I am too busy to participate in the match day thread, and frankly, I think there's too much fog of war to take any news at face value or to comment on it. Consider these headlines for context:
I usually don't comment on such news, but I find it to be clearly unreliable.
- NBC NEWS, JUNE 12: "Ukraine claims first gains in its counteroffensive against Russia" https://nbcnews.com/news/world/ukraine-claims-first-gains-counteroffensive-russia-rcna88789
- NBC NEWS, AUG 31: "Ukrainian forces make gains on front line, Kyiv says. The breakthrough, if it holds, would be a vindication for Ukraine" https://nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-ukraine-war-counteroffensive-breakthough-crimea-rcna102799
- NBC NEWS, SEPT 7: "Ukrainian counteroffensive is making 'tangible progress' against Russia, Blinken tells NBC News. 'I think we are seeing real forward movement'" https://nbcnews.com/news/world/ukraine-counteroffensive-progress-russia-blinken-interview-rcna103681
- NBC NEWS, NOV 3: Biden administration officials "are worried that Ukraine is running out of forces", and Ukraine "only has until the end of the year" before "urgent discussions" are necessary. https://nbcnews.com/news/world/us-european-officials-broach-topic-peace-negotiations-ukraine-sources-rcna123628
As someone who focuses on the bigger picture, I admit that I struggle to understand the strategic necessity of promising NATO membership to Ukraine. It seems illogical to me. Expanding NATO into countries with unstable conditions or those adjacent to potentially hostile neighbors increases the risk to American lives, given United States' obligation to defend each new member state. The only way this makes sense is from Lockheed's, Boeing's, Raytheon's, Northrop's and Halliburton's point of view.
NATO membership isn't being prioritized for them. As a sovereign state, they are eligible to apply for it without any coercion or intimidation to prevent them from handling their own affairs by their neighbor.
If you're interested in the bigger picture then you should consider why Putin doesn't want a strong and stable democratic state populated with considerable Russian speakers right on his own border - he is after all an authoritarian strong man who suppresses democracy in Russia to preserve his own life, because he knows a Russian population who see freedom in Ukraine will want the same for themselves; something that would lead to him being overthrown and probably killed in the process.
The bits about defense contractors is also not accurate. Unlike China and Russia, who have the luxury of nationalizing their respective defense industrial bases, the US as a capitalist nation doesn't have such a luxury and must instead rely on the private companies within the US to help generate the military hardware needed to be prepared for potential conflicts. Its therefore simply capitalism 101 that the US creates contracts with companies to supply them with what is needed.