Loublaze
ATLien
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2009
- Messages
- 16,593
RVP had an even worse injury record from what I remember.
Yea yea. Fair enough. The record stands that Falcao is much more deadly.
RVP had an even worse injury record from what I remember.
Van Persie at his best vs Falcao at his best is not even a contest. Yes he is probably more clinical but Van Persie in full flow is poetry in motion.
Theyre actually pretty much dead level (at their best) on any offensive stat you choose to compare them on. Goals scored, shots taken, shots on target are all within minor percentage points of each other. The only one where there is a slight difference is that Falcao is marginally more deadly for the number of chances he gets, although its still a small difference.
The only consideration is that one is 3 years older and the other is recovering from a huge injury. My opinion is that RVP is getting too old to ever regain top form whereas Falcao at least has a chance of regaining his, and we should side with him because of that.
Theyre actually pretty much dead level (at their best) on any offensive stat you choose to compare them on. Goals scored, shots taken, shots on target are all within minor percentage points of each other. The only one where there is a slight difference is that Falcao is marginally more deadly for the number of chances he gets, although its still a small difference.
The only consideration is that one is 3 years older and the other is recovering from a huge injury. My opinion is that RVP is getting too old to ever regain top form whereas Falcao at least has a chance of regaining his, and we should side with him because of that.
Both SAF and Rio said in their books that the team had to repeatedly be told to pass the ball to RVP and pick out his runs. We even had a special meeting just to say "pass it to Van Persie"! Can't help but think there's a bit of that going on here. He's of no use if we aren't picking out his runs and, like any striker, his overall play suffers when he's not scoring goals.
He's been consistently missing chances he'd score in his sleep when he was at his best. It can't be all down to poor service. He's a shadow of the player he once was. Surely you can see that?
He's been consistently missing chances he'd score in his sleep when he was at his best. It can't be all down to poor service. He's a shadow of the player he once was. Surely you can see that?
He's missed chances for us even at his best. That's nothing new. Was the same for Arsenal as well.
His all round play is still alevel above Falcao so he should get the nod.
Nonsense. He's much more likely to miss chances in the last year or so than he would have at his best.
Missing chances is only half the problem anyway. His all round play has deteriorated massively.
Not really nonsense if you paid attention. He missed plenty of sitters and 1v1's in his first season.
Bingo. Amazing that people can't see that. It's not as though Van Persie has only recently stopped playing at his very best. How long is it now? 18 months?
I would say it's been more like 12 months actually, he was still as good as his first season up until he got that 6 week injury around December in my opinion and it was more that the team had regressed and was playing terrible football under Moyes. He hasn't been as good since he came back from that injury but he's still had some games like Olympiakos, Chelsea this season and then a small run of games in December where he played well.
Will he ever get back to his best? Doubtful, but let's what happens in the next 6 months or so because I think he was in a race against time to be fit for the World Cup and didn't look fully fit earlier in the season. 8 in 20 isn't exactly terrible either, even if he again never becomes the player he once was he could still be a useful player for 15-20 goals a season for a few years yet.
People might think this is me just desperately defending him but I would love nothing more than both Falcao and van Persie to get back to their very best. It's a difficult one because Falcao is younger and at his peak is a phenomenal player but would cost us at least 35-40 million it looks like and I don't think he's shown enough to warrant that purchase yet. van Persie is older and in a possibly permanent decline but is already our player and has a strong relationship with van Gaal and his philosophy.
If the rest of the team we're playing amazing football, and he was rubbish I would agree, but fact is, the attacking unit is playing like garbage, how on earth do people expect him to be able to show his best form?
Yeah, 18 months is probably harsh. I'll go with 12. It's still long fecking time though!
Doesn't matter, he has been past it for 18 months, he was never as prolific as Falcao (while both played as #9's their whole career) and his goalscoring record for club and country was piss poor in 2013-2014, which was last season. Also he has been fit the whole season and he missed so many chances, he never used to miss easy chances while scoring difficult goals, that was never his trademark. Also, the team does create enough, games like Southampton away for example. He scored 2 yeah, but he needed 14 chances for that, and it wasn't like he was the best player on the pitch aside from the goals.
Are you serious...
Van Persie played his whole career at Feyenoord as a winger. He was a no.10 for Arsenal up until 09/10. He was also a winger for Holland until 2010. Factor in his injury issues and its no surprise that falcao has averaged more goals per season. However Van Persie at his best 2010- 2013 was not only just as prolific as the goal poacher specialist Falcao he was also 5 times the player.Seriously, who cares that its in the Portuguese league? 41 in 51 is a great record regardless of what league it was achieved in. RVP has only ever had two 30 plus seasons, and in the remaining others the best he managed was 22 in a season. On average he's barely been a 20 goals a season striker.
Van Persie played his whole career at Feyenoord as a winger. He was a no.10 for Arsenal up until 09/10. He was also a winger for Holland until 2010. Factor in his injury issues and its no surprise that falcao has averaged more goals per season. However Van Persie at his best 2010- 2013 was not only just as prolific as the goal poacher specialist Falcao he was also 5 times the player.
No one who truly loves the game of Football can tell me that Falcao was better. RvP paints master pieces on the football pitch at his best. Falcao just scores goals.
Its very frustrating, as it'll probably be him and Falcao upfront against Leicester, which doesn't work as they're basically the same striker.Had 3 touches of the ball in that sub appearance, one of them missing a sitter. Herrera, who got subbed on at the same time as him, albeit in midfield, had 38. It's ridiculous how he just lets games flow by without doing anything.
Sadly its time to say goodbye to RVP, (and thanks, but no thanks to Falcao) not sure who could come in as a true 'lead the line striker' but thats what we need at the moment, would Zlatan be worth a punt for a season while we develope a young striker ?
A young striker who's currently scoring for fun is lacazette for Lyon.Sadly its time to say goodbye to RVP, (and thanks, but no thanks to Falcao) not sure who could come in as a true 'lead the line striker' but thats what we need at the moment, would Zlatan be worth a punt for a season while we develope a young striker ?
A young striker who's currently scoring for fun is lacazette for Lyon.
Well he's back looking like Sam Fisher from Splinter Cell, it's like he's taking Giggs place as our grey templed oldster. He'll no doubt start on Saturday and I doubt it matters, our strikers all look much of a muchness right now so we might as well stick him in.