Riyad Mahrez | Signed new contract at Leicester City

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mahrez was a key player for a very good Leicester side who won the title and he deserves a lot of praise for an excellent season. There shouldn't even be a comparison with Bale though.

What Bale did was extraordinary, he wasn't part of a good team, he was a team. Going forward under AVB we were utterly devoid of any penetration, so we created practically no chances for him. Bale nearly dragged us in to the top 4 with an awful team and an awful manager, scoring screamer after screamer every single week to win us matches. Our strategy was genuinely 'keep it tight at the back, wait for Bale to do something' for most of the season. No Modric, no creativity, boring possession football, yet he scored 21 league goals. Unreal.

We have some good players now, but nobody who will ever be even close to what Bale did for us. His late goals against West Ham and Sunderland....unbelievable, honestly breathtaking. He was scoring goals every single week that most attackers are lucky to score one of every season. It was surreal , as a fan you ended up expecting a screamer every time he was on the ball, not hoping but expecting. That season was probably the best example of a one man team I've seen. When he left I was terrified.

That's a funny way of looking at it. Mahrez won the title with a team tipped for relegation, but it's Bale who did the extraordinary thing by almost taking Spurs to fourth?
 
That's a funny way of looking at it. Mahrez won the title with a team tipped for relegation, but it's Bale who did the extraordinary thing by almost taking Spurs to fourth?

No need to panic. You've entered a Spurs logic zone. Just don't make eye contact and back away slowly. Bale was fantastic at the end of his Spurs time but Leicester just accomplished something unthinkable and the 2 players who clearly provided the most production vs. the average Prem player were Mahrez at RW and Kante at CM.

Vardy scored 25, which is probably 12-14-ish more goals than you'd expect from a typical 9, Drinkwater and Schmeichel were excellent and the CB partnership excellent but I think Mahrez and Kante had the highest VORP by a fair bit if such a thing were quantifiable in football.

More on topic, I actually think Mahrez could help Arsenal win the title. If they don't sign him, the RW position is their weakest in the front 6 by a fair distance. With him, they get the best RW in the Prem the last 2 years. It's a weak position compared to LW, but still.
 
Arsenal can be scarily good when they're on song. If they sign him they'll be even better. Still though, they need a CB and Striker.
 
Seems like a shitty time to make the transfer so close to the start of the season.
 
We should swap him for Rooney.

I'll let Woodward iron out any wrinkles in my master plan, if there are any.
 
I wonder how much Leicester see as a value Mahrez, in a climate where Sterling was £50m, KdB £55m and Stones is £47-50m.

Player of the year should be at least £60-£70m since Leicester have no need or will to sell him.
 
I wonder how much Leicester see as a value Mahrez, in a climate where Sterling was £50m, KdB £55m and Stones is £47-50m.

Player of the year should be at least £60-£70m since Leicester have no need or will to sell him.

You're forgetting two of those players are English and therefore are nearly double their actual worth
 
I wonder how much Leicester see as a value Mahrez, in a climate where Sterling was £50m, KdB £55m and Stones is £47-50m.

Player of the year should be at least £60-£70m since Leicester have no need or will to sell him.

You're also forgetting that all 3 of those signings were made by Man City - to whom money is no object. Believe it or not, the majority of the football world is still pretty reasonable in terms of player prices (Higuain being the obvious exception and it can probably be attributed to Juventus wanting to directly weaken their competition, attempt to take a step further to compete in Europe and knowing they are receiving a boatload for Paul Pogba anyway).

If City or United come in for the player, most clubs will concede to them.. because most can't afford the astronomical prices that United and City are willing to pay. But that does not mean that the market bends to the rules of these clubs totally.
 
You're forgetting two of those players are English and therefore are nearly double their actual worth
You're also forgetting that all 3 of those signings were made by Man City - to whom money is no object. Believe it or not, the majority of the football world is still pretty reasonable in terms of player prices (Higuain being the obvious exception and it can probably be attributed to Juventus wanting to directly weaken their competition, attempt to take a step further to compete in Europe and knowing they are receiving a boatload for Paul Pogba anyway).

If City or United come in for the player, most clubs will concede to them.. because most can't afford the astronomical prices that United and City are willing to pay. But that does not mean that the market bends to the rules of these clubs totally.


i know it's the English players and Man City argument but again you have Watford turning down £30m for Troy Deeney, Liverpool refusing to budge on Benteke for anything less than £32.5 and Palace bringing in £30m for Bolasie.

Either way you look at this Mehrez valuation should be no less than £55m-£65m. He's only 25 and won't be 26 till February 2017.
 
I cannot think of a better example of a one man team than Bale that season. Basically carried an average side and a shit manager with that magic left foot of his. Mahrez was in top form last season but still nowhere near Bale.


Carried them to 5th place where they always finish anyway. Actually that's a lie, they finished 4th the season before Bale famously carried them to glory.

