Vidyoyo
The bad "V"
Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.
Maybe it is us.
Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.
The last 10 international teams he’s scored against have been Switzerland , Iceland ,Scotland , Tunisia , Panama ,Costa Rica,Egypt ,Saudi Arabia ,Japan and Mexico.Belgium are not the best international team in the world.
And yeah he scores goals for them but I would bet it's mostly against fodder. He just doesn't do it in the big games.
Who did he score against at the World Cup? Tunisia and Panama?
Pretty good enviroment for a striker playing with De Bruyne and Hazard though.Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.
No. CR7 bulked up and became unstoppable. De Gea bulked up and became top 3 in the world
Someone really doesn’t like Rom, found this online.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Pioche10_/status/1055115989325627392/video/1
So in other words, a lot of very average sides with defenders who would play for relegation fodder for the most part?The last 10 international teams he’s scored against have been Switzerland , Iceland ,Scotland , Tunisia , Panama ,Costa Rica,Egypt ,Saudi Arabia ,Japan and Mexico.
The last 10 international teams he’s scored against have been Switzerland , Iceland ,Scotland , Tunisia , Panama ,Costa Rica,Egypt ,Saudi Arabia ,Japan and Mexico.
Shh. It does not suit the agenda.Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.
And if I decided to keep going Gibraltar was appearing in that list as well !So in other words, a lot of very average sides with defenders who would play for relegation fodder for the most part?
Maybe if they had an actual top striker they would actually have enough to win things. He's the weakest point in their attack by miles.Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.
Lukaku is taller of course, but he has much more (unnecessary) muscle everywhere. In terms of squats, bench press, lat pulls and basically everything, he would crush Ronaldo's numbers - and it really isn't needed when you are a footballer. He looks like a rugby-player and it's getting embarrassing. Slim down Lukaku, you're over-weight.
Maybe if they had an actual top striker they would actually have enough to win things. He's the weakest point in their attack by miles.
Not necessarily. But having a striker who isn't a hindrance in the vast majority of big games is a massive problem. Put Fergie in charge and Lukaku's exactly the type who would start 75% of games but then be benched for every single big game. You have to understand the guys limitations, and starting him in those games is a big problem because that's a big limitation of his. He can't perform in them.Yeah Belgium not winning anything is Lukaku’s fault .
Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.
Even if that were true, all that tells us is that he's better than Benteke and Batshuayi.Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.
We are putting steroids in his food.
wtf is our coaches giving him for training program?
Man, Giroud couldn't even get a shot away but France still won the cup.You figured it out mate. Or is it because Belgium are seriously lacking other candidates up front? Origi, Benteke and Batshuayi are bang average or worse. If Belgium had proper options up front, they could have challenged France this summer. You can get away with a shitty goalkeeper like Lloris, but you'll not win anything if your main focal point is dragging everyone else down. As mentioned before, during the World Cup Hazard and de Bruyne stopped passing for Lukaku in good positions because they knew he was going to screw everything up. Lukaku has 45 goals for Belgium, only two of them against a decent side in the qualifiers. Never scored a goal against a top-tier team in the WC or Euros. A brace against Croatia during the qualifiers in 2013 is his biggest feat, if you don't count the heroics against Gibraltar last season. I am not saying his international record isn't wonderful, because it really is on paper and I doubt players like Kane or Lewandowski would be that much better playing the same games, but it doesn't offer any value in terms of how things work in real life. Manchester United do not play the equivalent of Estonia, Finland, Gibraltar, Cyprus, Tunisia and Panama in the Premier League and Champions League. Belgium playing these sides are basically the same as 6th graders playing 3rd graders in the school-yard.
Man, Giroud couldn't even get a shot away but France still won the cup.
The last 10 international teams he’s scored against have been Switzerland , Iceland ,Scotland , Tunisia , Panama ,Costa Rica,Egypt ,Saudi Arabia ,Japan and Mexico.
Maybe they accidentally put some steroids in his foodWhat's the point of him being so bulked up? Do Man Utd staff members see an advantage that we are all missing...?
Maybe they accidentally put some steroids in his food
I wonder if all the criticism will motivate him? If he continues like this I can see the fans in the stadium turn on him completely. Could get really nasty for him.
"If Belgium had a better striker, they'd have challenged France."So, Lukaku is playing for Belgium = he is among the best players. Therefore, Giroud playing for the team that won they World Cup has to mean he is among the best players, according to your logic.
"If Belgium had a better striker, they'd have challenged France."
It is like the Striker scoring just four goals is the reason they couldn't challenge France. France had one that didn't even take a shot on target but still won. It seems football is a team sport.
it really makes you wonder whats going on.Tell me how with all our nutritionists, dietitians and sport scientists, is that allowed to happen? There is no way you're convincing me that is his optimal body weight/type.
Even the nutritionists aren't doing their job properly. From the executives to the nutritionists, you have to wonder how deep the problem really is.it really makes you wonder whats going on.
Lukaku was one of Belgium's best players. The guys in the final gets most of the adulation and deservedly so, but if you exclude them - I know, Lukaku was one of the best players overall too.Yes, it is a team sport, that is why Giroud was useful. He provided other things to his team, that Lukaku did not. Lukaku was not the sole reason that Belgium failed (other players, including Fellaini, were more detrimental in the semi vs France) of course, but he did not have a really good tournament either.
Pointless. We need to play Sanchez or Martial there if we're going to drop Lukaku.
No. CR7 bulked up and became unstoppable. De Gea bulked up and became top 3 in the world
Totally agree , rashford is terrible up top , can’t understand why he can’t try Sanchez up there (if fit) he played well up there pre season I thought .Pointless. We need to play Sanchez or Martial there if we're going to drop Lukaku.
Leading striker for the best international team in the world.
Maybe it is us.