Not sure about this. I think 4-2-3-1 fits the squad better, and I expect it to be the formation we start with next season.
Can't see us signing Sancho, Varane AND a new DM
Sadly agree. Feels like a bit of a Glazer-esque leak to get people excited.I don't really buy this. I think they'll try it against the little teams in pre-season but it won't stick when push comes to shove. We still have too many weak spots in the team.
Interesting, will take a couple things though:
1. An actual DM. Please not Rice.
2. Bruno to act like an actual CM and not a no.10. Think his individual play will lessen a little, but it will be at a strength of the team as a whole - we become far less reliant on him and a bit more balanced in midfield.
Just the small difference that we are comparing what 3 can do with what 4 can do. Mcfred is not one player! Individually they both lack key facets needed for a pure defensive midDoes Pogba, Bruno and McFred have a significant difference to say Kross, Modric & Casemiro. That Real Madrid three didn't have a true DM. Kroos and Pogba play similarly with Kroos having a bit more attention to detail (doesn't get caught on the ball so often). Casemiro is an energy player, box to box, putting in tackles. Not dissimilar to McFred. Then Modric who tends to get further upfield than Kroos but is maybe more a true CM than Bruno is.
I'd rather have James at CB. Or Sancho in goal.Wasn't there a rumour that Wan Bissaka would be given a chance at CDM? Maybe we see this in pre-season.
Not really true though, how many times do teams score 9 goals? It has happened to Southampton a couple of times, Wigan, Ipswich but I can't remember anyone else in the premiership era, so no the result is not irrelevant, nor does playing against ten men mean we will naturally create more chances.We're talking about different things then. I'm not claiming our finishing isn't good enough, I'm saying that as a team we don't score enough goals. And yes, that is because we don't create enough, because we find it difficult to break down teams who don't give us space. That's why the Southampton game is irrelevant: of course we're going to create more than enough chances when playing 90 minutes against ten men.
Again, the point is that 1) our attacking play needs serious improvement because it's not good enough for a title challenge, 2) it's not just an issue of personnel. So I'd be happy to see changes.
De Bruyne is a much better passer. Or I should say a much more consistent passer, really.I don't get this fear of hampering Bruno. Yes he probably won't be getting the same numbers, but its surely a good thing to have more goals being shared across the team and our front three in particular. There's also no reason why he can't continue to look to play the killer pass in a midfield 3 - De Bruyne plays as part of a 3 for City doesn't he?
*Varane intensifies*I think it really needs a fast partner for Maguire too so we can play a higher line
Wasn't there a rumour that Wan Bissaka would be given a chance at CDM? Maybe we see this in pre-season.
I'd rather have James at CB. Or Sancho in goal.
Interesting, will take a couple things though:
1. An actual DM. Please not Rice.
2. Bruno to act like an actual CM and not a no.10. Think his individual play will lessen a little, but it will be at a strength of the team as a whole - we become far less reliant on him and a bit more balanced in midfield.
I agree, in an ideal world but I think this story (if true) could still be a better option, on balance, than last seasons McFred.4-2-3-1 makes better use of Bruno, 4-3-3 will make better use of Pogba.
The question is: if we go for 4-3-3 with Pogba and Bruno as hybrid 8/10 how the hell we're going to balance this. we need a strong #6 to make it happend. Pogba of coruse could play as hybrid 6/8 but i don't trust him to be disciplined
I agree. The 433 should bring the best out of Pogba in the way the 4231 brings the best out of Bruno. But then as you say the latter then loses his best traits; It’s very musical chairs with our players.For me it is (as it always seems to be with our team), where do his best qualities lie? We always seem to be struggling to make an XI gel.
With this change, we’d be going from a system, as @Ali Dia has correctly pointed out repeatedly that doesn’t fit Pogba as the best role for him in the 4231 would be the 10 - to one which, to me, makes Bruno the odd one out. He obviously deserves a crack at stamping his role in the 3, but the switch immediately swings the suitability from Bruno to Pogba, in terms of who is in their optimised formation.
What are your views on this @Ali Dia ? I agreed with tour position before that ‘Sancho gives us what Pogba offers on the left and Bruno is the 10 so he doesn’t fit’, and would like to know your take should we switch to a midfield 3.
