Phil Duck
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 1,016
It's a combination of multiple things, once the team gets going and we start actually playing attacking football RVP will eventually come good again.
It's a combination of multiple things, once the team gets going and we start actually playing attacking football RVP will eventually come good again.
It's a combination of multiple things, once the team gets going and we start actually playing attacking football RVP will eventually come good again.
Is it sudden though? he's been way below par since SAF retired basically.
Alan Smith, Telegraph, reckons RVPs legs have gone and it's looking increasingly so. It's almost as though he's lost his athleticism overnight.
Alan Smith, Telegraph, reckons RVPs legs have gone and it's looking increasingly so. It's almost as though he's lost his athleticism overnight.
I still think he was pretty much at his 12/13 level in the first few months of the Moyes season until he picked up his first injury. A great header in the Community Shield, 2 brilliant goals against Swansea and some other good efforts like the header vs. Arsenal. After he came back in January was when he form became mixed even though he was still scoring.
He is becoming a liability and I really think he is a fantastic player but right now its like we start games with 10 men.
Yeah, he wasn't anywhere near as bad last season as he is right now. I can't imagine him scoring a goal like the Swansea ones last year, right now. The dramatic dip in quality is quite shocking tbh.
“I think if I’d brought him off some people would say ‘What are you doing? You are 1-0 down and you’re taking off your top goalscorer.’It still really pisses me off that Moyes tried to rush him back to fitness from that groin injury last season around December.
He bangs them in for Holland and people still think there's something wrong with him... The truth is he's not getting clean service and there's no point in him dropping deep the past few games because there's nobody else high enough for him to actually do something with it. In the Arsenal game the few times we did actually manage to carry the ball out to him he fluffed up, but both of the times I remember was because of Di Maria's awkward runs across him.
Bangs them in for Holland? Not true at all. And if he does, its vs Latvia etc. Great vs Spain, good goal vs Australia, that's about it in the past half year for him.He bangs them in for Holland and people still think there's something wrong with him... The truth is he's not getting clean service and there's no point in him dropping deep the past few games because there's nobody else high enough for him to actually do something with it. In the Arsenal game the few times we did actually manage to carry the ball out to him he fluffed up, but both of the times I remember was because of Di Maria's awkward runs across him.
Dont take us too seriously, the majority also wants Blind to be dropped for Clasie.He's been shit for Holland since the first 2 games of the World Cup consistently except the last game where they hammered some minnow.
Many dutch fans wanted him dropped for Huntelaar or sm1 else too.
Dont take us too seriously, the majority also wants Blind to be dropped for Clasie.
This is how I felt during the Arsenal game.
At times I was wondering if he was on the pitch or perhaps getting medical help off the pitch.
On match of the day, they stated that he only had 14 touches (I think)...which is incredible.
Yeah, but Willems has picken up some serious form and they want him there, as he offers more pace, power. So Blind is shifted to midfield, and de Jong was/is not available.Doesn't Blind play LB or LWB ?
“I think if I’d brought him off some people would say ‘What are you doing? You are 1-0 down and you’re taking off your top goalscorer.’
Who cares? No, we wouldn't have won the title without him. None of those 3 players were a big loss.Sorry to say, but I think he's past it already. He's had one world class season, followed by a decent season(seeing as he was injured half the time), followed by his possible decline in the third. If he fails to recover, will he go down as a good or bad signing?
I think it boils down to this: do you think we would have won the 2013 season without RVP?
If the answer is "no", then he was a good signing after all. But if the answer is "yes", then I struggle to see how this was a good signing. He alienated Kagawa, Welbeck and Hernandez and forced us to try a weak partnership(Rooney + RVP). I think the team as a whole would have been much better off if we never signed RVP. But it remains to be seen. If he recovers, then I might have to eat those words.
No, we wouldn't have won the title without him.
None of those 3 players were a big loss.
31 is still young and virile.Didn't realize RvP was already 31. Yep, he's definitely done.
31 is still young and virile.
I disagree, and does many(most?) others. First of all, the league was way too shite and Fergie way too experienced, for us not to win that year. Secondly, players like Kagawa, Rooney, Welbeck and Hernadez would all most likely have stepped up a notch, making the team better overall.
That is sort of the point. RVP stagnated their progress. If we never signed him, these 3 would have been a big loss now, as they'd all likely have improved immensely. We basically sacrificed 3 promising players + team balance in order to fit in a star that most likely only lasted for a season. I don't think that's worth it.
Agreed. I think people forget that we had no problems scoring goals the season before he came. Welbeck and Rooney had potential, and the little bits of Kagawa and Rooney looked promising.
I definitely agree we could have won the league without him, and we could be better for it now, had we not signed him.
I look back at the signing as a unnecessary, and possibly a mistake.