Tiber
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,432
Looks like they get huge crowds
Mandatory gif:When you consider Pereira got a goal an assist (should have had 2 assists with Lukakus missed header in 1st half) this thread is just... bizarre.
Made even worse as when we do eventually drop points it'll get bumped by those and they'll do the old "told you so" bullshit despite ignoring the fact that we've won 13 of 16 games. Thirteen of sixteen games for fecks sake!
But what we really need is Fellaini picking up the ball in midfield and running the ball out for an opposition throw in.
nothing epitomizes our banter era like this moment did.Mandatory gif:
Are you sure?nothing epitomizes our banter era like this moment did.
How did we mount yet another comeback without Fellaini?
Wasn't he supposed to be our saviour?
Legend. Getting everton out of his system for a Man Utd equalizer against fulham. We were lucky he didn't slide on the pitch. That would have been unforgettable for next 50 years.Are you sure?
There is so much to choose.
What’s with the bump?Bump
What’s with the bump?
Perhaps it would’ve been easier for us had we had Fellaini, just look at how they struggled with Lukaku’s size.
It’s not like we played some expensive dominant football last night.
It doesn’t matter though, because we’ve fecking won!
Can't we just enjoy things without smearing someone who, by all means, was a good pro and servant?
Yes, you don't like the style associated with him, it's clear. Not his bloody fault though.
Can't we just enjoy things without smearing someone who, by all means, was a good pro and servant?
Yes, you don't like the style associated with him, it's clear. Not his bloody fault though.
He is a poor midfielder, always has been. But as a utility/plan b player he is very special.Ever since he and his master left the club we can't stop winning. Also note that it makes sense to have a striker with some physicality upfront to spice things up (RVN, Shearer, Batistuta, Sheringham, Vieri the list go on and on). However having a midfielder whose more renowned for being good with his head and his elbows rather then with his feet is silly. I can't remember any top midfielder being like that. Which kind of explains why the guy was the first deadwood Ole wanted to get rid off and why he ended up in China instead of Real, Barcelona or Juventus.
He is a poor midfielder, always has been. But as a utility/plan b player he is very special.
PSG don’t get to face players like him every weekend, a player like that gives them a completely different challenge.
We’ve been winning games under Ole before he left, it has got nothing to do with it, and Fellaini has got nothing to do with Jose, they are seperate people.
I don’t think we would’ve been in the QF if not for his presence in the box against Juventus.
Because he shouldn’t be played in midfield, at all. No.10 yes, deeper than that is a waste of his qualities as a unique player.Top clubs can't afford bypassing midfield which explains why you won't see a midfielder like Fellaini at any top club unless of course, that club is managed by idiots.
Fellaini is a symptom of a team that's not functioning correctly. To his credit the guy will always stick to the manager and give his 100% no matter the crap thrown at him which explain why managers under pressure loves him.
We would have done way better this season if we were managed properly from day 1. There again if the team functioned correctly then Fellaini wouldn't be in it. As said no top club would play a midfielder like Fellaini.
Well, his chest control is comfortably the best ive ever seen, so there’s that.I remember one poster insisting to me that Fellaini is a technical player. I just wanted to bring that up again because it still sticks out as so odd to me.
Because he shouldn’t be played in midfield, at all. No.10 yes, deeper than that is a waste of his qualities as a unique player.
He should be played only as some sort of a target man and that’s it, shall I remind you how he completey shat on us twice when he played for Everton?
Yeah, no top club would be persisting with Jones, Smalling, Young and Valencia for all those years either. And no top club would be playing a bunch of kids in midfield in a CL QF neither.
No top club would be playing Carrick and Cleverley in a midfield two for an entire season.
We’re Manchester United, it is not just a top club, it’s a special top club.
I liked Fellaini and I think he would’ve been a useful squad player under Ole and could’ve always help us out and contribute in difficult situations.
You’re glad he’s gone, that’s fine, your opinion and outlook on things.
We’ve had worse footballers than Fellaini when we used to win titles in the squad, people just associate him with th Moyes-LvG-Era for some reason, as if he was the only under performing player during those times.
Well, his chest control is comfortably the best ive ever seen, so there’s that.
In 2014/15, he played 37 games (mostly in midfield) under LVG. So the notion that he can only play as target man, and not suit to passing football, is silly.
Can't we just enjoy things without smearing someone who, by all means, was a good pro and servant?
Yes, you don't like the style associated with him, it's clear. Not his bloody fault though.
Maybe that was also a factor for doing feck all with the ball. If you are a possession side and Fellaini is one of your midfielders, then you are fecked.
Van Gaal was a weird manager at times. Fellaini can do the basics of course, but if you are an oppo team, you will be happy to see him in midfield. Slow and cumbersome, useless on the ball going forward and you can pass and run rings around him if you are a decent side. He may smack you with his elbow and put in a shift, but if you surrender possession to him, you have nothing to fear in central midfield where he cant hurt you with the ball at his feet. Having said that, he had some very good games here and for Belgium at times, but i never felt he was good enough to be a starter here or to occupy a central midfield spot when we wanted to attack.
Don't you find it strange that Ole himself doesn't agree with you? And he decided to get rid of him without getting anyone else or even a significant sum of money for him?I liked Fellaini and I think he would’ve been a useful squad player under Ole and could’ve always help us out and contribute in difficult situations.
This deal could have been well advanced before Ole even got the job to be fair.Don't you find it strange that Ole himself doesn't agree with you? And he decided to get rid of him without getting anyone else or even a significant sum of money for him?
He is a poor midfielder, always has been. But as a utility/plan b player he is very special.
PSG don’t get to face players like him every weekend, a player like that gives them a completely different challenge.
We’ve been winning games under Ole before he left, it has got nothing to do with it, and Fellaini has got nothing to do with Jose, they are seperate people.
I don’t think we would’ve been in the QF if not for his presence in the box against Juventus.
We’ve had worse footballers than Fellaini when we used to win titles in the squad, people just associate him with th Moyes-LvG-Era for some reason, as if he was the only under performing player during those times.
Tom CleverleySuch as?
Tom Cleverley
Fabio
David May
Phil Neville
Johny Evans
Anderson
Can't we just enjoy things without smearing someone who, by all means, was a good pro and servant?
Yes, you don't like the style associated with him, it's clear. Not his bloody fault though.
Tom Cleverley
Fabio
David May
Phil Neville
Johny Evans
Anderson
Can't we just enjoy things without smearing someone who, by all means, was a good pro and servant?
Yes, you don't like the style associated with him, it's clear. Not his bloody fault though.
Jesus Christ. I made a mistake clicking on the spoiler.Are you sure?
There is so much to choose.