Another issue not discussed is the centre forward role for me. Moving to a traditional midfield 3 should in theory help us control a football match better, but it also creates a greater need for a striker who can out up 20+ goals, especially if Bruno’s attentions are to be focused elsewhere further back. We’d need Cavani, at 34/35 or Martial to really deliver numbers, especially as Rashford, our main goal threat from wide, will be out.
We played more this way after the lockdown last summer and he was very productive because he's a really high quality player so I would imagine he'll be fine. The bigger issue is that Matic had one of his short-lived good spells for the first few games back and once that dropped off it no longer worked because we haven't got a holding player who is good positionally and can pass the ball forwards (McTominay is probably the best option in that role but he's far from ideal) and by the end of that season and very quickly at the start of last season, when Ole tried it again, he resorted back to Fred and McTominay together.
Phil Jones at CDMShaw CDM, Telles LB
Can’t see this being great news for Bruno. Think asking him to be a CM makes it far easier to improve upon him in an elite team. In a role where he isn’t primarily expected to score and create loads, I doubt it would take too long before the question of whether more conventional ‘midfielders’ would be better suited. Like when Bellingham comes onto the market perhaps, or if we get Camavinga or Mejbri kicks on.
His current role extracts the optimum from him I believe.
I agree. The 433 should bring the best out of Pogba in the way the 4231 brings the best out of Bruno. But then as you say the latter It’s very musical chairs with our players.
On paper with what we currently have for players who actually fit the system of a 433, it would probably be van De Beek and Pogba in a 3 behind a DM (Matic?).
The centre forward point is fair - though I did renew my yearly subscription to Martial FC after much debate. I do think the general idea in a 433 is that whilst you lose the G/A of your no.10, the team in and of itself picks up more goals elsewhere. E.G. Pogba was 13 + 9 in Ole’s first season as a third CM/kind of no.10. The idea in my mind is we’re sacrificing Bruno being in the 99th percentile for goals, assists, and key passes etc. to make it so the entire midfield and wide players pick up a their average a bit more. Whether it works in practice…
Given Pogba’s injury issues, potentially.Bigger role for Van De Beek?
For me it is (as it always seems to be with our team), where do his best qualities lie? We always seem to be struggling to make an XI gel.
With this change, we’d be going from a system, as @Ali Dia has correctly pointed out repeatedly that doesn’t fit Pogba as the best role for him in the 4231 would be the 10 - to one which, to me, makes Bruno the odd one out. He obviously deserves a crack at stamping his role in the 3, but the switch immediately swings the suitability from Bruno to Pogba, in terms of who is in their optimised formation.
What are your views on this @Ali Dia ? I agreed with tour position before that ‘Sancho gives us what Pogba offers on the left and Bruno is the 10 so he doesn’t fit’, and would like to know your take should we switch to a midfield 3.
Another issue not discussed is the centre forward role for me. Moving to a traditional midfield 3 should in theory help us control a football match better, but it also creates a greater need for a striker who can out up 20+ goals, especially if Bruno’s attentions are to be focused elsewhere further back. We’d need Cavani, at 34/35 or Martial to really deliver numbers, especially as Rashford, our main goal threat from wide, will be out.
Bigger role for Van De Beek?
Hopefully yes. Donny is made for this system(because it's the classical Ajax/Dutch way).not sure if it's been mentioned yet but if this is true it's surely good news for Donny
Also worth nothing that we’ll likely play a 3 (Varane, Lindelöf, Maguire) or a double pivot in the big big games regardless.
Also Lingard and Pereira, potentially a GK too.If we sell Telles, VdB, Bailly/Tuanzeebe that could resale enough funds.
I'm not sure if I'm alone here but I definitely wouldn't have Beek in that role, he's not quick, he gets pushed off the ball and he can't tackle, he can pass though.Deano
Trippier - Varane - Maguire - Shaw
Beek
Bruno - Pogba
Greenwood - Cavani - Sancho
I don't think it would work too. If it's remaniscent of Juventus, VdB is no Pirlo and Bruno can't tackle like Marchisio. Nor vice versa.I'm not sure if I'm alone here but I definitely wouldn't have Beek in that role, he's not quick, he gets pushed off the ball and he can't tackle, he can pass though.
What? I’ve been hammered here for suggesting we can partner Pogba in a midfield two if we get a top DM in, now we are thinking of putting Beek there on his own?Deano
Trippier - Varane - Maguire - Shaw
Beek
Bruno - Pogba
Greenwood - Cavani - Sancho