Tevez was on a par with Rooney. Tevez was double the player Berbatov could ever wish to be.
It's impossible to understand why Man City had no worries investing in Carlos with his 3rd party ownership, yet Man Utd walked away from the deal due to that reason. Maybe Fergie didn't want to empower the agent too much.
Signing Berbatov ahead of Tevez set the club back a few years in terms of levels of pergormances
But the problem was that he played best on the same position as Rooney, But when you have a player of that level you should tweak you tactics to fit him in. I'm not including Ronaldo as he left in 2009, 1 year after the CL w8n
Nani Carrick Scholes Giggs
Tevez
Rooney
Subs - Berbatov, Park, Fletcher etc
Agreed.
Seems to me that because of the way Tevez left and the Fergie poster incident, it has distorted people's views of how good he was for us.
Ok, as a trio, Ronaldo, Tevez and Rooney didn't have as many combinations as the Liverpool front 3 but the team won in one season what it will take Liverpool to win in 2 seasons and played a different style in a different time.
The workrate of Tevez and Rooney helped to allow Ronaldo to be his incredible best without the defensive responsibilities. Different players and different way of playing to Liverpool so it's a false equivalency.
Tevez was superb for us and I was gutted to see the club mess him about and then let him leave.
The fact United did try at the last minute to sign him probably points to the sudden realisation of the arrogant approach being taken to assume he wouldn't want to go anywhere else and we'd have our own way eventually... then the PR spin on the initial sum not being good value... blimey, we signed up to those terms and won the Champions League with him lasting more of the final than Rooney, being instrumental in getting Drogba sent off and scoring a huge penalty.
As much as I liked Berbatov, he set the team backwords in his first season. So much so that Fergie began dropping him after Christmas and I remember the BBC showed a heat map illustrating how the biggest casualty of the Berba signing was Ronaldo's average positioning changing from centre forward (mostly) to deeper and wider ...... shock horror, his goal ratio dropped off massively until Berba was dropped and Fergie tried to recreate the system from the previous season.
As for Berba... he did really well in latter seasons but the fundamental issue is that both him and Rooney dropped deeper and slowed down the attack occupying the same positions on the pitch. This is evident with Rooney's best goal season a year or two after when he was released from sharing and could be the sole focal point....
And while I get the logic that Berba was too good for Fergie to let him go to City, it seemed mad to me at the time to spend a club record sum on the verge of a financial crash on a player that fundamentally broke the attacking structure of a double winning team.
Tactically, one of Fergie's biggest mistakes in my opinion. All teams need evolution but he went too far then tried to undo his mistake after just a few months.