Roberto De Zerbi

I was writing something similar but you've pretty much nailed it for me.

I don't know what people expect.
Remember they got roughly £150m for those players, perhaps spend some of it to replace them? You can't replace those two with Baleba, Dahoud and Milner and think you'll be fine. Everyone's had injuries this season to deal with, that isn't a good enough excuse. They won 5 games out of 6 at the start of the season and since then, they've won 6 games. Twice against Forest, Sheffield, Brentford, Spurs and Palace. He deserves ample criticism.
 
Remember they got roughly £150m for those players, perhaps spend some of it to replace them? You can't replace those two with Baleba, Dahoud and Milner and think you'll be fine. Everyone's had injuries this season to deal with, that isn't a good enough excuse. They won 5 games out of 6 at the start of the season and since then, they've won 6 games. Twice against Forest, Sheffield, Brentford, Spurs and Palace. He deserves ample criticism.
He doesn't make signings, he's just a head coach over there. They replaced Caicedo and Mac Allister with a 19 year old with barely a years experience at the top level. He had every right to be frustrated and to question the club's ambition.
Everyone's had injuries this season to deal with, that isn't a good enough excuse.
It is if your squad is already small and full of kids. Imagine our injury crisis this season + we sold Bruno without replacing him, and had no Garnacho breaking through. What position do you think we'd be in?
 
Would you say they have a better team, squad and manager than most, if not all the teams below them currently and Bournemouth who are currently above them? I probably would. I think if they finish below 10th it would be a season of slight underachievement, they have stabilised enough as a club in comparison to those below them that top half is a realistic aim.

Purely on squad quality I'd place them around 9th-11th best in the league. City, Arsenal, Liverpool, United, Chelsea, Tottenham, Newcastle, Aston Villa definitely have better squads than the current iteration of Brighton, and there is a case to be made for West Ham and Crystal Palace as well.

So if they finish anywhere between 9th-12th it would be pretty much what you'd expect from them.

Remember they got roughly £150m for those players, perhaps spend some of it to replace them? You can't replace those two with Baleba, Dahoud and Milner and think you'll be fine. Everyone's had injuries this season to deal with, that isn't a good enough excuse. They won 5 games out of 6 at the start of the season and since then, they've won 6 games. Twice against Forest, Sheffield, Brentford, Spurs and Palace. He deserves ample criticism.

Do you really think it was De Zerbi's decision to not spend the Caicedo & MacAllister money on quality replacements? The penny pinching was 100% a board decision.
 
Purely on squad quality I'd place them around 9th-11th best in the league. City, Arsenal, Liverpool, United, Chelsea, Tottenham, Newcastle, Aston Villa definitely have better squads than the current iteration of Brighton, and there is a case to be made for West Ham and Crystal Palace as well.

So if they finish anywhere between 9th-12th it would be pretty much what you'd expect from them.

Wouldn't say Palace do. Perhaps Palace in Olise and Eze have two players that are better than anything Brighton do but overall I'd say Brighton have the better squad.

Indeed. So if we are saying that is what you'd expect then you would look into other factors where they've been poor or underwhelmed. As @Lash points out they've won 5 in their first 6 games and since then have only won another 6 which is poor no matter who you are or what injuries you've had. If they pick up a few more wins in their final 5 games then it may be a better reflection of the season but if they don't then that's not good.
 
He doesn't make signings, he's just a head coach over there. They replaced Caicedo and Mac Allister with a 19 year old with barely a years experience at the top level. He had every right to be frustrated and to question the club's ambition.

It is if your squad is already small and full of kids. Imagine our injury crisis this season + we sold Bruno without replacing him, and had no Garnacho breaking through. What position do you think we'd be in?
Do you really think it was De Zerbi's decision to not spend the Caicedo & MacAllister money on quality replacements? The penny pinching was 100% a board decision.
Fine to put the blame on no reinforcing properly on the board, but on one hand I get told the coach was overperforming and the reason they were so good, then apparently it was really was down to the two players they sold?

They've progressively got worse when they've had injuries, just like us. The board invested poorly and they're suffering for it, just like us. They create less than us and concede more than us, despite this lad supposedly employing a vastly superior style of play. I am struggling to see where he's done well this year, for stuff we berate Ten Hag for.
 
Fine to put the blame on no reinforcing properly on the board, but on one hand I get told the coach was overperforming and the reason they were so good, then apparently it was really was down to the two players they sold?

They've progressively got worse when they've had injuries, just like us. The board invested poorly and they're suffering for it, just like us. They create less than us and concede more than us, despite this lad supposedly employing a vastly superior style of play. I am struggling to see where he's done well this year, for stuff we berate Ten Hag for.
The truth is that injuries have affected both clubs, and both of them have failed to adapt to the situation. De Zerbi shouldn't have went toe to toe with City with the squad that he had, but he seems to be treating the rest of the season like training rather than being pragmatic, going 5 back and grinding results. That doesn't seem to be in his M.O. I'm still curious to see what he can do with a bigger club, squad, and resources. But he's probably not the next Klopp.
 
