- Joined
- Mar 27, 2021
- Messages
- 3,388
For the way we want to play he isn't good enough - not good enough with passing, not good enough with the ball to his feet, his dribble is trash
He's started both EFL games to be fair, and has started one game in Europa League game all season so not really a demotion.
He's a squad player and a useful one at that, he's not going to dispose Casemiro, Eriksen or Bruno, not many players would.
But he does do and is being used for is steadying the ship at the end of games, or as last night, a cup player to rest others.
So no, I don't think the coaching staff consistently selecting him, using him and trusting him as them saying McT isn't good enough to play for United, that'd be a strange way of showing it really do you not think?
2 key passes(whatever that means) is no good if you're also giving the ball away consistently.
Which is why Bruno also gets criticised.
I think if you read back I have always stated McT is a squad player, and a useful one at that. It does appear that the management team feel the same. I don't think that's a controversial statement to be honest and I haven't changed my stance on that.But he was a starter according to you at the start of this thread and not someone ETH was looking to replace. You were wrong and you’ve clearly changed your mind so he’s obviously not as good as you previously made out or thought he was.
Under Ole and Ralf he was a guaranteed starter, he now isn’t even trusted to start Europa games against weak teams. He’s been well and truly demoted along with likes of Maguire and Fred who were also guaranteed starters. That’s shows you how manager rates them, their first players he’s made sure he doesn’t have to start.
Not everyone can be replaced straight away, but assuming the fact he gets subbed on is some sort of backup for your argument is just as misguided as when you were wrong to assume ETH would start him and wasn’t looking to replace him. If anything him not being trusted to start suggests he isn’t a good squad player and he’ll lose more game time when some are brought in.
I think if you read back I have always stated McT is a squad player, and a useful one at that. It does appear that the management team feel the same. I don't think that's a controversial statement to be honest and I haven't changed my stance on that.
Can we do better? For sure, but only City van get away with having two world class players in every position, United can't. So squad players are useful and have their purpose.
From the way we want to play Fred, Lindelof, Maguire, Awb and Martial are not good enough. He is a DM and he is better than Fred so if we dont change half of the squad wich I dont see happening he is a useful part of 30 men who we have at our disposal.For the way we want to play he isn't good enough - not good enough with passing, not good enough with the ball to his feet, his dribble is trash
he's a squad player and has shown he's good enough, otherwise why is he still picked despite the changes in coaching teams?You have referred to him as a sure fire starter under SAF and said that ETH wasn’t looking to replace him in the starting lineup so he’s clearly getting worse in your eyes.
You may he is a good squad player but he’s not performing like one and guessing what manager thinks of him to backup what you are saying doesn’t make sense. When he isn’t even trusted to start in the Europa it doesn’t seem like the coaches think he’s a good squad player.
Mctominay and Maguire have bad biggest demotions under ETH, they’ve gone from first names on team sheet to not starting and being behind likes of Lindelof, Fred and DVB. ETH’s assessment of them clearly isn’t that favourable.
he's a squad player and has shown he's good enough, otherwise why is he still picked despite the changes in coaching teams?
Going back to the beginning of the thread, this is what I said.
So it's clear I've stayed consistent in my viewpoint, unlike some other knee jerk views in this thread.
He's a good squad player, all this hyperbole that he's useless or a championship player et al, is hilarious to read.
You said he was a sure fire starter for SAF, that’s just as silly as some of bad stuff said about him and isn’t consistent with what you’re saying now.
I suggested he would be, mainly due to Sir Alex's tendancy to have players such as Fletcher, Cleverly, O Shea, McClair, P. Neville, most of which have to most apps in SAFs tenure.
He loved a squad player, someone who will work hard but who may not have been the best player in the world.
Here's what Sir Alex said about McT: "Scott McTominay is now emerging as one of Man United's big players. When you watch Man United pick their team for a big game, McTominay's name is in it. He's a good character, a great trainer.
Oh and as a final word ...who signed McT as a young kid??
I think joined the club when he was about 6 or 7 so I can assume it wasn’t SAF, you obviously know who it was though or maybe you just didn’t think that through. What are your thoughts on Phil Jones, next Duncan Edwards I would guess.
