Speak
Step up to my misogyny soapbox
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2013
- Messages
- 6,347
It's not that Falcao's 'better' necessarily. But his style of player is better suited for the way we should be playing. At least in my opinion.
van Persie has the best control and technique of the set of strikers we have - that's in no doubt, but it's the speed he plays at and the lack of movement. He doesn't release the ball quick enough, he can't stretch teams, which makes him less suited to the lone role. He holds up the ball accurately, but again it slows down the move. Something like what Lukaku did against Arsenal is pretty much out of the question for van Persie.
Falcao is capable of that sort of aggressive, positive hold up play, and he trumps van Persie in all the other areas above, and is one of the few strikers who is just as capable of scoring from nothing and scoring acrobatic goals as van Persie.
Other than set pieces and control (with isn't the be-all and end-all) I don't see why van Persie should start over him.
It would just lead to more disjointed, slow football.
And I don't see van persie as one to really partner anyone. He just doesn't play like a partner. He's not like Berkgamp, with out of this world vision and passing and intelligence in the final third. And he's not the player he was years ago when he played wide for Arsenal, so wide in a 4-3-3 is out of the question.
van Persie has the best control and technique of the set of strikers we have - that's in no doubt, but it's the speed he plays at and the lack of movement. He doesn't release the ball quick enough, he can't stretch teams, which makes him less suited to the lone role. He holds up the ball accurately, but again it slows down the move. Something like what Lukaku did against Arsenal is pretty much out of the question for van Persie.
Falcao is capable of that sort of aggressive, positive hold up play, and he trumps van Persie in all the other areas above, and is one of the few strikers who is just as capable of scoring from nothing and scoring acrobatic goals as van Persie.
Other than set pieces and control (with isn't the be-all and end-all) I don't see why van Persie should start over him.
It would just lead to more disjointed, slow football.
And I don't see van persie as one to really partner anyone. He just doesn't play like a partner. He's not like Berkgamp, with out of this world vision and passing and intelligence in the final third. And he's not the player he was years ago when he played wide for Arsenal, so wide in a 4-3-3 is out of the question.
Last edited: