Moby
Dick
It was good while it lasted.By scoring a lot of goals.
Welcome to the strikers' graveyard.
It was good while it lasted.By scoring a lot of goals.
3 pts vs City count for as much as 3 vs Pool
Not happy with this even though I don't rate him as top class. End of the day, he's a goal scorer and especially one that's good at bullying the avg teams. 3 pts vs City count for as much as 3 vs Pool and with the wealth of creators at Chelsea, can see him getting 15-20 in the league which will get Chelsea lot of extra points that Werner and Co simply couldn't.
I'd rather he stayed away from the PL.
Keep on believingBruno doesn't score agains't the top 6 sides either but you still rate him. 15 open play goals plus 5 pens lets say thats 20 goals thats only 3 off what Harry Kane got last season and he takes penalties too.
He was literally our player ffsSome of the underrating of opposition players and overrating of United players is getting worse on the cafe.
Aside from the fact we’ve finished above you twice in a row in the league and will do so again this season. A flukey champions league means very little.The same story at the beginning of every season.
And then when the league progresses, United fans finally realise they are not in the class of Chelsea and need to strength.
When you say league, are you still talking about the real life one where we've finished above you in each of the last 2 seasons or is this some FM/FIFA season?The same story at the beginning of every season.
And then when the league progresses, United fans finally realise they are not in the class of Chelsea and need to strength.
But build them back up clapping their passesI hope he takes away Mount's and Havertz's confidence with his pointing
Fergie would be having kittens if he reads this.Aside from the fact we’ve finished above you twice in a row in the league and will do so again this season. A flukey champions league means very little.
Sir Alex consistently sacrificed success to build better sides, this rewriting of history to paint Sir Alex as a win any title at any cost doesn’t resemble reality.Fergie would be having kittens if he reads this.
Love it he's not even signing yet and the Chelsea lot are using him to shit on one of our players
Should check their posts on Lukaku when they thought they were getting Haaland
And he didn't do all that to have you gloating about finishing above Chelsea in less than a decade since his departure.Sir Alex consistently sacrificed success to build better sides, this rewriting of history to paint Sir Alex as a win any title at any cost doesn’t resemble reality.
You do realise SAF doesn’t post on here right? Are you saying Sir Alex judges the quality of sides based off of winning the CL or not? This is the man who took the harder way to beat Barca in 2011 by attacking them because he didn’t want Utd to defend their way to a European title. He was not a win at all cost manager, hence his youth development record. That is what made him great.And he didn't do all that to have you gloating about finishing above Chelsea in less than a decade since his departure.
Do you think he took comfort in finishing above Liverpool when Arsenal went unbeaten? Do you think Real fans give a single shite they finished above Barcelona in the season just gone?
If you want to dine on being the biggest club in the country then part of that is embracing the expectations that come with it.
Mount makes an perfect pass only for it to bounce 20 feet off Lukaku's toeBut build them back up clapping their passes
He becomes the player with the highest cumulative transfer fee of all time. Say it out loud and taste those words as they leave your mouth. Romelu Lukaku is the player in the world that has fetched the largest total sum of money over the course of his career. Ever. Romelu Lukaku. Him. How?
I can pretty comfortably assume he didn't treat merely finishing above another side like it's a trophy, which was the whole point of my initial response.You do realise SAF doesn’t post on here right? Are you saying Sir Alex judges the quality of sides based off of winning the CL or not? This is the man who took the harder way to beat Barca in 2011 by attacking them because he didn’t want Utd to defend their way to a European title. He was not a win at all cost manager, hence his youth development record. That is what made him great.
When Liverpool won the CL, Utd finished 3rd but comfortably above them. You should have finished 5th last season, the two seasons are scarily similar. Do you think Sir Alex viewed Liverpool as a better side or would swap 11s over what he was in the middle of building?
Who assumed we were singing Haaland?From the nonsensical cockiness of signing Haaland to spunking near enough 100m on Lukaku. He'll do well in the games you'd expect, but his overall play will be a negative.
Didn’t really mean the champions league means little although my post does read that way! I more meant that a champions league one off win doesn’t necessarily indicate a team is on the up and can just be a one off triumph.Fergie would be having kittens if he reads this.
Havertz isn't a pure 9, even the boy said it himself very recently, in his interview about Werner.Who assumed we were singing Haaland?
It was a clear no go from the off and even if it somehow happened we would have been a 2-3 year stepping stone on what is an obvious eventual path to Madrid.
That said I am a bit underwhelmed about signing Lukaku purely because of my belief in Havertz upfront.
But he isn’t representing Sir Alex? He’s pointing out that Utd have proven to be a better league side than Chelsea for quite a while now. I can see why a certain amount of Utd fans are fecked off reading how Chelsea will finish above us time and time again over 2, coming on 3 seasons based on nothing. All that comes back are excuses. If it’s not a transfer ban then it’s Frank needing the time Ole has then it’s because Frank was shit all along now to half a season Tuchel. It’s about time Chelsea actually go out and prove it in the EPL.I can pretty comfortably assume he didn't treat merely finishing above another side like it's a trophy, which was the whole point of my initial response.
But while you're here, out of curiosity, when does (in your opinion) Ole's 'progress' have to translate to silverware?
He's not but false 9 is well suited to the modern game. The last two PL Champions and 2 of the last 3 UCL winners going down that route is testament to that.Havertz isn't a pure 9, even the boy said it himself very recently, in his interview about Werner.
Too risky from a sheer numbers point for the club. Havertz scored 5 goals last season in the PL + CL combined.Who assumed we were singing Haaland?
It was a clear no go from the off and even if it somehow happened we would have been a 2-3 year stepping stone on what is an obvious eventual path to Madrid.
That said I am a bit underwhelmed about signing Lukaku purely because of my belief in Havertz upfront.
Ofcourse that looks bad in isolation but there was mitigating circumstances towards his troubles catching a bad dose of Covid and spending half the season under a manager that didn't know how to best utlisize him.Too risky from a sheer numbers point for the club. Havertz scored 5 goals last season in the PL + CL combined.
Has his first touch improved?
Yes, the clapping is to the point now.Has his first touch improved?
Mate, Ings would get you 20 goalsI’m not overly excited about the signing but with a few more sells we can write it off.
Tammy will be off next for almost half of what Lukaku cost.
If he bangs in 20 league goals then he’s worth the money. Simple as that. He gives us a totally different dimension though and he will dominate most defenders for strength. I’m worried about his link up play though and his conditioning will need to be spot on under Tuchel who won’t be afraid to drop him. Risky signing but he will have the full support of the fans now it’s done.
It’ll be good to see him score against Man Utd though and revisit the laughter on this topic.
But would he help revisiting the laughter on this page when he scores against us? I guess not.Mate, Ings would get you 20 goals
Mate, Ings would get you 20 goals
He only did that once and never scored more than 15 in any of his other seasons in the PL.
And in both his Inter seasons he scored at least 6 pens so they were both under 20 in the league as well if only counting from open play. The idea though is that he'd get better service, so same with Ings.Lukaku only scored over 20 goals once in the PL as well. His average goals per season in the PL is 16.
And in both his Inter seasons he scored at least 6 pens so they were both under 20 in the league as well if only counting from open play. The idea though is that he'd get better service, so same with Ings.