Both > Only Schneiderlin > Only Schweinsteiger
Said it perfectly.
Both > Only Schneiderlin > Only Schweinsteiger
Calling Schneiderlin a 'Dream' signing is a bit melodramatic. He's a midfielder from a midtable team. He is good but he's in no way, shape or form a dream signing. Yeah, signing for United should be a dream come true for him. Thanks.Schneiderlin would be a dream signing for us - at the right age with good 7-8 years ahead of him, Premier league proven, strong tackler with good overall contribution, could grow with us to become even more better.
Calling Schneiderlin a 'Dream' signing is a bit melodramatic. He's a midfielder from a midtable team. He is good but he's in no way, shape or form a dream signing. Yeah, signing for United should be a dream come true for him. Thanks.
absolutely shocked at how one sided this vote it, people are completely over stating Schneiderlin's abilities I believe. He is a good player, not a great. Does he have room to improve, certainly.
The ideal scenario though is to have them both, we get a mix of experience with Schneiderlin's potential. Working with Carrick and Schweinsteiger would be great for him.
absolutely shocked at how one sided this vote it, people are completely over stating Schneiderlin's abilities I believe. He is a good player, not a great. Does he have room to improve, certainly.
The ideal scenario though is to have them both, we get a mix of experience with Schneiderlin's potential. Working with Carrick and Schweinsteiger would be great for him.
I agree that both would be ideal but most people including myself are also considering their respective ages and Schneiderlin also has experience of the EPL.
If you'd have asked me a few years back, Schweinsteiger would have been my number one CM choice.
No need to roll your eyes, people picked him because of the things Kaos said in the post above yours. Age, used to the league and less injury prone. It wasn't simply down to who is the better player.If that's true, I hope he really lives up to the expectations of the 748 people who chose him over Schweinsteiger
Well, if that were the only criteria, we'd have kept Cleverly.No need to roll your eyes, people picked him because of the things Kaos said in the post above yours. Age, used to the league and less injury prone. It wasn't simply down to who is the better player.
You sound unhappy with this signing?Schneiderlin medical today at United...apparently.
If that's true, I hope he really lives up to the expectations of the 748 people who chose him over Schweinsteiger
Well, if that were the only criteria, we'd have kept Cleverly.
Not unhappy. Not ecstatic either. In my eyes, he's a average player who looks good in a midtable team. I will support him once he signs for us but I'm still skeptical about his prowess.You sound unhappy with this signing?
No, but the criteria that Ixion pointed to apply to both.Yeah because Schneiderlin and Cleverley are the same player.
I guess a defensive midfielder or defence minded midfielder isn't usually meant to get one ecstatic anyway. They usually perform a vital role without getting anyone off of their chairs. That's probably why people are actually happy about this rather than him becoming the next great midfielder.Not unhappy. Not ecstatic either. In my eyes, he's a average player who looks good in a midtable team. I will support him once he signs for us but I'm still skeptical about his prowess.
For goodness sake, obviously ability is a factor and Schneiderlin is a hell of a lot better than Cleverly. Schweinsteiger is a better player than Schneiderlin but he's good enough that when you weigh other things up a lot of people can see it makes more sense to sign him. We'll get 7-8 years out of him rather than 2-3 and he's an excellent player.No, but the criteria that Ixion pointed to apply to both.
I get your point. Was just pointing to the obvious flaw in the criteria you directed me towards. Was just being cheeky.For goodness sake, obviously ability is a factor and Schneiderlin is a hell of a lot better than Cleverly. Schweinsteiger is a better player than Schneiderlin but he's good enough that when you weigh other things up a lot of people can see it makes more sense to sign him. We'll get 7-8 years out of him rather than 2-3.
Not entirely true. Gundogan or Vidal would have gotten me ecstatic.I guess a defensive midfielder or defence minded midfielder isn't usually meant to get one ecstatic anyway. They usually perform a vital role without getting anyone off of their chairs. That's probably why people are actually happy about this rather than him becoming the next great midfielder.
Not entirely true. Gundogan or Vidal would have gotten me ecstatic.
Vidal has played as a defensive midfielder. And Gundogan is a complete midfielder akin to Carrick.Neither of those are defensive midfielders.
Very different players. This guy seems to be defence minded. Gundogan is a passing/playmaking midfielder who can do a bit of defending.Not entirely true. Gundogan or Vidal would have gotten me ecstatic.
Vidal has played as a defensive midfielder. And Gundoganiswas a complete midfielder akin to Carrick.
The majority of the fans at this point care more about the endurance of a transfer, especially a midfielder hence the poll results. Morgan brings age, potential, work rate and athleticism to the table, while Sebastian has seen and done it all and will mainly contribute with his experience for a potential 2-3 years. Schneiderlin has the upper hand in age, physicality, hunger, but in no way does that have to hint at a undervaluation of a potential Schweinsteiger transfer. Signing both would be ideal, you'll get your hands on both sides of the spectrum.
Come on he has been the top DM/box-to-box midfielder in the league and Southampton has been a very good team with very limited resources in past couple of years. His stats match any top DM in the world and he has had many outstanding performances over the recent years. Most importantly, he is the type of midfielder we have been crying out for years, and at the right age and fair price range too.Not unhappy. Not ecstatic either. In my eyes, he's a average player who looks good in a midtable team. I will support him once he signs for us but I'm still skeptical about his prowess.
Vidal started his career as a CDM until he developed into a box-to-box midfielder at Juventus.Fixed that for you.
He could've been called a 'complete midfielder' before his injury problems that ruled him out of the game for what, a year? Now he's not exactly the same player he's been before and there are and will be question marks over his health, it does seem a bit strange that Bayern, United, Arsenal and Barcelona who were allegedly so eager to get him cooled their interest, no?
As for Vidal, he could've played as a CDM but it doesn't make him one. You could as well say that Herrera or even Rooney played CDM yet neither is a true CDM, akin to Schneiderlin. We could get another all-around midfielder who's great with everything and all that and still not fix our problem that occurs once Carrick is injured.
He very rarely played as a CDM at Leverkusen or for the nationalteam. At Leverkusen he sometimes even played as a number 10 in a diamond, most of the time he was used as a more attacking box to box midfielder or filled in as a fullback when necessary. He actually was Leverkusen's top scorer in 10/11 when they finished 2nd. His role in Bielsa's Chile side at the World Cup 2010 was also more that of a left sided box to box midfielder in crazy gung-ho 343ish tactics and he was constantly running up and down the pitch.Vidal started his career as a CDM until he developed into a box-to-box midfielder at Juventus.
Why couldn't you just post that in the Schneiderlin thread rather than bumping your own thread?
I remember he initially played as a defensive mid even when he started at Juventus. And I have seen him play as a defensive mid for Leverkusen. But, yes, primarily his best contributions have come as an attacking box-to-box midfielder. But, he's a very intelligent midfielder in the sense that he positions himself cleverly when in defense mode.He very rarely played as a CDM at Leverkusen or for the nationalteam. At Leverkusen he sometimes even played as a number 10 in a diamond, most of the time he was used as a more attacking box to box midfielder or filled in as a fullback when necessary. He actually was Leverkusen's top scorer in 10/11 when they finished 2nd. His role in Bielsa's Chile side at the World Cup 2010 was also more that of a left sided box to box midfielder in crazy gung-ho 343ish tactics and he was constantly running up and down the pitch.