I know, it was a rash thing to say I’m incredibly sad to see it’s being allowed to go on, those videos are heartbreaking.Play that out in your head.
I know, it was a rash thing to say I’m incredibly sad to see it’s being allowed to go on, those videos are heartbreaking.Play that out in your head.
I couldn't say, but I'm skeptical. However maybe it's time to do that. I think most everyone analyzing this from the outside still thought Russia would grind out victory in a few years, until the most recent Ukrainian offensive. But obviously we don't have a clear idea of how dire the Russian equipment, logistics and manufacturing situation is.We have been hearing this bs for ages, the Ukrainians would have already been operating it now and built the infrastructure if they would been delivered sooner.
Time to send the super spies in to kill members of the leadership in a way that makes it look natural.I know, it was a rash thing to say I’m incredibly sad to see it’s being allowed to go on, those videos are heartbreaking.
Even now he isn't talking about preparing an attack on Ukraine, but about preparing for an attack by Ukraine on Belarus. To me it looks like he keeps trying dragging it along while not actually entering Ukraine/ the war. I'm quite sure that he right now hopes for Putin to fall before he can be forced to enter the warHe's been evading direct involvement by the Belarus military since February but even his near-magical ability to do feck all while appearing to be supportive of Putin has its limits, especially since he can't keep balancing between Russia & the West like he did previously. Putin is in a zugzwang so he may force Lukashenko to move... but we'll only know for sure when it happens.
Even now he isn't talking about preparing an attack on Ukraine, but about preparing for an attack by Ukraine on Belarus. To me it looks like he keeps trying dragging it along while not actually entering Ukraine/ the war. I'm quite sure that he right now hopes for Putin to fall before he can be forced to enter the war
Being part of the shared Russian/Belarussian troops might be the safest place for a Russian mobilized soldier for some time, until somehow either this common troops enter Ukraine together or the Russian part of them on its own.
What is this sick constraint that partners are putting on Ukraine by not allowing them to attack Russian military bases inside Russia? They can carpet bomb the civilians but got forbid Ukraine retaliates on military targets? Every constraint is seen as a sign of weakness and gives them confidence they’ll get away with it and sure they do.
Lukashenko is talking about Ukraine planning an attack on Belarus. He says the common Belarussian/Russian troops will be deployed on the border to prevent that. He isn't planning an attack himself.Their own troops will be deployed to prevent their own troops from starting on the Ukranian troops? Is that what they are saying?
Yes, I know he's talking about that, but honestly, that's the most unlikely scenario. I was taking the piss saying that the only troops likely to attack are his own.Lukashenko is talking about Ukraine planning an attack on Belarus. He says the common Belarussian/Russian troops will be deployed on the border to prevent that. He isn't planning an attack himself.
What's stopping Kyiv being flattened like Grozny or Aleppo? (I've not been following the news...)
On one of the Russian propaganda channels featured complaints that people weren’t being told that Ukraine are striking in Russia west of Belgorod, and the mayor of some town was the one to inform people.What is this sick constraint that partners are putting on Ukraine by not allowing them to attack Russian military bases inside Russia? They can carpet bomb the civilians but got forbid Ukraine retaliates on military targets? Every constraint is seen as a sign of weakness and gives them confidence they’ll get away with it and sure they do.
This makes no sense at all. It is like saying Russia should have given nuclear weapons to Iraq or Vietnam, or Cuba (they did for a few months). There are good reasons why countries do not give nuclear weapons to other countries and should remain so. 9 too many countries have nuclear weapons already.Nah, I’m just tired seeing Russia get away with everything basically. I’m not suggesting attacking Russia or anything though. It’s not meant to be used as it would be a deterrence from Russia acting stupid. They have given up their nukes by the way as part of the agreement that they would be protected.
to rest.Dude seriously needs to get laid.
Belgorod they can reach with their own ammunition and weapons but when it comes to western supplied HIMARS/MLRS they had a chain around their neck until today at least and it was one of the main reasons they are yet to be provided with mid-to-long range systems like ATACMS.On one of the Russian propaganda channels featured complains that people weren’t being told that Ukraine are striking in Russia west of Belgorod, and the mayor of some town was the one to inform people.
No idea if it’s true, of course. Seems strange to claim they’re doing it if they aren’t, what if they go ahead and do it? You claimed it was already happening so why would there be a big response?
Dude seriously needs to get laid.
Imo nuclear weapons should be on the table now to be delivered to Ukraine. Enough is enough.