Not to say Bale's individual season wasn't better than Mahrez. That's fair. The correct answer is clearly Suarez though. He might have actually carried Pool to the title if it weren't for that meddling Gerrard.
 
Last edited:
I cannot think of a better example of a one man team than Bale that season. Basically carried an average side and a shit manager with that magic left foot of his. Mahrez was in top form last season but still nowhere near Bale.

What an horrendous post. Bale "carrying" Tottenham to 5th place is somehow better than Mahrez carrying fecking Leicester to the League title. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

"Nowhere near" ffs.
 
We should be all over him too.

1. He is a top player
2. Would make our squad more formidable
3. Stop a rival getting him - if Jose can beat Wenger to a signing I'm sure he'd love that just for the shits and giggles
 
You're also forgetting that all 3 of those signings were made by Man City - to whom money is no object. Believe it or not, the majority of the football world is still pretty reasonable in terms of player prices (Higuain being the obvious exception and it can probably be attributed to Juventus wanting to directly weaken their competition, attempt to take a step further to compete in Europe and knowing they are receiving a boatload for Paul Pogba anyway).

If City or United come in for the player, most clubs will concede to them.. because most can't afford the astronomical prices that United and City are willing to pay. But that does not mean that the market bends to the rules of these clubs totally.

Smaller clubs are paying around 30 Million pounds for average players. Mahrez is worth way too much than that. If Arsenal gets him for below 40 Million then they should get all the praises they deserve.
 
I hope he stays for another season at Leicester - then we go for him next season. I'd love him here - he would have been my number 1 signing - but seeing that we signed Miki, and guessing Rooney will continue to play and start this season, I just can't see us going for him now.
 
He would be a great signing...but it means Miki being moved in to 10. Which means Rooney doesn't play. Which means this will never happen.
 
He would be a very good player for Arsenal and he will suits their tactic dynamic and technics very well.

I can see him combining so well with Bellerin and Ozil.

They'll be very dangerous to handle this season with him, Xhaka and maybe Mustafi
 
I wonder how much Leicester see as a value Mahrez, in a climate where Sterling was £50m, KdB £55m and Stones is £47-50m.

Player of the year should be at least £60-£70m since Leicester have no need or will to sell him.

Leicester shouldn't accept less then £50m in my opinion, and probably hold out for £60.

If Bolasie can go for £30m, then Mahrez should be way above that.
 
Not even near the last season Bale had in the premiership. What games are you watching?

i was watching Mahrez rip up City at the Etihad as he took Leicester City to the Premiership title, not a player help a team go up a few places in the league and only got player of the year coz Suarez decided to bite some one.
 
If LCFC sell for less than £60, they shouuld feel mugged.
 
Good player but no room for him in a squad that's already struggling to get players in. Also I'm not sure he can make the step up to a big club, very different pressure pulling on a Leicester shirt than Utd, Arsenal or Chelsea.
 
Mahrez was a key player for a very good Leicester side who won the title and he deserves a lot of praise for an excellent season. There shouldn't even be a comparison with Bale though.

What Bale did was extraordinary, he wasn't part of a good team, he was a team. Going forward under AVB we were utterly devoid of any penetration, so we created practically no chances for him. Bale nearly dragged us in to the top 4 with an awful team and an awful manager, scoring screamer after screamer every single week to win us matches. Our strategy was genuinely 'keep it tight at the back, wait for Bale to do something' for most of the season. No Modric, no creativity, boring possession football, yet he scored 21 league goals. Unreal.

Defoe, Van der Vaart, Dembele, Sigurdsson, Adebayor i think as well, some of the players in the spurs team that season, so to say no attacking talent is rubbish, Winning the title and being a key player is much more impressive,
 
Don't see it happening.

Mahrez or Ozil to United next summer to replace Rooney.
 
Don't see it happening.

Mahrez or Ozil to United next summer to replace Rooney.
It can happen. has only two years left and Mourinho is always waxing lyrical. He would be 29 though. I can't see us paying what Arsenal would want.
 
He'd significantly improve Arsenal. Although Arsenal still has holes in their defense and striker position.
 
I don't get the point of them buying Mahrez with no striker skilled enough to convert his passes. Mahrez had Vardy in front of him last season, not Giroud who went missing for 2 months or so.
 
What an horrendous post. Bale "carrying" Tottenham to 5th place is somehow better than Mahrez carrying fecking Leicester to the League title. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

"Nowhere near" ffs.

A horrendous post yet you have not a single clue on what the word "carrying" means? Mahrez did not carry Leicester, especially when you consider that they had (at least on form) the best striker and midfielder in the league. Mahrez was a key player in a good team. Not to mention the rest of the team constantly pushing out top class performances way above their levels like Morgan and Drinkwater. Tottenham that season had a pile of average dross around Bale
 
Status
Not open for further replies.