Some players' status as the numero uno of their club is quite simply untouchable: Di Stéfano for Madrid, Beckenbauer for Bayern, Pelé for Santos, Cruyff for Ajax, Maradona for Napoli, and so forth. Surface level stats aren't the be-all and end-all when it comes to the Di Stéfano vs Cristiano argument for two primary reasons:
- Madrid's game ran through Di Stéfano whereas Cristiano was a goal-scorer who was a tertiary figure in build-ups. With that in mind, the former's record of 308 goals in 396 matches becomes even more impressive.
- Only one of them redefined what Madrid was on a fundamental level, and changed the nature and expectations of the institution — that is something raw statistics can't quite capture.
When Di Stéfano arrived at the club, they trailed Barcelona, Athletic Club, Valencia and Atlético for league titles and were non entities on a global level — by the time he left, they were most successful club in Spain, and the continent as a whole (by some distance at that). Easily the most important figure in Madrid's history with Santiago Bernabéu; the first and greatest Galáctico. There's no shame in Cristiano being #2, he couldn't have surpassed Di Stéfano no matter what he did — just as no one will surpass Beckenbauer for Bayern, Pelé for Santos or Cruyff for Ajax.
P.S. Zidane at #3 in that Four Four Two list is really weird. Not sure he is even the greatest French player to represent Madrid, let alone a greater figure for the club than Puskás, Gento, Pirri and the likes.