Ekeke
Full Member
LVG is just stubbornly using Rooney, trying to find a role to keep him in the team somewhere even though he doesnt deserve to be
We play him in midfield: "He needs to be up front where the action is"
We play him as the main striker: "He needs good support. He's best as a 10"
We play him as a 10: "He needs to be closer to goal where he can create goals. He needs to be the main man"
We play him as a winger: "He needs to be in front of the goal. He's wasted on the wing"
Wherever he plays, people always suggest a better position. He must be the only player in our squad who has no preferred position.
In the post match presser, when asked about Rooney's performance, he stated that his captaincy was far more important in value to the team than his performance (good or bad) in today's match. Pretty much confirms to me that Rooney does seem untouchable.
He is the typical jack of trades but master of none, our attacking John O'shea. The difference is we shunt him around because we have better options in every other position and this where he will hinder our play the least. Since LvG is too scared to drop him then at the very least this is how we solve this particular problem.We play him in midfield: "He needs to be up front where the action is"
We play him as the main striker: "He needs good support. He's best as a 10"
We play him as a 10: "He needs to be closer to goal where he can create goals. He needs to be the main man"
We play him as a winger: "He needs to be in front of the goal. He's wasted on the wing"
Wherever he plays, people always suggest a better position. He must be the only player in our squad who has no preferred position.
So hypotetically Giggs is more worried about his friends than actually doing something proactiv with the team? If this was the situation and Giggs had that choice I like to think he'd drop him and not worry about Rooney or Neville. He wants to become a top manager and that wont happen if he's catering to his friends besides, what could Neville do anyway?Agree it needs careful handling. He needs the board to help him. Giggs won't because he's friendly with Wayne and won't want to upset his friend and business partner GNev by helping to boot Rooney. It's a conflict of interest with Giggs so that can't help the situation. Ed Woodward is the only one that LVG could/should trust as everyone else seems to have their own agenda imo.
I'd rather we stop trying him in so many positions and just accept that he's not good any more.
But will he be better than Young?He was better than Memphis...
But will he be better than Young?
We're literally just shunting him around the team, trying to find a position where he can do the least damage at this stage
Think that's where he'll end up for a while. LVG must have had enough of him in that No.10 role to shunt him out to the left - surely?
Id like to see this team as well.If we won't drop Rooney, I'd to see us move back to a formation similar to last year's 4-3-3 and put Rooney on the wing. It would look like this:
------------------De Gea------------
Darmian--Smalling----Jones----Blind
---------------Schneiderlin---------
------Herrera------------BFS-----------
-Mata----------Martial----------Rooney
When BFS tires, we can bring on Fellaini, where he was most effective last year. We can bring on Depay every game at around the 60th minute for Rooney, until Depay proves he is clearly the better option (which shouldn't take long in my opinion).
We have these, already?Yeah our Herrera lovers and Memphis haters can join to the party that this is good idea.
Just to be disappointed in the end because Memphis will take number 10. role
That's very untrue though, isn't it?He is the typical jack of trades but master of none, our attacking John O'shea. The difference is we shunt him around because we have better options in every other position and this where he will hinder our play the least. Since LvG is too scared to drop him then at the very least this is how we solve this particular problem.
In the post match presser, when asked about Rooney's performance, he stated that his captaincy was far more important in value to the team than his performance (good or bad) in today's match. Pretty much confirms to me that Rooney does seem untouchable.
In the post match presser, when asked about Rooney's performance, he stated that his captaincy was far more important in value to the team than his performance (good or bad) in today's match. Pretty much confirms to me that Rooney does seem untouchable.
I don't hate Memphis, but LvG keeps going on about foreign players need to be phased in as they might take time to settle to the lifestyle and the style of football, yet he has thrown Memphis in at the deep end to sink or swim and at the moment he is sinking. I would have brought him on as a impact sub to start with.We have these, already?
I'm not a Memphis hater, but I think he should be dropped and taken out of the limelight a bit, until he adapts better to the league. His performances have been woeful, tbf.
He's undoubtedly talented, but he's struggled to adapt thus far. Onwards and upwards though. I'm sure he'll improve.
I refuse to believe this could possibly be true. Surely?
As quoted by Miguel Delaney on his twitter account, Van Gaal responded to the question (of Rooney's form) saying:
“I can never answer that question. When I answer in positive way, it’s maybe not good. When negative, it’s in all the headlines.”
That sounds like someone who doesn't want to admit his captain is playing badly.This sounds a bit weak to me:
Yeah, it's not bonkers this way. If he ever said that his captaincy was more important than performance, this would be true lunacy.This sounds a bit weak to me:
Yep, can see the benefit to that tbf. And I don't necessarily think wanting Memphis out of the starting lineup equates to "haters" either. That's just a lazy generalisation.I don't hate Memphis, but LvG keeps going on about foreign players need to be phased in as they might take time to settle to the lifestyle and the style of football, yet he has thrown Memphis in at the deep end to sink or swim and at the moment he is sinking. I would have brought him on as a impact sub to start with.
There is another quote on Rooney. It goes "Rooney's position is very important to us as a captain and that is far more important than any evaluation of individual performance"
That very much sounds like the captain must play regardless of how he's playing b
VG could always choose a new captain. That way we could at least play with 11 men instead of 10.There is another quote on Rooney. It goes "Rooney's position is very important to us as a captain and that is far more important than any evaluation of individual performance"
That very much sounds like the captain must play regardless of how he's playing b
VG could always choose a new captain. That way we could at least play with 11 men instead of 10.
Can he not just be club captain without actually playing? He could be Honorary Club Captain if necessary.
He doesn't seem to do much as a captain on the pitch except to shout 'COME ON', and then passes the ball to the opposition for the umpteenth time.
He is the typical jack of trades but master of none, our attacking John O'shea. The difference is we shunt him around because we have better options in every other position and this where he will hinder our play the least. Since LvG is too scared to drop him then at the very least this is how we solve this particular problem.
Left wing is his absolute worst position. Better as a DM.
Oh he can. Imagine passing to opposition player near the boxI'd play him at right back.. he can't be worse than Darmian right now.
Played there during our most successful period.Left wing is his absolute worst position. Better as a DM.
- Only one of Memphis/Rooney at once