ShinjiNinja26
Full Member
Ratcliffe ain’t the guy. The sooner he rules himself out the better and we can move on to the serious players.
It's not just the £5bn or £6bn to buy the club , but to buy the club and then spend another 2 to 3 billion upgrading the stadium and infrastructure.£5B is not overpaying, when you consider what Chelsea went for.
And, concentrating on Nice, several weeks ago, has nothing to do with the situation unfolding this week.
Ratcliffe ain’t the guy. The sooner he rules himself out the better and we can move on to the serious players.
It's not just the £5bn or £6bn to buy the club , but to buy the club and then spend another 2 to 3 billion upgrading the stadium and infrastructure.
It absolutely should be an issueWhy is their ownership track record at Nice being waved away? Why shouldn't it be a potential concern?
It's not just the £5bn or £6bn to buy the club , but to buy the club and then spend another 2 to 3 billion upgrading the stadium and infrastructure.
It's not just the £5bn or £6bn to buy the club , but to buy the club and then spend another 2 to 3 billion upgrading the stadium and infrastructure.
I think that's more money than he has altogether.
Yeah easily at least £10bn
His company is worth 60bn.
He owns 2/3’s of it.
You guys do realise that Musk’s ”wealth” isn’t cash in the bank but based on his shareholdings?
I have to wonder if those saying Radcliffe doesn’t have the means to takeover are confusing him with Knighton. It’s seems odd that so many are suddenly against him when he was our darling a few months back.
It doesn’t add up that he made a bit for Chelsea after the bid deadline, so late that they had already named a preferred bidder. Seems like attention seeking.He definitely puts his name to all these club takeovers for PR purposes. He's not a serious bidder in my opinion.
It's going to be American again or Middle Eastern money.
Absolute nonsensical figure plucked out of the sky.
I'm not saying it's going to cost in excess of 2 billion, but rather the reports state that the cost could exceed 2 billion. And I doubt Ratcliffe has the capital to beat out the competition to buy Man Utd.Madrid are spending 700m dollars on their renovations, no way in a million years is anyone sinking 2-3 billion on OT & infrastructure man. That’s pie in the sky stuff that even oil money wouldn’t spend.
How much do you see us sold for then,that figure includes renovations by the way
I'm not saying it's going to cost in excess of 2 billion, but rather the reports state that a the cost could exceed 2 billion. And I doubt Ratcliffe has the capital to beat out the competition to buy Man Utd.
Tbh with you, we have to factor in the infrastructure cost and clearing the debt on top of what the Glazers want for their shares.I think that's more money than he has altogether.
In any case, I was responding to your post. Now you've moved the goalposts.
There are limits to what you could do and how quickly you could do it, unless someone came in and immediately bought up new land for a new stadium and training ground and started building from scratch it wouldn't be possible to spend £2bn in a short time frame. You're looking at a billion, including investment in the squad, if we're talking upgrading current facilities and not total rebuilds at new locations.I'm not saying it's going to cost in excess of 2 billion, but rather the reports state that the cost could exceed 2 billion. And I doubt Ratcliffe has the capital to beat out the competition to buy Man Utd.
I'm of a similar opinion to Gary Neville and think we should look to build a new 90,000 seater stadium. And for that to be a realistic possibility, we need major investment which will also need to be need to filter down to the recruitment side of the club.Totally agree there are gonna be some serious players willing to come to the table now
I'm of a similar opinion to Gary Neville and think we should look to build a new 90,000 seater stadium. And for that to be a realistic possibility, we need major investment which will also need to be need to filter down to the recruitment side of the club.
I don't personally care how long it takes, as long as the plans are put in place to upgrade the club to a very high standard. We've waited a long time to see the light at the end of the tunnel as far as the current owners are concerned, I'm sure we can be patient and see the possible development unfold in the next 5 years or so.There are limits to what you could do and how quickly you could do it, unless someone came in and immediately bought up new land for a new stadium and training ground and started building from scratch it wouldn't be possible to spend £2bn in a short time frame. You're looking at a billion, including investment in the squad, if we're talking upgrading current facilities and not total rebuilds at new locations.
How much do you see us sold for then,that figure includes renovations by the way
Probably unrealistic, but I'd be intrigued to see what Apple could do with the club.Which potential buyers would you class as major investment just out of interest
Probably unrealistic, but I'd be intrigued to see what Apple could do with the club.
That the time frame I'm talking about, there's not actually that much to a football club outside of the squad to pump money into. Once you've upgraded the facilities you're basically waiting for technology to make a significant leap to upgrade again. That limits the up front investment required when you buy it pretty heavily. Anyone who can promise a billion in investment over 5-10 years will have more than enough to get us back up to speed.I don't personally care how long it takes, as long as the plans are put in place to upgrade the club to a very high standard. We've waited a long time to see the light at the end of the tunnel as far as the current owners are concerned, I'm sure we can be patient and see the development unfold in the next 5 years or so.
Probably unrealistic, but I'd be intrigued to see what Apple could do with the club.
Jimmy Brexit is sounding more like Knighton.
Apple or Amazon would be most interesting for me because it’d mean them wanting to do some serious business in content and streaming. Would therefore certainly be the most exciting.
Ortega has already been ruled out by Spanish press I think.That is dream one but realistically my first choice would be Ortega,could buy us as a legacy for his family as he's 86. Apparently this Ambani guy worth around $90bn is shady to say the least.
Apple or Amazon would be most interesting for me because it’d mean them wanting to do some serious business in content and streaming. Would therefore certainly be the most exciting.
Ortega has already been ruled out by Spanish press I think.
Would that be true if the known face had/has major questions over how they would run United?to me a known face is better than an unknown face. An unknown face/unknown consortium has less accountability - the so far mentioned candidates are either US based or oil-based. I’d take Sir Jim over that in a heartbeat. Not saying he’s great, but I’m not happy to see a new US owner who doesnt care for anything else than money (and doesnt understand the inner workings of the club/sport) or a sportswashing enterprise. Surely a known face in this regard is good.
Would that be true if the known face had/has major questions over how they would run United?