Eyepopper
Lowering the tone since 2006
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 67,232
TBH I’m probably the only person on Earth who’s never seen Game of Thrones ….but like the thought of Ruud taking Ten Hags job.Maybe this is Ruud playing 4d chess and he s gonna take Erik's job Game of Thrones style.
TBH I’m probably the only person on Earth who’s never seen Game of Thrones ….but like the thought of Ruud taking Ten Hags job.
DittoI also have never seen it!
He gets overlooked so often which is insane seeing as he only has one penalty included in his 187 league goals which I’m 99% certain only Shearer tops and if you take away penalties Shearer and Cole are only about 15 goals or so apart whilst Shearer also played about 40 games more, always felt Hoddle played a massive part in Cole being so overlooked.
Me tooDitto
He has 64.7% win percentage with PSV and won a cup trophy. Surely, that’s more than enough to be in the conversation for a manager role at Burnley. Not just about his iconic and name in the football world.
Interesting back ground stuff! It makes it also more understandable how he could be more interested in a coaching spot at United under ETH than a manager role at Burnley. But what do you or others who have followed him at PSV (or Netherlands) think of his candidacy for an assistant coach at Man Utd?
I think Ruud would be a good addition hopefully we can get it done, also I've never understood the hate Fabrizio Romano gets the guy gets a lot of exclusives he was the first to report this, no?
Thanks for thatIt was all over the news - and it's mentioned in a couple of autobio's.
Your memory is a bit off but along the right lines, the catalyst Ruud was on the bench expecting to come on for Saha after being dropped - but Fergie wanted Evra and Vida to play as new guys to give them a taste of a league victory. Ruud i believe was on for the golden boot, he called fergie a couple of expletives and fergie and the staff and players were shocked and told ruud to calm the f down etc.
Fergie suspected ruud has had his head turned by madrid already by then, and he then abused ronaldo in training saying "go cry to your dad" after being foulded, meaning Carlos Q, however Ronnie's dad had recently died and he was 18 at the time. It didn't go down well and a fight broke out - the players backed Ronaldo and ruud was later sold to Madrid.
Ruud has since said he acted like a child and regrets his behaviour and has apologised to fergie and everything is good between them.
I highly doubt it. But let's phrase it like this (also as a comment on @Castia above stating merely the same): it shouldn't be. Succes nowadays isn't determined/achieved by just winning. Winning can be incidental. What's more important is creating a foundation to fall back on. It creates continuity in the process of achieving succes as well as a safety net when succes isn't achieved. Concepts like a clear philosophy implemented through your whole club (etc.) are examples of that.
To be honest, that's the main difference between clubs like Liverpool/City and Man Utd at the moment. Ruud doesn't fit in that picture. He is not tactically developped in a modern way with lacking clear philosophies and ideas as an head coach to identify with and build on as an organization.
At the end of the day Ruud himself said that he wasn’t ready and only stepped in as a favour to PSV. This will be part of his learning, something that he considers a challenge in its own rightI agree with you regarding it’s not about success and winning only nowadays but that’s only if you play in top level.
We’re talking about Burnley. Their main goal now isn’t just implementing playing style, their main goal is to get promotion. To do so is about getting a result even if it’s ugly.
TBH I’m probably the only person on Earth who’s never seen Game of Thrones ….but like the thought of Ruud taking Ten Hags job.
I also have never seen it!
Ditto
Me too
Thanks. If you’re right, I don’t find any particular reason to distrust your analysis, there are a few hypotheses available as to why United have contacted him for a role.I highly doubt it. But let's phrase it like this (also as a comment on @Castia above stating merely the same): it shouldn't be. Succes nowadays isn't determined/achieved by just winning. Winning can be incidental. What's more important is creating a foundation to fall back on. It creates continuity in the process of achieving succes as well as a safety net when succes isn't achieved. Concepts like a clear philosophy implemented through your whole club (etc.) are examples of that.
To be honest, that's the main difference between clubs like Liverpool/City and Man Utd at the moment. Ruud doesn't fit in that picture. He is not tactically developped in a modern way with lacking clear philosophies and ideas as an head coach to identify with and build on as an organization.
He isn't ready for the job and a lot of people have serious doubts he will ever be. Tactics are nowadays more important and complex than ever and that part lacks Ruud the most. However, he has strong sides too. He is motivator, a gentlemen, a great endorsement and his experiences as an ex-prof have benefits in developing players. For example, Xavi Simons was a player who was satisfied with Ruud's capabilities as a mentor for young players. Living for the sport, how to get better, to find and exploite the small margins of success on the highest level. I think someone like Rashford could benefit from the presence of Ruud. Most people, just like me, think he is better in a role at the front office, a specialist trainer or in this case as an assistant trainer instead of being the head coach.
