Zlatattack
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2017
- Messages
- 7,374
What's next delete Russia from the Atlas?
It's getting ridiculous. I think companies are looking to appear to be doing the right thing, rather than doing the right thing.
What's next delete Russia from the Atlas?
Someone still flies mig 21
I mean, we have to talk about the numbers numbers in this play by Abramovich.
That's what - 3,5 billion pounds or so? What did he pay for Chelsea when he bought them?
Also, all debts, loans etc. will be erased, personally financed by him. What's the total for him here? 10 billion?!
The end of an era in world football. So far the unprecedented king of "big enough personal wallet = trophies". He started this. Good fecking riddance! ..
This is sale is many things:
1) Absolutely the right thing to do
2) A man desperate to get the feck out as clean as possible
3) A man washing the blood off his hands with money
4) A man who smells sanctions in the near distance
I hope Bojo sanctions his ass and freeze all his accounts, assets, property in the UK. Still donating the net proceeds (after due process not involving Roman) to a multi billion pound, legit charity. For the victims of the moneys origin and history in the first place.
Edit: Also, the "war" part. This is a man who's not moving back to Russia after this is over. He's desperate to not cut all ties with the west.
What's wrong about it?It's getting ridiculous. I think companies are looking to appear to be doing the right thing, rather than doing the right thing.
It's getting ridiculous. I think companies are looking to appear to be doing the right thing, rather than doing the right thing.
It's getting ridiculous. I think companies are looking to appear to be doing the right thing, rather than doing the right thing.
You knew all along and you did feck all to stop it, Pooh. A special place in hell awaits for you too.
A lot still have these, but for nato country to be operating it is practically useless.You'd be surprised at how many countries still operate the Mig-21.
What's wrong about it?
Oh, if you think that's a breach of the Geneva Convention, then read this official statement on their official account...
I mean, we have to talk about the numbers numbers in this play by Abramovich.
That's what - 3,5 billion pounds or so? What did he pay for Chelsea when he bought them?
Also, all debts, loans etc. will be erased, personally financed by him. What's the total for him here? 10 billion?!
The end of an era in world football. So far the unprecedented king of "big enough personal wallet = trophies". He started this. Good fecking riddance! ..
This is sale is many things:
1) Absolutely the right thing to do
2) A man desperate to get the feck out as clean as possible
3) A man washing the blood off his hands with money
4) A man who smells sanctions in the near distance
I hope Bojo sanctions his ass and freeze all his accounts, assets, property in the UK. Still donating the net proceeds (after due process not involving Roman) to a multi billion pound, legit charity. For the victims of the moneys origin and history in the first place.
Edit: Also, the "war" part. This is a man who's not moving back to Russia after this is over. He's desperate to not cut all ties with the west.
I believe it's "all net proceeds", meaning most likely sale price minus debt, minus purchase price. If sale price is £2b it therefore would be around £350m donated.
Interesting as well as the donation terminology is "victims of the war". Certainly not specifically Ukrainians.
So they’re not independent after all? If they can’t even condemn genuine evil. You’re a complete joke I must say.You shouldn't be. India has a long history of not taking sides, it didn't take sides in the cold war either. India has deep seated military ties with Russia too. These countries jumping to condemn Russia have nothing to lose economically or politically from it. India does. How many of them jumped to condemn their Western allies when they wage illegal wars? Ultimately nations look out for their own best interests - India's best interest is in remaining neutral. The world is changing, all the wealth is not all horded in Europe and America. In 20-30 years time there will be as much wealth in Asian and African markets as the Western world. Countries like India can now afford to walk an independent path without repercussions.
Elaborate please.
It assumes that everyone in Russia supports Putin. We all know Russian people aren't free to express themselves politically, it's a dictatorship.
The other day a Russian tennis player wrote on a camera - "no war please". Soon people like him won't have a platform to earn on, let alone express themselves. It's a matter of scheduling. Had he been knocked out of this tournament, he'd have been probably cancelled by the next.
Sanction the state, sanction people with close political ties, put on the financial sanctions but this "cancelling" of Russia and everyone Russian is disturbing.
Roman and Putin will see themselves as victims no doubt
You shouldn't be. India has a long history of not taking sides, it didn't take sides in the cold war either. India has deep seated military ties with Russia too. These countries jumping to condemn Russia have nothing to lose economically or politically from it. India does. How many of them jumped to condemn their Western allies when they wage illegal wars? Ultimately nations look out for their own best interests - India's best interest is in remaining neutral. The world is changing, all the wealth is not all horded in Europe and America. In 20-30 years time there will be as much wealth in Asian and African markets as the Western world. Countries like India can now afford to walk an independent path without repercussions.
