spontaneus1
Hamster, damn!
Its a misleading stat, he gets hopeless balls hoofed at him and has no support to counter with. Means he loses possession when trying to hold off 2/3 defenders constantly.But.. but.. he's not getting the service?
Its a misleading stat, he gets hopeless balls hoofed at him and has no support to counter with. Means he loses possession when trying to hold off 2/3 defenders constantly.But.. but.. he's not getting the service?
The way Jose plays, Martial/Sanchez won't be the answer either. He likes himself a target man.
The way Jose plays, Martial/Sanchez won't be the answer either. He likes himself a target man.
Will he ever score in a big game?
Obviously Mourinho won't do it, but it's what we should do. If he wanted that, he should've bought a target man that can actually hold the ball up, compete physically with defenders and dominate them in the air. He bought Lukaku because he is big. But ignore his size. Would make no difference to us in terms of successful hoofing if we played Rashford, Martial or Sanchez there compared to Lukaku, that's how useless he is in the air with long balls. He's purely a poacher, and can be a good player for that, but that's not suited to our current side at all and not suited to the majority of big teams.
Both Sanchez and Martial hold the ball far better. Lukakus touch is too inconsistent and his passing is beyond unreliable.
He really shouldn't be in position where 2/3 defenders are all on him.Its a misleading stat, he gets hopeless balls hoofed at him and has no support to counter with. Means he loses possession when trying to hold off 2/3 defenders constantly.
Martial and Sanchez are very inconsistent too. Yes, they probably hold it better, but won't be able to contest for aerial balls like Rom does.
Serious question for anyone who thinks he is the right guy to use up top:
Do you think he will score in any of the remaining big games this season?
Big games include any game against the top 6 (0 goals in them so far, still to play against Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea at OT, City away), or champions league knockout games, or the semi's/finals for the FA Cup (we are home against Brighton in the quarters... hardly a tough game, or at least it shouldn't be).
Contest, and lose them every time or give them away? Not sure what difference it'd make. City play Aguero up top and have for years. Liverpool play Firmino up top. We used to use Tevez and Rooney up top. So many others have smaller/weaker players up top then what Sanchez and Martial are. Martial probably even has a pretty average frame as a striker, not like he's really small. Contesting for aerial balls has little to do with height. It's in timing of the jump, reading the play, knowing how to use your body... Lukaku is awful at those 3, certainly worse then Martial or Sanchez are at it despite being smaller then him.Martial and Sanchez are very inconsistent too. Yes, they probably hold it better, but won't be able to contest for aerial balls like Rom does.
Scholes and Rio criticising him for not holding the bad is weird the guy is feeding on scraps, as usual from us in a big game. Criticise him for the chance he blew but the rest of his game was fine and he worked his socks off.
I didn't get carried away with either. I simply preferred Morata to Lukaku.
Wouldn't be surprised if Morata scores 35-40 goals this year.
I'd actually be surprised if Lukaku doesn't get 35 goals and wouldn't at all be shocked if he reaches 40. Also expect Rashford to get 20.
Let's hope... Considering how we play in big games (and him in particular), I wouldn't hold my breathHe'll score against Chelsea.
You did. You were chucking around 40 goal predictions like they were nothing earlier in the season.
That's unrealistic expectations and that's the foundation of the backlash against Lukaku (and Morata). They have never been that good. People just lost sight of how good you need to be to get 40 goals.
Contest, and lose them every time or give them away? Not sure what difference it'd make. City play Aguero up top and have for years. Liverpool play Firmino up top. We used to use Tevez and Rooney up top. So many others have smaller/weaker players up top then what Sanchez and Martial are. Martial probably even has a pretty average frame as a striker, not like he's really small. Contesting for aerial balls has little to do with height. It's in timing of the jump, reading the play, knowing how to use your body... Lukaku is awful at those 3, certainly worse then Martial or Sanchez are at it despite being smaller then him.
I wouldn't be shocked if he reached 40 isn't a hard prediction he would get 40. 30s was always realistic and still is.
I really hope so. Chelsea is a big game but I'm backing him to do well. Oh and pls remove this ugly tag on my name. Safe.He nearly had one tonight. He will have more chances next game.
You'd be surprised if he got less than 35, is what you said. More goals than our all time top goalscorer scored in any season, and the 4th highest goalscoring season in United's history. In his first season.
And you're still convinced you didn't have unrealistic expectations.
Contest, and lose them every time or give them away? Not sure what difference it'd make. City play Aguero up top and have for years. Liverpool play Firmino up top. We used to use Tevez and Rooney up top. So many others have smaller/weaker players up top then what Sanchez and Martial are. Martial probably even has a pretty average frame as a striker, not like he's really small. Contesting for aerial balls has little to do with height. It's in timing of the jump, reading the play, knowing how to use your body... Lukaku is awful at those 3, certainly worse then Martial or Sanchez are at it despite being smaller then him.