But yeah, we are all a bit surprised that United considers him as an assistant coach. Although I have to admit, everyone loves Ruud (you just can't hate the man). It is a huge but also a very cool step to make. And learning form Erik ten Hag, who i consider as a good coach based on his Ajax period, doesn't seems to be a bad thing for his development.
Thanks. If you’re right, I don’t find any particular reason to distrust your analysis, there are a few hypotheses available as to why United have contacted him for a role.
1) The New Guys (Rats/Blanc/Brails/Wilc*x/Asswort/Berra/etc) wants him as the next manager, undermining Ten Hag in a deft move, and are completely oblivious to the fact that anyone working with him for a while would laugh at the idea of him replacing anyone in such a job. They lay their deft plans on the bases of a bit of charisma and a bit of niceness.
2. Ten Hag wants him, anyone really, as long as they’re Dutch and not competent enough to challenge his autistic tactics. The New Guys, having spent sic months to evaluate Ten Hag and sounding out alternatives , have concluded that he not only shall have a new contract, he shall be given increased power and total reign over any decision in the club going forward.
3. The New Guys, having decided that from now on the football people (Wilc*x and Asswort (sshhh…)) should have a thorugh say on devisions oertaining to building a consistent way to do things regarding style of play, profile of coaches and players, and yet cooperate with Ten Hag on what staff and team lacks in order to improve. They have together (sssh) identified the need for someone who a) can understand the head coach and follow his lead when it comes to tasks and instructions, and is good at gaining trust with players, help them build their own carreers and capabilities based on Ten Hag’s ideas of what the team needs, being a mentir and specialist trainer rather than a head coach or evwn a tactical coach. Someone who can help getting players like Rashford up to their best and maybe prohibit new ‘Sancho-cases’ from developing? They have done their due diligence on Ruud and talked to their connections in Dutch football as well, and know that this is exactly what Ruud is good at. He is self aware and intwlligent, and knows this too, hence being more interested in a specialized role at a big club doing what he can, rather than a manager role lower in the system, doing what he’s not good at.
Other hypotheses, or do these cover it?
I’m interested to see if he replaces McClaren or something. When ETH first joined and McClaren joined, I assumed that McClaren would have been a temporary, almost transitional coach due to his huge experience with English football (since ETH and MVDG were not experienced in England) and then phase out after a year or two, since McClaren is 63 now, isn’t exactly the youngest and more than likely doesn’t need the money.
I’m starting to think no with managers/coaches now. They employ their friends. Get there mates in. It’s not constructive enough.surely you'd want the manager to have a say in who his coaches are?
When you play the Game of Thrones, you win or you dieNot sure about this one if it's an INEOS-forced thing.
If he's just being parachuted in, there's a chance both himself and Ten Hag will see him as our possible/probable future manager and it's easy to imagine an unproductive relationship with Ten Hag distrusting Ruud and Ruud having very little incentive to help much at the first sign of things going sideways again.
Maybe feels like it would potentially be a bit of a Van Gaal/Giggs situation, but worse.
I’m starting to think no with managers/coaches now. They employ their friends. Get there mates in. It’s not constructive enough.
We tried to get him (or RvP) as a coach when ten hag joined but he turned us down. Ten Hag reportedly wanted a coach who knew the club well to connect to the players. This is very likely an appointment that Ten Hag has pushed for.Not sure about this one if it's an INEOS-forced thing.
If he's just being parachuted in, there's a chance both himself and Ten Hag will see him as our possible/probable future manager and it's easy to imagine an unproductive relationship with Ten Hag distrusting Ruud and Ruud having very little incentive to help much at the first sign of things going sideways again.
Maybe feels like it would potentially be a bit of a Van Gaal/Giggs situation, but worse.
We tried to get him (or RvP) as a coach when ten hag joined but he turned us down. Ten Hag reportedly wanted a coach who knew the club well to connect to the players. This is very likely an appointment that Ten Hag has pushed for.
They be Dutching over there... What was Ten Hag doing taking the kickoff as a centre half anyway?
He turned to himafter being turned down by RvN (or RvP, again I forget which one it was. Think it was ruud). It was apparently key for Ten Hag to have someone who knew the club in the coaching staff, I remember reading about that at the time.He already has that in McLaren though?