too.Your also definitely underselling some of the other players here, I'm pretty sure not every team had a puskas or gento in their ranks.
Unfortunately after being aquiqnted to the cesspool that is twitter, no I don't think they do.You think the average manchester united fan doesn't know Bobby Charlton?
Puskas was old, fat, and joined in '58. While still an amazing player, he wasn't really better than the likes of Kubala, Suarez, Fontaine, Liedholm, etc anymore. Gento, again, all time great, but there were others of his level at others clubs. Same for Kopa too.
Oh, and he's the reason we signed Puskas in the first place, too. Bernabeu thought he was too fat and unfit, Di Stefano told him it didn't matter
There is not an even one casual football fan in Spain who doesn't know Alfredo Di Stefano. Or Italy for that matter. Or ArgentinaUnfortunately after being aquiqnted to the cesspool that is twitter, no I don't think they do.
Sir Bobby at least has the luxury of being part of a world cup winning side in a very football heavy nation (their only title at that ) so probably has more name recognition due to that.
Nice bit of history about puskas , didn't know about it.
I hope you're right, because what I read on the internet doesn't Instill me with much confidence.There is not an even one casual football fan in Spain who doesn't know Alfredo Di Stefano. Or Italy for that matter. Or Argentina
I hope you're right, because what I read on the internet doesn't Instill me with much confidence.
Before Cristiano joined Real Madrid they were the biggest club in the world and when he left them they were still the biggest club in the world.
Not to diminish his legacy but Ronaldo did not make Real Madrid what they are today, he's a great contributor and the best individual player they've ever hard no doubt.
But Alfredo Di Stefano is the one who made Real Madrid the biggest club in the world, without him Ronaldo wouldn't have done everything to leave a dominant Man Utd side who had made back to back CL finals to join a Madrid side that was getting knocked out of the CL in the RO16 every year
Yeah, but its impossible to recreate history, isn't it?
Nobody can ever be bigger than Di Stefano for RM, unless we talk about some wild future where the club literally collapse and someone has to come in and save us from ruins, and even then probably not.
Benzema's CL season so far is better than anything Ronaldo has done, except for 2017, which is somewhat equal. The number of goals, the variety, the importance of the goals, it's amazing. His overall play has been better than Ronaldo too. Ronaldo a better player overall for Real Madrid, but just for one-off seasons, Benzema is having an all-timer.
Damn, it actually made sense!And according to me, you could have just said 'Benzema unless Liverpool do the double' and saved a lot of people a headache.
Kopa? He'd be lucky to make a top-10, no? Immense at his peak but his impact on Madrid's history was minimal compared to players like Gento, Modrić, Raúl etc. Did he even play 100 games for them?The top 5 should be easy enough:
Di Stefano, Ronaldo, Puskas, Kopa, Zidane*.
*Zidane is the questionable one for me, I don't really know why he would be above Raul or Modric.
Kopa? He'd be lucky to make a top-10, no? Immense at his peak but his impact on Madrid's history was minimal compared to players like Gento, Modrić, Raúl etc. Did he even play 100 games for them?
The difference that the World Cup makes to Di Stefano's legacy is more about the gap between him being a top 5 or so player of all time compared to the top 10-15. As the generation who saw him die out, I think what will harm his legacy is how little of his career was on TV. Compared to the likes of Meazza and Zizinho before him, there's enough to make him reasonably credible, but not enough to really get a sense of how good he is when you compare him to players just a few years younger like Pele, Best and Eusebio.It may be anecdotal but from my experience most people don't know him much, someone like eusebio (due to his 1966 world cup) or even Paulo rossi (who doesn't even belong in the goat tier) has greater name recognition in those who I've interacted with and these are mostly guys who know their football .
Its important to remember that for a long time the only outlet to watch the biggest stars play the game was the world cup most people didn't even know abouts the European Cup or any European club competition to be honest.
This is a football forum with an inarguably eurocentric bent so it may not look like that to your eyes.
Yeah exactly, I have a gauge of just how good eusebio was but can't say the same about Alberto, there really isn't much for di stefano aside from peer glorification and his 2 ballon d'or triumphs.The difference that the World Cup makes to Di Stefano's legacy is more about the gap between him being a top 5 or so player of all time compared to the top 10-15. As the generation who saw him die out, I think what will harm his legacy is how little of his career was on TV. Compared to the likes of Meazza and Zizinho before him, there's enough to make him reasonably credible, but not enough to really get a sense of how good he is when you compare him to players just a few years younger like Pele, Best and Eusebio.
finally. someone on here is able to produce a clear and concise graphic that even the layperson can follow.
Only a graphic can show how overwhelmingly is Benzema the favorite for Balon d'Or.Bro you could have just said Benzema has got it in the bag unless Liverpool win the PL and CL.
Benzema's CL season so far is better than anything Ronaldo has done, except for 2017, which is somewhat equal. The number of goals, the variety, the importance of the goals, it's amazing. His overall play has been better than Ronaldo too. Ronaldo a better player overall for Real Madrid, but just for one-off seasons, Benzema is having an all-timer.
I think he was strictly referring to CL seasons. Overall, there are a number of seasons Ronaldo had at Madrid that eclipses Benzema’s current one (as good as Benzema has been).Gonna have to disagree there, Ronaldo had 61 goals and 21 assists (21 assists!) in 2014/15 on a team that won absolute zero despite him performing valiantly all season. It's easy to forget what the guy was doing year in, year out, in RM.
I have no qualms with putting this Benzema's season on par with any of Ronaldo's season though. It's not because he has 41 goals instead of 50 or 60 that I'd put it not on par, I just wouldn't say it's better than every single season Ronaldo's had either. He's been as fundamental as Ronaldo's seasons this year, and it's been great to watch, and a big slap in the face for everyone that dismissed Benzema for an entire decade while he was already world class, baring 1 or 2 seasons.
If he wins Ballon D'Or it'll be fully deserved.
I think he was strictly referring to CL seasons. Overall, there are a number of seasons Ronaldo had at Madrid that eclipses Benzema’s current one (as good as Benzema has been).
Benzema has scored more goals (9) this season in knock-out games than Messi in the last 10 seasons combined (8).
Messi's goal scoring record leave a lot to be desired in the knockout rounds, even though he is the second best scorer of all time in there.
Maybe they man marked him too much?
Ahh so you back tracked you little WeaselIt's a fake twit which tried to fool us Messi admirers. Don't believe it not even for one second.
Gravesen probably gets in to be fair.