Wouldn't say Palace do. Perhaps Palace in Olise and Eze have two players that are better than anything Brighton do but overall I'd say Brighton have the better squad.

Yeah, Palace I was on the fence about which is why I didn't put it among the definitives. Olise & Eze are obviously the key reasons why it's even a discussion but I'd also rate their main CB pairing Guehi & Andersen as better than any duo this season's Brighton could come up with. Doucoure could also definitely do a job in Brighton's midfield too and Wharton is a highly promising young midfielder over there. Maybe a fully fit Brighton would still edge the squad comparison against Palace but to me they're very close in level.

The truth is that injuries have affected both clubs, and both of them have failed to adapt to the situation. De Zerbi shouldn't have went toe to toe with City with the squad that he had, but he seems to be treating the rest of the season like training rather than being pragmatic, going 5 back and grinding results. That doesn't seem to be in his M.O. I'm still curious to see what he can do with a bigger club, squad, and resources. But he's probably not the next Klopp.

Yeah, the naivety is what makes me somewhat question De Zerbi.

He's definitely a good coach and a good tactician for the kind of football he's trying to instill, but a top manager still needs to have a plan B when things get tough and the fact he hasn't shown any willingness/ability to adapt to tough circumstances by making some tactical changes to a more pragmatic approach would be a bit of a red flag for me. So if a top side wants to hire him it's a big gamble. Either it will go really, really well if he can get his style working well enough to dominate most games and not even need a plan B, or it will go tits up very quickly and questions will be raised over some nasty beatings where the opposing manager just figures out what works against him.
 
Last edited:
The truth is that injuries have affected both clubs, and both of them have failed to adapt to the situation. De Zerbi shouldn't have went toe to toe with City with the squad that he had, but he seems to be treating the rest of the season like training rather than being pragmatic, going 5 back and grinding results. That doesn't seem to be in his M.O. I'm still curious to see what he can do with a bigger club, squad, and resources. But he's probably not the next Klopp.
The City game isn't the issue for me, it's the Burnley game and the others.

https://x.com/wearebrighton/status/1783776039673422219

Training isn't going well if this is the case. I definitely think he could do better at a bigger club, but he also has to take responsibility for the god awful form their in. We'll see if they pick up towards the end of the season, but they don't look like they're improving.
 
Complete fraud. Stay clear, no top club will touch him. If they do, they are desperate and fools.
 
Neither can de Zerbis at the moment!

Edit: you actually have to go back to Feb for a goal that wasn't an OG in the league :lol:
Welbeck scored against Liverpool last month, but that’s the only one. Still not that great.
 
Normal club: you seem to have an ability to instill a system into a team, even with average players. We think that in a club with better players, you have a good chance of thriving. Please sign

United: you're not a miracle worker. Why did you not improve on that 6th place finish, despite losing talent, and playing in Europe? We don't think you can work here at United.
:lol:
 
He rode on Potter's work and is now being exposed ?
 
I was against this guy when we were first linked with him back in Jan and he has done nothing since then to change that opinion. Very overrated on the Caf cause he plays sexy football apparently. Feel like all those links with Bayern and other clubs were his agents work.
 
Overrate a manager and then underrate him a few months later. The football fan special
 
Serial loser. No thanks, I hope we stay well clear.
 
The importance of a manager tends to be overblown.

If you are going to review your opinion on a manager/player every 90 minutes (pretty much what every so called journo/pundit does these days) then you are going to have a chaotic revolving door of opinions all season.

Look at a squad list and that will tell you whereabouts it will end in the table. Media will peddle narratives but come week 38 of the season Spurs will finish about where they always do and Brighton will do the same. Ange and DeZerbi are ok managers but I don't think either of them are special.
 
I always say it's easy to have an impact in a short period (1 season or so), but what makes a very good manager is being able to adapt successfully when others adapt to you, can you keep motivation for more than a short period and have the players keep going over time, can you build on what you've done well. So many managers come in and have a good short term impact, bring in some unique quality, but then can't keep going or aren't well rounded where they understand how to build on every aspect, on and off the ball. De Zerbi seems to be going down that path.
 
Do not go near him, they’ve been hammered far too many times this season. We’ve far too many of those under Ten Hag no matter how impressive his style of play is
In the words of DJ Khaled “Another One”
 
I feel like sub consciously you know when players and managers are shite. I actively wanted this guy and Memphis Depay at Liverpool
 
He was never special. Profited from Potters work at the start, now it is flattening out. Would get found out massively at a top club
 
He'd do a great job with better players. They play with ambition, it goes against you sometimes, but it's there.