RedStarUnited
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,308
He's our topscorer ffs, wake up!!
I never said he wasn't, he is still not a smart player.
He's our topscorer ffs, wake up!!
And yet you still have vids like this oneThat is just a flat out lie, We aren't in the 90s anymore, mid table teams are now playing pressing and attacking football. And this idea that he struggles against most teams because of his touch and technical play falls completely on its arse when actually scrutinized. Lukaku makes easy work of lesser opposition, these so called teams that park the bus against big clubs get destroyed by Lukaku on a regular basis. If anything his performance against big teams is what is lacking, not him playing against lesser opposition.
It's pretty obvious you've gone off the deep end on Lukaku when you are making points that go completely against reality. Lukaku has scored 34 goals against lesser opposition for us in his time here, and a solitary 1 goal against top opposition (2 if you count Real Madrid in the super cup) which was against Chelsea. The exact same thing happened at Everton where his big game record was shoddy.
Lukaku does not struggle against parked buses or lesser teams. Those are his speciality. This idea that he's a barely serviceable footballer with nothing going for him is nonsensical, and it's obviously based on the short term ism of his bad season. Last season he was one of our better players and looked to be improving the technical aspects, and he has been improving season upon season since his Everton days.
And yet you still have vids like this one
Thats from last season.
Absolutely spot on. I can only assume those defending him are related in some way. In 40 years of supporting United I've never seen a worse 'footballer' at the club that's given me laughs but for all the wrong reasonsHe's incredibly shit at football, and I mean incredibly. Not even Heskey class. He can't control a ball, his footballing brain is poor, he can't make a decent pass, he isn't a target. He is a poacher, he can score that's no doubt about it. But it's often against Reading, Newcastle and Malta. And often not match winning goals. How anyone who is watching football regularly can't see this, I can't understand. He can be our Chicharito but that's about it. Is he going to be our main striker in a Champions League final against Juventus or PSG? Hell no.
Oh again with the stats are you actually watching the games at all? Did you watch any game in the last 6 months? He's such a limited player it's painful to watch at times.Stick to gifs mate, that's what you're good at (or used to be).
Lukaku was 11th for big chances missed last season. You could make longer compilations for 10 other players.
Oh again with the stats are you actually watching the games at all? Did you watch any game in the last 6 months? He's such a limited player it's painful to watch at times.
I think he's a very good striker but with some obvious flaws. Definitely don't think he's anywhere near as bad as people in this thread make him out to be I mean we've had posters in here questioning if he should even be a professional footballer and if he should just give up and retire. Embarassing stuff. We're talking about a player who is the top goal scorer for his country and like I said he's scored 109 goals in the PL by 25 which is impressive.So you think he’s good enough?
How many of those goals were actually scored against a decent side?
And yet you still have vids like this one
Thats from last season.
This whole 'he was great last season' talk needs to stop. He scored less than Ibra did the year before and Ibra missed a bunch of sitters and got injured in March I think.
I think he's a very good striker but with some obvious flaws. Definitely don't think he's anywhere near as bad as people in this thread make him out to be I mean we've had posters in here questioning if he should even be a professional footballer and if he should just give up and retire. Embarassing stuff. We're talking about a player who is the top goal scorer for his country and like I said he's scored 109 goals in the PL by 25 which is impressive.
This whole 'he was great last season' talk needs to stop. He scored less than Ibra did the year before and Ibra missed a bunch of sitters and got injured in March I think.
His touch and poor hold up play are 100% relevant to the discussion on his performance.Anybody who thinks Lukaku's football brain is poor is not in a position to judge footballing intelligence. They clearly don't have any themselves.
The two-stage run for the goal was extremely clever, for example, and it's not an isolated example.
It's only his race and his poor touch that lead to accusations of him being stupid. And neither of those things are relevant to the discussion.
Lukaku recieved 22 "big chances" in the PL last season and scored 11 of them. Zlatan (despite being injured from March on as you say) recieved 23 "big chances" and scored 7 of them.
For further context Ibra was getting a chance every 21 minutes with a goal conversion rate of 14.8%, Lukaku receiving a chance every 38 minutes with a goal conversion rate of 18.6%.
In other words when we say Lukaku was good last season it's in the context of the rest of the team being shite at creating anything. If Ibra had been recieving as few chances as Lukaku did last season then he would have clearly scored a lot less too.
There are a ton of things to fairly criticise Lukaku for but his goalscoring isn't one of them, he does that very well. If you want to downplay hiw good he was last season then I'd stick to focusing on his general play.
Perhaps Ibra was part of the reason Ibra received more chances and Lukaku was part of the reason Lukaku didn't
Anybody who thinks Lukaku's football brain is poor is not in a position to judge footballing intelligence. They clearly don't have any themselves.
The two-stage run for the goal was extremely clever, for example, and it's not an isolated example.
It's only his race and his poor touch that lead to accusations of him being stupid. And neither of those things are relevant to the discussion.