Exactly, it's not like Europe won't feel the economical consequences of their sanctionsI think he can feel that way if he like.
It’s more noble to stand up for what is right irrespective of the impact on yourself. Sitting on the fence of inaction is pretty inexcusable under the circumstances
Fair enough, I clearly need to get to know more Ukrainians in that case
Europe has plenty to lose from condemning Russia.You shouldn't be. India has a long history of not taking sides, it didn't take sides in the cold war either. India has deep seated military ties with Russia too. These countries jumping to condemn Russia have nothing to lose economically or politically from it. India does. How many of them jumped to condemn their Western allies when they wage illegal wars? Ultimately nations look out for their own best interests - India's best interest is in remaining neutral. The world is changing, all the wealth is not all horded in Europe and America. In 20-30 years time there will be as much wealth in Asian and African markets as the Western world. Countries like India can now afford to walk an independent path without repercussions.
The start and end of your post are completely contradictory. If we could 'walk an independent path', we'd have called the cnut out. We can't because we rely too much on him which is why I said us abstaining is understandable. Doesn't make it any less disgusting though and of course I feel that given what's happening.You shouldn't be. India has a long history of not taking sides, it didn't take sides in the cold war either. India has deep seated military ties with Russia too. These countries jumping to condemn Russia have nothing to lose economically or politically from it. India does. How many of them jumped to condemn their Western allies when they wage illegal wars? Ultimately nations look out for their own best interests - India's best interest is in remaining neutral. The world is changing, all the wealth is not all horded in Europe and America. In 20-30 years time there will be as much wealth in Asian and African markets as the Western world. Countries like India can now afford to walk an independent path without repercussions.
Exactly, it's not like Europe won't feel the economical consequences of their sanctions
I'm not sure he'd be that brazen. However there are lots of Russian victims in this affair.
So they’re not independent after all? If they can’t even condemn genuine evil. You’re a complete joke I must say.
The start and end of your post are completely contradictory. If we could 'walk an independent path', we'd have called the cnut out. We can't because we rely too much on him which is why I said us abstaining is understandable. Doesn't make it any less disgusting though and of course I feel that given what's happening.
For a start they'd be hypocrites for condemning Putin when they're doing much worse in Kashmir and have done for 40+ years.
Secondly, they'd be pretty within their right to ask where the whole world was in condemnation and sanctions when China annexed Indian territory multiple times over the last couple of years.
Thirdly, they've sat back and worked with loads of other countries who have commited crimes equal to or greater than those commited by Putin in Ukraine today, so why would they make an exception now.
Lets not go on a tangent though.
I can't believe i'm a Pakistani defending India's politicans. The world is truly FUBAR.
So it’s more whataboutism
There's a separate thread for this.For a start they'd be hypocrites for condemning Putin when they're doing much worse in Kashmir and have done for 40+ years.
Secondly, they'd be pretty within their right to ask where the whole world was in condemnation and sanctions when China annexed Indian territory multiple times over the last couple of years.
Thirdly, they've sat back and worked with loads of other countries who have commited crimes equal to or greater than those commited by Putin in Ukraine today, so why would they make an exception now.
Lets not go on a tangent though.
I can't believe i'm a Pakistani defending India's politicans. The world is truly FUBAR.
So Kherson does seem to have fallen to the Russians:
I'm guessing that's the point. It's unlikely a charity will have its assets frozen though.How would we ever genuinely know though
Difficult when Putin is bombing everything in sightThis is very sad and disturbing, the optimist in me hoped the Ukrainians would hold their major cities.
That's precisely what it is. After all, who wants to be the off man out in doing nothing when other companies are viewed by the public as taking action.
Make your own conclusions, it's very on trend nowadays anyway to ignore what was said and instead project what you want to say.
It was a matter of time I reckon. Not necessarily this thread, but on Reddit I was already seeing people get a little giddy thinking it was almost over.This is very sad and disturbing, the optimist in me hoped the Ukrainians would hold their major cities.
Instead you have people moaning about EA removing Russian teams from FIFA 22I don’t want to say anything. I’m simply not for making excuses for people/countries not willing to do the right thing.