Chief123
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 12,902
No.Could we sign him and if Shaw is fit try one of them on the right if AWB doesnt improve offensively?
No.Could we sign him and if Shaw is fit try one of them on the right if AWB doesnt improve offensively?
The way he reacted you have to think he's out at least a month or two with ligament damage. I've twisted my ankle like that before and you usually know straight away you've torn some ligaments.
Have you actually read what I was responding to? It wasn't about Reguilon. It was about Shaw. So don't blame me about Reguilon when I was responding to remarks about Shaw. Get a grip lad.
Laird is a right back. It potentially puts him down the pecking order as Williams will be the natural right back backup. I think Laird has the potential to be ahead of Williams though.Is this going to be like when SAF signed Evra, despite already have Heinze in the team?
What does it mean for Laird?
yes, i tore my ligaments 2 weeks ago. Another 4 weeks to go. He will be out for 2 months if he has done his ligaments. If it isn't really bad and only an ankle sprain, maybe a couple of weeks to a month at max
Just got a new massive contract so will expect games.Laird is a right back. It potentially puts him down the pecking order as Williams will be the natural right back backup. I think Laird has the potential to be ahead of Williams though.
Sorry I misread your post. Please accept my apologies. Its true isn't it that Shaw can not be relied upon. Get Sergio in.I was backing up your point. Probably not clear enough about that lol!
Yep a small muscle injury won’t delay things.I'm sure Utd would still sign him if they wanted him if the medical showed that it's not a serious long term injury. I'm pretty sure we signed Dalot in similar circumstances while he was injured.
Laird is a right back. It potentially puts him down the pecking order as Williams will be the natural right back backup. I think Laird has the potential to be ahead of Williams though.
Williams is certainly not comfortable playing left back from what we've seen so far. He started off well but has looked really suspect and awkward at left back in latter half of season. He's only played left back for the first team because that's where hes been needed. If AWB was injured instead of Shaw then he would have played right back more. The couple of occasions he has played right back he has looked better.Williams isn't a RB, he's a LB. He was a LB in the academy (with Laird at RB) and has been a LB in the first team
The good news is Reguilon has no previous ankle injuries so it could just be one of those things. Hopefully there's positive news over the next couple of days and it doesn't delay a move for him.
The big news today is the commentator saying he spoke to the Spain camp yday and there is a United offer for Thiago. That's feckin huge and I thought our rumoured interest was fake.
Williams is certainly not comfortable playing left back from what we've seen so far. The couple of occasions he has played right back he has looked better.
With him being right footed, he will always be more suited to right back. Especially as its so important for full backs to contribute with attacks in modern football. Playing left back with him constantly having to cut back on to his right foot is just too ineffective and easy to defend against.
Williams isn't a RB, he's a LB. He was a LB in the academy (with Laird at RB) and has been a LB in the first team
Yeah that is huge news indeed and trying to work out where the footage came from because the commentary was English
Didn't he get moved over to LB because of Laird?Williams isn't a RB, he's a LB. He was a LB in the academy (with Laird at RB) and has been a LB in the first team
I read exactly what you said mate and the problem in the academy is both Williams and Laird are more comfortable at Right back. But obviously they can only play one right back.
Read what I posted again, in the academy he was a LB, they even moved Laird from LB to RB because Williams was already playing LB. Regardless of whether you think he looks comfortable playing there or not that's his position, it was his position in the academy and it's his position in the first team.
Williams is naturally right footed and was a RB but pushed out of that position by Laird who was and possibly now more talented than him. Williams natural position is RB.
I think the problem with Williams at left back comes when we trying to play out from the back and getting pressed. Williams has to come more infield to receive the ball. And this limit his passing options to the midfield and forwards. Other than that he doesn't seem much different on either side with his defending Or ability to go forwardI read exactly what you said mate and the problem in the academy is both Williams and Laird are more comfortable at Right back. But obviously they can only play one right back.
It's the same problem we used to have with Gary Neville and Phil Neville. But you can't play them both in the same position which is why P Neville played left back as he was more comfortable than Gary as a left back. But Phil's better position was right back.
It's clear to all that Williams is not suited to left back at all. He has looked much better at right back. He naturally would be as he's right footed.
I read exactly what you said mate and the problem in the academy is both Williams and Laird are more comfortable at Right back. But obviously they can only play one right back.
It's the same problem we used to have with Gary Neville and Phil Neville. But you can't play them both in the same position which is why P Neville played left back as he was more comfortable than Gary as a left back. But Phil's better position was right back.
It's clear to all that Williams is not suited to left back at all. He has looked much better at right back. He naturally would be as he's right footed.
AWB is the best in the business at it. I'm not sure how that negates what I've said. Shaw is still very good at defending.
You have to remember players don't always break through into a team in their natural position. Laird is clearly a natural right back mate.Laird was LB before he was moved to RB, he scored an insane number of goals from LB before he was moved
If you honestly think Williams is more a left back than a right back, then we have to agree to disagree. If it wasn't for Laird, Williams would have been playing right back in the academy. If it wasn't for shaws injury and AWB's consistently good injury record then Williams would have been playing right back in the first team too.You keep saying the same thing and yet it goes against his almost complete progression as a footballer. Funny how those who actually know what they're on about have almost entirely played him in the position you say he's not a natural in
Alas I'm tapping out now as I fear this is just going to go around in circles
Laird was LB before he was moved to RB, he scored an insane number of goals from LB before he was moved
You have to remember players don't always break through into a team in their natural position. Laird is clearly a natural right back mate.
Smalling started his Utd career as a right back. So did Wes Brown. So did Phil Jones. It doesn't mean that's their natural position. They break through wherever the opportunity arises.
There are not many successful wrong footed full backs in the history of the game. Dennis Irwin and Phillip Lahm (who changed later) a couple of the few.
Wrong footed full backs simply does not work in the modern game.
Ashley young played left back most of the time for us in defence. He was never a natural at it nor was it his natural position. Left back is probably the one position on the team where you will find the least amount of specialists as it's hard to find a natural one.
Williams is NOT suited to play LB in the modern game. I won’t repeat what others have said here but it’s clear that you’re off the mark with your arguments that Williams is naturally a LB.
Yes when we get pressed is where the major issues arise. At the end of the season our whole team was right footed (except for Greenwood the double footed freak). When a team presses its a lot easier to press a team who have wrong footed players in central defence and full back positions because their natural pass would always be inwards and centrally towards the danger areas. It's one of the reason Ole also wants a left footed centre back so the build up can progress from both sides of the pitch without being suspect to the press.I think the problem with Williams at left back comes when we trying to play out from the back and getting pressed. Williams has to come more infield to receive the ball. And this limit his passing options to the midfield and forwards. Other than that he doesn't seem much different on either side with his defending Or ability to go forward
To be fair, you claimed Laird was a left back and he's scored an insane amount of goals from there in the academy. That''s simply not true mate. Nearly all his goals and assists have been from right back.I'm off the mark with nothing so you can do one with that kind of provocation
I never once said Williams is a natural LB I just it's the position he's played almost all of his professional career
To be fair, you claimed Laird was a left back and he's scored an insane amount of goals from there in the academy. That''s simply not true mate. Nearly all his goals and assists have been from right back.
We're just beating around the bush now mate.Did I? Quote me. I think you'll find I said Laird was LB as in he was playing LB. he scored just under 20 goals from LB in the under 16's
I've never given an opinion on where either Laird or Williams should be played just stated the facts of where they have played