Oranges038
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2020
- Messages
- 14,845
He's way off. But it's funny to watch them two argue like two lads after a feed of pints.
I have seen nothing to suggest he could. Even if his studio character is the hothead, and he plays into that, which he obviously does, you would imagine he'd at least occasionally show a bit of tactical insight if he had any. So yeah, I think he has a very primitive perspective on the game.
Exactly.If Ole was here that would have been roundly labelled a shocking performance
Without being rude, I think you have been sucked in.
He knows what people expect of him and he is cashing in. Do you really believe Roy Keane doesn't understand any of the nuanced tactical aspects of football? He has literally managed moderately well in the Premier League and has his Uefa Pro badges following a career where he was often dictating most of the play.
Come on guys this was an abysmal showing. Ole or no Ole.
Sucked in? There's no great subterfuge going on here. Keane might understand the tactical nuances but he's never shown himself to be capable of articulating them or providing any proper tactical analysis over the years.
Yes he plays up the curmudgeony stuff a bit but he's not hiding his light under a bushel for cash.
It's fair to say that, but Ole had little experience himself. He should never have been in this job. Those coaches might still get sacked when Rangnick comes in. Someone has to train and coach the players while we wait for new management.I'm pretty sure Keane has questioned things Ole has said in interviews before, multiple times. He's certainly been really critical of a lot of our performances under Ole, but same as Neville never gone into Ole for them.
But that's par for the course really. I think it's totally fair enough what the likes of Keane and Scholes clearly feel about the rest of the coaching staff still at the club. Ole appointed a load of clueless young coaches into key roles, and delegated most of his job to them, and they cant now be allowed to slink away while only Ole loses his job.
Having followed Keane as both a pundit and manager for years, nothing I've ever heard him say indicates anything other than a shallow knowledge of football beyond "character" and "effort".
You don't need to have a keen football mind to be a good footballer, get your coaching badges or indeed get (limited) decent results as a manager at the level Keane did some 13 years ago with Sunderland.
There's certainly a performative element to his public persona but that shouldn't be mistaken as a sign of hidden depth.
Was a far more intelligent player and did much better as a coach when given the opportunity.
After Rui Faria left us under Mou we’ve had similar coaching staff I think. Funnily enough we’ve won sod all since he left.I'm pretty sure Keane has questioned things Ole has said in interviews before, multiple times. He's certainly been really critical of a lot of our performances under Ole, but same as Neville never gone into Ole for them.
But that's par for the course really. I think it's totally fair enough what the likes of Keane and Scholes clearly feel about the rest of the coaching staff still at the club. Ole appointed a load of clueless young coaches into key roles, and delegated most of his job to them, and they cant now be allowed to slink away while only Ole loses his job.
He’s completely wrong on the Ronaldo situation. Was embarrassing. He had a point regarding the Carrick stuff and the lack of planning etc and the jobs for the boys thing.
I’m also guessing we took more points of Liverpool,City and Chelsea last season
Aye, the Pro license does cover systems of play and tactical application etc, but it's only one small part of a very holistic approach to management. You spend time on communication, the financial side of the game, a lot of time on training drills, recruitment,marketing, prep work, managing staff, physical conditioning, and plenty more. So while the top badge gives a brilliant insight into managing a club (and it does cover tactical theory and application), it's not necessarily going to turn you into Sacchi.
The coach argument is fair, but the first point I don't agree with. On the pitch and off the pitch is such a different world that being a more intelligent player doesn't necessarily translate into having a better tactical insight. While I don't think Neville is anything special, Keane has never shown any insight as a pundit. He might have a far better understanding than Neville, but it doesn't mean much if he doesn't share it. At least as a pundit.
So you think he cannot articulate something he knows very well.
He doesn't seem like an unarticulate person to me but okay?
I reckon the massive bag of cash is more a factor but sure.
The idea that this is all a big act for Sky is hilarious.
Get in there Keane. Don't care if he makes sense as long as he's shouting down carras
After Rui Faria left us under Mou we’ve had similar coaching staff I think. Funnily enough we’ve won sod all since he left.
You’re giving him way too much credit. The reality is Keane is just old school.Laugh away.
Roy Keane is, all the way to the bank.
Laugh away.
Roy Keane is, all the way to the bank.
Well yeah, Chelsea and Liverpool were utter dogshit last season as we just mentioned, hence how we somehow ended 2nd on just 74 fecking points. Oh, and despite Chelsea and Liverpool being wank, we took 3 points in total from our 4 games against them. So far we have 1 from 2 so not far off.
As I also said before we are likely in my opinion to end up on a similar points total to last year.
Ok mate. You can keep your little fantasy.
1. I do not think he is Sacchi, I think he has a good enough tactical understanding on football that he could offer a tactical breakdown on certain aspects, considering you get that on this forum and thousands of others I think that is a fair shout. The fact that he rarely offers anything in that way probably means he thinks it benefits him not to. I reckon as a motivator for that the fact that he earns loads of money to play the character who just moans about belief and other such things is a pretty good one.
2. I agree that it means nothing if he does not share it. I am not defending him, I am actually pointing to the fact that I think it is worse that he willingly chooses to play this caricature is worse than being genuinely ignorant.
"Fantasy"
As me or anyone could care less.
The fact that you think someone would not play up to their reputation because it plays well on TV and makes a ton of money is what is more laughable. Graeme Souness has spent over a decade doing it.
I said he does play up to the camera. That's not the argument. Move the goal posts some more there.
Did he ever say it how it was when it was evident Ole needed to get the feck out?I appreciate people like Keane who say it how it is. I'm bored of listening to people with agendas or bias skirting around the issues or burying their head in the sand.
Spot onWhat was Keane wrong about today? I thought he was spot on
Except he didn't say it how it was when ole was there (unlike scholes), because he is his mate. Which kind of defeats the purpose of him because if he can't do that then what's the pointI appreciate people like Keane who say it how it is. I'm bored of listening to people with agendas or bias skirting around the issues or burying their head in the sand.