Why would there be a Rashford gif in the Lukaku thread?Funny that there is no gif of Rashford's fail in his thread. One guy has monopolised agendas.
Yes, he can. 7 assists last season.Just because he makes a good run sometimes, doesn't mean he has a great footballing brain. Of course, he can pull off a V-run (as we say in Sweden) but I'm not impressed. One of his major flaws is how slow he is to react to loose balls, which says a lot about his footballing brain. Also, he can't pick up a great pass. Mainly because he hasn't the skill set to do that but also because he can't see those passes. How many times has he gotten a great pass but he are on his heels and are too slow to react?
He was good up until November or so. Firstly with all the goals he scored early on, and then he was playing well and regularly our best player for a while even while he wasn't scoring. After that he fell away quite badly though, which obviously then got far worse this season.This whole 'he was great last season' talk needs to stop. He scored less than Ibra did the year before and Ibra missed a bunch of sitters and got injured in March I think.
Lukaku recieved 22 "big chances" in the PL last season and scored 11 of them. Zlatan (despite being injured from March on as you say) recieved 23 "big chances" and scored 7 of them.
For further context Ibra was getting a chance every 21 minutes with a goal conversion rate of 14.8%, Lukaku receiving a chance every 38 minutes with a goal conversion rate of 18.6%.
In other words when we say Lukaku was good last season it's in the context of the rest of the team being shite at creating anything. If Ibra had been recieving as few chances as Lukaku did last season then he would have clearly scored a lot less too.
There are a ton of things to fairly criticise Lukaku for but his goalscoring isn't one of them, he does that very well. If you want to downplay hiw good he was last season then I'd stick to focusing on his general play.
Anybody who thinks Lukaku's football brain is poor is not in a position to judge footballing intelligence. They clearly don't have any themselves.
The two-stage run for the goal was extremely clever, for example, and it's not an isolated example.
It's only his race and his poor touch that lead to accusations of him being stupid. And neither of those things are relevant to the discussion.
His touch and poor hold up play are 100% relevant to the discussion on his performance.
The term football intelligence is itself a stupid one. People are primarily referring to ability on and off the ball, it has nothing to do with intelligence per se
Well, Martial has as many as him this year, having played less minutes and in a less advanced position and Rashford has two less, but loads of assists as well. Lukaku is a decent poacher, but thats about it, he wont do stuff like Martials goal vs Cardiff or Rashfords assist vs Bournemouth
But very few have the football intelligence to execute it in a game environment as regularly as Lukaku.Ibra makes much better runs, which probably results in him being in more situations to get those 'big chances'. And then think about the goals Ibra made for himself like the outside the box shot vs Bournemouth away or Swansea. Lukaku simply doesn't bring this to the table.
It was a good run but its not 'extremely clever'. That is what forwards at all levels are taught to do for god sake.
I am actually questioning his intelligence to be honest. A player with his physical attributes should not be bullied as much as he does if he learned to use them intelligently.
Fair to him for getting this far in his career I guess.
Now i've seen it all!
And yet you still have vids like this one
Thats from last season.
But very few have the football intelligence to execute it in a game environment as regularly as Lukaku.
In interviews with squad members, Lukaku is often named as one of the most intelligent at United.
Control is a physical attribute, not a mental one.You must be joking or trying to be a WUM. Lukaku may be intelligent off the field and I do not know his IQ but on the field he is piss poor most of the time. As others have said he is always on his back foot and to be honest I am surprised that he got the goal against Newcastle as normally he would have either been offside or on the back foot. Of course he is a decent player otherwise he would not be playing for Belgium. The same as Fellaini but honestly I would chose Fellaini over Lukaku because he brings something no other player can at United.
Yesterday there was once instant where he tried to control the ball and it popped up and hit him on his nose or somewhere there and he looked surprised and confused as to what was happening. I did not know where to laugh or to cry.
Control is a physical attribute, not a mental one.
I am actually questioning his intelligence to be honest. A player with his physical attributes should not be bullied as much as he does if he learned to use them intelligently.
Fair to him for getting this far in his career I guess.
He also took his goal expertly, give the man credit when it is due.You must be joking or trying to be a WUM. Lukaku may be intelligent off the field and I do not know his IQ but on the field he is piss poor most of the time. As others have said he is always on his back foot and to be honest I am surprised that he got the goal against Newcastle as normally he would have either been offside or on the back foot. Of course he is a decent player otherwise he would not be playing for Belgium. The same as Fellaini but honestly I would chose Fellaini over Lukaku because he brings something no other player can at United.
Yesterday there was once instant where he tried to control the ball and it popped up and hit him on his nose or somewhere there and he looked surprised and confused as to what was happening. I did not know where to laugh or to cry.
Ibra makes much better runs, which probably results in him being in more situations to get those 'big chances'. And then think about the goals Ibra made for himself like the outside the box shot vs Bournemouth away or Swansea. Lukaku simply doesn't bring this to the table