So, if it had been 75 million for Hazard, who has exactly the same downside as Lukaku that the post was about "that he has done nothing at international level" that the criticism "he has done nothing at international level" would be leveled against him?
I hate to break it to you, but United don't play in international competitions, and if you cast your mind back to our league and champions league winning teams, none of the players we had then had done anything at international level either.
So let's just put that notion that international performance has any relevenace to club football to bed as utter bollocks shall we?
Otherwise the likes of Messi, Auguero, Ronaldo, Tevez, Rooney, Scholes, Beckham, Giggs, Cantona, Stam and hundreds of other players would never have won anything because they would be playing for Barnsley or Stockport because "they haven't done anything at international level".
I don't know why you're comparing Hazard to Lukaku, tbh. One has been touted as a potential world-beating superstar, tore up the French league two seasons in a row and has some genuinely world class facets to his game, the other has had a very good time of it in league football in both Belgium and England thus far, but has never been expected to be an elite of his generation.
Hazard has a lot to do to be mentioned in the same breath as the true top dogs of club football.
With the international football snarc, you're plain and simply being purposely obtuse. It, along with the CL, will always be barometers that assess players as the full(er) product, or the real deal, if you wish.
@Fortitude I'm sorry but you're not making much sense with the above.
Lukaku isn't an exciting signing for me but he is guaranteed goals. The price isn't bad either. Not sure what's not to like with this deal bar it not being a continental based flair player.
If we sign him, of course I wish him/us the best and hope he can elevate himself to levels as yet unseen, but where we aspire to be and what he has brought to the table to date are some distance apart. Is Lukaku the guy to lead a CL campaign? When you put his name up against the strikers in the competition, does it match - does he look like he has the same pedigree as them?
And £75m is a lot of money. May well be there or thereabouts the going rate for a performing PL striker over a few seasons, but it is still a hell of a lot of money, and a bit more on top must surely open doors to the elite class of forwards.
Eden Hazard hasn't done much of note for Belgium too. Nor has Griezmann been setting the world on fire for France but they are elite players. Lukaku is younger than both and has ample scope for improvement.
As for your last line, which "elite talent" would you think is available who would be going for a reasonable price? We were about to break the bank on Morata so Lukaku is a great option too.
Frankly I have not been overly impressed by his technique but he sure knows to bang them in. Plus at this age he can be improved and can become a lethal player in his prime.
Hazard, I've already spoke on; Griezmann is a consistent CL performer and he's done well enough for France where logistics (covered in the Pogba threads) and their sheer depth and options are obviously able to curtail his intl. career.
Ample scope for improvement... so what do you think he can ultimately be? Do you think he can tidy up his game to the point he's par with a Drogba or.. I actually don't know who to insert here because his technical level is some way off the likes of Cole, Yorke or others who came in as one thing and came out as something majestically different. Do you think he will become proficient enough at combination football for our forwards following in off him to trust and run past and/or play off of?
About his goals, I don't know if it has been mentioned in this thread, but we will have to break teams down and won't be in open matches anywhere near as much as he's thrived in at Everton and WBA. Does he then have the skill and nous to still be as effective?