Boycott
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2013
- Messages
- 6,330
Pretty good speech by Biden just ended
“We only want to keep people in Donbas safe…”A second set of attacks on Lviv in the last thirty minutes.
We have a friend who returned only yesterday with her toddler son, because being alone in Poland had taken its toll and Lviv appeared safe. Gonna be another huge of refugees should Russia make those in Lviv feel unsafe.
Glad our in-laws got their visas yesterday.
As I thought, Putin has moved beyond the pale for NATO and the West. I don't think sanctions will be lifted for as long as he remains in power, be it weeks, months or years.
I don't think they will be lifted either since the purpose of using sanctions has changed. Pre-invasion, they were used as a carrot and stick approach to modulating Putin's behavior. Post-invasion, they are being used to destabilize and destroy Putin's power until he is removed. Therefore, Putin attempting to withdraw from Ukraine wouldn't alleviate the sanctions.
If that includes Crimea then sure.What if Putin said he would take his troops out of Ukraine only if the sanctions were lifted. Do you think the West would agree to this?
And they tidy up all their mess. Gonna need a lot of dustpans and brushes.If that includes Crimea then sure.
Russia is going to lose its mind over this, but they previously claimed that Biden stole the election so they really don't have any room to get mad.
That being said, it doesn't really help things.
The Ukrainian reaction is tepid too.
This is so not convincing.
I read somewhere the western response could be against russian affiliated assets in other countries so it wasn't a direct NATO - Russia thing. Eg Wagner group getting wiped out by a cruise missile or two.Russians may very well use chemical weapons. They used them in Syria and the West did nada. NATO will not get involved. The risk of escalation to nuclear is too big
I might have a slight crush on this woman.
What if Putin said he would take his troops out of Ukraine only if the sanctions were lifted. Do you think the West would agree to this?
Russia is going to lose its mind over this, but they previously claimed that Biden stole the election so they really don't have any room to get mad.
That being said, it doesn't really help things.
The Ukrainian reaction is tepid too.
The Ukrainian reaction is tepid too.
Russia is going to lose its mind over this, but they previously claimed that Biden stole the election so they really don't have any room to get mad.
That being said, it doesn't really help things.
This is what I've been wondering. The West has supplied a load of weapons but mostly hand weapons and drones. Which is good but where's the really good sht at? Ok they cant set up a no fly zone but what about more anti missile systems. Tanks. Planes. Long range missiles etc. If we really want Ukraine to flatten the Russian army they need to more no? Think what damage they could do with a load of long range missiles that can take out the ships for instance or they could have taken out that convoy that was moving along at a mile an hour for like 3 weeks.
This is what I've been wondering. The West has supplied a load of weapons but mostly hand weapons and drones. Which is good but where's the really good sht at? Ok they cant set up a no fly zone but what about more anti missile systems. Tanks. Planes. Long range missiles etc. If we really want Ukraine to flatten the Russian army they need to more no? Think what damage they could do with a load of long range missiles that can take out the ships for instance or they could have taken out that convoy that was moving along at a mile an hour for like 3 weeks.
They can contract people to do it…They are not trained to use any of those systems and it would take months to years to do so. Hard to do in an active conflict.
Mercenaries?They can contract people to do it…
They are not trained to use any of those systems and it would take months to years to do so. Hard to do in an active conflict.
Is this true though? Obviously volunteers from the bakery wont have any idea but they have a trained military that I presume know how to fire missiles. Yeah might take them a bit to figure out new systems but not months/years. Send them to Poland for a couple of weeks training.Anti-aircraft missile systems have also been supplied - e.g. the UK's Starstreak system, which is the world's fastest short-range surface-to-air missile.
But we need to remember that there's no point in supplying weapons that the Ukrainians haven't been trained to use, or can't be easily learnt how to use. Also, it's more difficult to transport into Ukraine big and bulky items that can't be hidden in a car boot or inside a civilian van. Anything transporting a tank, for example, could much easily be identified from the air and attacked.
Is this true though? Obviously volunteers from the bakery wont have any idea but they have a trained military that I presume know how to fire missiles. Yeah might take them a bit to figure out new systems but not months/years. Send them to Poland for a couple of weeks training.
With regards to getting the systems in. Yeah that seems difficult. But again. Is this impossible or just difficult? Our intelligence probably know exactly where the Russians are. Just need to figure it out.
Understandable from the Ukranian POV. It's just empty tough talk from Biden aimed at a domestic audience who fall for such things.
No change of policy to be seen.
Using these weapons is easy, a child could do it. Maintaining them long term, however, they would need training. SAMs and any kind of RPGs or wire-guided missile is literally point and shoot. We should be sending them the “disposable” type of weaponry for this reason. Javelins, any Close Combat Missile System – (CCMS) TOW (Tube-Launched, Optically Tracked, Wireless-Guided and Tube-Launched, Optically Tracked, Wire-Guided) Missile is a bit more complicated but not much. That’s probably why the Polish MiGs were turned down too: who’s going to maintain them?They are not trained to use any of those systems and it would take months to years to do so. Hard to do in an active conflict.
To be fair, the question he was responding to was asking about, among other things, tanks and planes.Using these weapons is easy, a child could do it. Maintaining them long term, however, they would need training. SAMs and any kind of RPGs or wire-guided missile is literally point and shoot. We should be sending them the “disposable” type of weaponry for this reason. Javelins, any Close Combat Missile System – (CCMS) TOW (Tube-Launched, Optically Tracked, Wireless-Guided and Tube-Launched, Optically Tracked, Wire-Guided) Missile is a bit more complicated but not much. That’s probably why the Polish MiGs were turned down too: who’s going to maintain them?