He's a new Matic in the making.
Can go far. His passes are solid too.
Said previously he can be molded to become Matic successor. He looks very close to him, looks a younger Matic.
He's a new Matic in the making.
Can go far. His passes are solid too.
Including this oneKid is special. Playing like a man.
Btw for the many doubters here (including me) he did a lot of forward passes.
Not so average in passing after all.
Forward passes, forward passes.
Two difficult matches and being thrown on deep waters. Lad doesn't even look phased. Good signs.
Fixed. Fletcher is the energetic combative type that can carry the ball forward, McTominay is more of the physical combative type that relies more on pass and move.Darren Fletcher 2.0 Physical type/version
Including this one
Agree with this. I like the lad.It would be difficult to fail to be impressed by him. He's played relatively little football at any sort of level, much less CL and PL level in tough midfield battles and he doesn't look out of place. He needs time and there'll be bad days to come, as happens to almost every young player, but he's making breaking into United's midfield look a lot easier than it actually is.
His biggest test so far against CHELSEA, scored A+.It would be difficult to fail to be impressed by him. He's played relatively little football at any sort of level, much less CL and PL level in tough midfield battles and he doesn't look out of place. He needs time and there'll be bad days to come, as happens to almost every young player, but he's making breaking into United's midfield look a lot easier than it actually is.
But his job was to man mark Hazard. He can't do both.
My question is, did Lindelof have to come so far out, especially as McTominay was making his way out to Hazard?
It just created a massive whole in our defence, which in the end Chelsea were able exploit.
But his job was to man mark Hazard. He can't do both.
My question is, did Lindelof have to come so far out, especially as McTominay was making his way out to Hazard?
It just created a massive whole in our defence, which in the end Chelsea were able exploit.
If his job was to exclusively man mark Hazard why was he tracking Willian’s run?
Initially, he tracked Willian on the counter, then when he saw Hazard he stopped.
Probably thought someone else would drop or shuffle across.
When someone makes a run like that you have to track it.
You sure as shit don’t start tracking it then suddenly stop.
Watching live in the ground it felt like the biggest error was from Valencia playing him onside when he did not need to break the defensive line. Replays only confirmed that. I suppose McTominay could have tracked without any downside, but the goal comes about because of Valencia’s positioning primarily. It’s his error.Well, exactly. That was a bad mistake. Schoolboy error. No big deal in the grand scheme of things. He’ll learn from it.
Yeah.I was really disappointed in the poor tracking for the goal but this can happen. He has the skillsets required to be a top player according to Jose so I'm behind him.
Bad mistake for the goal but I think he did very well out there given his comparative lack of experience.
Some people keep blaming Scott for that goal and they have a valid point. He should have tracked Willian rather than ball watch. But rewind a bit. The first problem was Valencia's average cross to the box. Tony could have done a lot better with the cross.
The second problem was Pogba who failed to leap and intercept the Chelsea player who headed the ball out (can't remember who now). For some reasons, Pogba simply didn't bother to jump and considering the danger of a counter attack, that created a massive problem for United. The third problem was Scott failing to track Willian as it has been highlighted.
The fifth problem was Lindelof, a much more experienced defender than Scott. I thought he failed to organise that defensive position well. Like Scott, he ball watched otherwise Willian could have been tracked and stopped.
Some people keep blaming Scott for that goal and they have a valid point. He should have tracked Willian rather than ball watch. But rewind a bit. The first problem was Valencia's average cross to the box. Tony could have done a lot better with the cross.
The second problem was Pogba who failed to leap and intercept the Chelsea player who headed the ball out (can't remember who now). For some reasons, Pogba simply didn't bother to jump and considering the danger of a counter attack, that created a massive problem for United. The third problem was Scott failing to track Willian as it has been highlighted.
The fifth problem was Lindelof, a much more experienced defender than Scott. I thought he failed to organise that defensive position well. Like Scott, he ball watched otherwise Willian could have been tracked and stopped.
Watching live in the ground it felt like the biggest error was from Valencia playing him onside when he did not need to break the defensive line. Replays only confirmed that. I suppose McTominay could have tracked without any downside, but the goal comes about because of Valencia’s positioning primarily. It’s his error.
Mou on him post match was very positive. Even highlighted his lack of goals and assists, but said not to worry because he knows he can do that, that we saw it in pre season, and that he has wanted him to focus on the basics so far.