It is a tragedy. Keane is far and away the best person to bring on staff at Man Utd. Two paths. One is fire Ole and hire him as manager. The other option is as Harry Redknapp suggests, hire him as a coach. While the manager bit may have detractors, likely Roy himself as he and Ole are close, the coach path keeps Ole, and still goes a long way to fixing what Ole can't or won't. It is a way that Ole stays, there is no severance payout, and Manchester United, after far too long a wait, finally have the steel heart of a Corkman beating within the team again. It is a move that Ole can make on his own, and one that will surely save his job, so the question is, why hasn't he done it?
One answer to that is that Sir Alex is casting the black ball. Forgetting "...all the things they accomplished together" as Sayros so accurately states. A petulant old man whose most brilliant move, among many, was to beat Kenny Dalgliesh to signing Keane from Forest. If it is true, he should be greatly diminished in the eyes of Man Utd supporters. Alex Ferguson, more than any other person, does know that Roy Keane will change this. If he vetoes what is best for United, by spurning the very man he most owes the "Sir" in his name to, that is disgraceful.
I know that Keane himself is not free of petulance and the tragic gap between these two, who made each other, may be difficult to bridge. But it has to be.
I favor the Ole/Roy in the dugout combo. I remember when Roy was paired with Martin O'Neill, first with Ireland, then with Villa. Martin had it put to him by a reporter that the approach was going to be "good cop/bad cop". He said "No, more like bad cop/really really bad cop". We are desperate need of that really, really bad cop now.