Yeah, I thought he was alright too. I think his touch is a little too heavy in close and that he needs to win more aerial duels especially with his back to goal so we can at least retain possession and get a stranglehold of the game. Those are the two parts to his game I'm most frustrated with on a consistent basis.I have to be the only one to think Lukaku played well tonight, looking at this thread. Tactics did not help him in any way but at least I think he did his best impression of a "target-man" yet.
So what if he doesn't get 35 and maybe winds up with 30 ? Would you feel good about winning an argument on the internet ?
I didn't say 40.
I'd actually be surprised if Lukaku doesn't get 35 goals and wouldn't at all be shocked if he reaches 40. Also expect Rashford to get 20.
I don't think they'd do worse though, that's the thing, seeing as Lukaku does virtually nothing from the long balls because he isn't that type of player. It doesn't matter that he's big. He sucks in the air. We would do better with them if we just stuck Fellaini up top since he is actually good in the air and can use his body properly to bring the ball down on his chest. Lukaku can't do any of that and it's essentially like playing with a smaller guy up top because he can't do it.I'm not talking about what other teams have. Other managers have different tactics. It very much long ball by Jose and it's well documented that he likes a target man striker. I very much doubt Martial and Sanchez be doing any better if they were constantly getting long balls up to them.
You certainly seemed to think 40 was in his grasps when we signed him.
And again this is the point those numbers you predicted would put him somewhere between RVNs best and second best goal scoring seasons for United. Because of those sky high expectations on Lukaku in his first season (as well as the perception that Lukaku was an upgrade on Zlatan's woefully underappreciated sesson) he's getting nowhere near enough credit for what he's doing well.
I didn't argue how many goals Lukaku would score so I have no vested interest in the argument. I do find it amusing when someone blindly ignores the facts and pretends they didn't say something just to protect their credibility on an internet forum though.
It is, but as we know its also not his best assets. He could have been better at that stuff today, absolutely, as it was his main job. But still think he did goodYeah, I thought he was alright too. I think his touch is a little too heavy in close and that he needs to win more aerial duels especially with his back to goal so we can at least retain possession and get a stranglehold of the game. Those are the two parts to his game I'm most frustrated with on a consistent basis.
If he improves just one aspect of those two 20% we become such a better side. Give him half of Drogba's ability to win the ball with back to goal or Berba's touch and he'd be absolutely world class already.It is, but as we know its also not his best assets. He could have been better at that stuff today, absolutely, as it was his main job. But still think he did good
You obviously do have a vested interest since you are here to argue about it. We still have as many as 20 fixtures remaining so lets wait and see how things end up before gleefully scampering into this thread to triumphantly point out how not wrong you were.
Its a possibility but how these players are utilized also has a massive impact on their productivity. Lukaku has seemingly underachieved this year and yet is currently sitting on a paltry 21 goals. If he was in a system that utilized his physicality and pace that number could be significantly more at this point.
What do you honestly think is more likely?
That Lukaku is a striker who should be scoring close to the club's best ever goal scoring season in his first season at the club is being denied that opportunity by a manager that can't get the best out of him.
Or Lukaku is a very good, not world class player, whos performing about as decently as his record before we signed him suggested he might?
I think it's latter and I think thats true for a lot of our attackers that people are blaming Mourinho for not getting more out of. I accept that plenty don't agree, but that's football.
So I won't disagree here, but the thing is winning even very few is better than not winning at all going with Martial and Alexis who wouldn't challenge for aerially from goal kick, or long ball from the back.Lukaku is dross in the air for a man of his size. How often does the ball come back to us from the goal kick.
It's one thing being happy with his goal output for the season, and another being disappointed in him as a player and his performances on the pitch, especially in big games. Is it a good season if he scores 35 goals in a season, but none against the top 6 teams, none in the champions league knockout phase, none in the semi's or final of the FA Cup? It really isn't. He can score 40 goals against the bottom half sides but if he does that badly against anyone decent, then no amount of goals against shit teams will change that.If he was to score 40 goals this season, given the stage we're at, he would have exceeded expectations. We can say without any doubt that this would be the consensus if you ask our fans now. So we don't really need to wait any longer to establish that people who thought 40 was a realistic expectation had gotten carried away. That shouldn't really be a big deal. Why is it so difficult to admit you got carried away, on such a non-issue?
The reality is that only 2 players in history have scored 35 goals for us in a season. Lukaku is not in their class yet and, as you've said yourself today, he probably won't be. If he scores over 30 goals this season - something Hughes, Cantona, Solskjaer, Cole, Yorke, Sheringham, Berbatov, van Persie and Ibrahimovic never managed - we should be very satisfied. If our fans aren't satisfied with that then expectations were set too high in the beginning.
That's the whole point I guess. I was just reaffirming NinjaFletch's position - I really don't care.