Jesus man, it was Sir Alex who brought him to the club.
That period of his absolutely awful side footed shot, followed by a 10 yard pass straight to the opposition shows why he just keep being a starter.
I feel like I never see this kind of inconsistency at other top clubs.
He sticks out like a sore thumb at times when we try to build one touch moves in the final third. I like Scott for his attitude but the quality will always be lacking at a club like United.That period of his absolutely awful side footed shot, followed by a 10 yard pass straight to the opposition shows why he just keep being a starter.
I feel like I never see this kind of inconsistency at other top clubs.
As a 5 year old, don’t quite get how a football club works do you.
And has continued to sing his praises and claim he needs to play in every big game the club has.As a 5 year old, don’t quite get how a football club works do you.
SAF helped deliver his birth. Held him up by his ankles and vowed to see him sign for United as soon as he could walk.
And has continued to sing his praises and claim he needs to play in every big game the club has.
Yeah, I guess Sir Alex (and I) don't know how a club works
SAF helped deliver his birth. Held him up by his ankles and vowed to see him sign for United as soon as he could walk.
With all due respect, and this will be my last word to you in this as you are offering absolutely nothing constructive to the conversation.No it’s just you that thinks SAF was going around recruiting 5 year olds so no need to bracket him with you.
He just seems like the kind of player who’d naturally fit into a Southgate side. I’m sure he’d be selected ahead of Rice, if he played for England.
He’s a weird one. In the next 20 games he’ll have 3 world class performances and the rest we’ll be questioning his football ability.
For me it's quite clear at this point that he plays Mctominay for height on defensive and attacking set pieces alone, because he still can't trust our defence. Once the defence is settled and get to desired level, plus with the introduction of Casemiro, I am sure he will be ni more than rotation option at best.
ETH doesn't seem that stupid.
On the bench.Where is he anyway?
McTominay is backup to Casemiro. Everyone has their role, it's not just a generic midfield group. Casemiro/McTominay is the DM, Eriksen/Fred is the CM, Bruno/Donny is the AM. Anyone goes down, and their direct replacement comes in. That's all there is. McTominay is very good to have as a squad player for us.Gotta bump this thread because I was one of his biggest critics and people disagreed a lot with me and few others back then saying we were wrong for cticising him that much and that there is a reason previous managers played him a lot. It's quite clear we play much better without him, and thankfully ETH doesn't find him important at all anymore, even VDB is more important these days. He is simply not good enough for us, and we play much better without him in our midflmield.
He’s literally been involved in every single game this season - regularly as the first sub - until he got ill this week.Gotta bump this thread because I was one of his biggest critics and people disagreed a lot with me and few others back then saying we were wrong for cticising him that much and that there is a reason previous managers played him a lot. It's quite clear we play much better without him, and thankfully ETH doesn't find him important at all anymore, even VDB is more important these days. He is simply not good enough for us, and we play much better without him in our midflmield.
Disagree. Any of his strengths are massively downplayed by his inability to show for and get involved in the game on the ball. He averages the lowest attempted passes at the club in central midfield by a considerable distance (and probably across the top 6 clubs). It’s such a simple but huge flaw in his game.McTominay is very good to have as a squad player for us.
Yeah but again - he's a squad player. He's a backup to Casemiro. He can come in during big games and we aren't completely fecked, as he's shown regularly in big games. A squad player behind the best in the world in his position will never be a complete, top player. It's normally very tough to even get a decent player there. So I'm very happy to have McTominay as that, because he'd be content with that role too.Disagree. Any of his strengths are massively downplayed by his inability to show for and get involved in the game on the ball. He averages the lowest attempted passes at the club in central midfield by a considerable distance (and probably across the top 6 clubs). It’s such a simple but huge flaw in his game.
He’s literally been involved in every single game this season - regularly as the first sub - until he got ill this week.
Yeah but again - he's a squad player. He's a backup to Casemiro. He can come in during big games and we aren't completely fecked, as he's shown regularly in big games. A squad player behind the best in the world in his position will never be a complete, top player. It's normally very tough to even get a decent player there. So I'm very happy to have McTominay as that, because he'd be content with that role too.