Fer
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2014
- Messages
- 2,790
Who would you prefer between Willian and Pulisic?
Who would you prefer between Willian and Pulisic?
I’d take him right now. He’s been fantastic for Palace, pretty much kept them up.I'm getting desperate, so I'm doing a 180. Get Zaha in.
He's looking really good in this league, he's at a great age (25), has matured a lot, we have 25% sell on fee so cheaper for us.
What are the scouts suppose to do mate? The manager wants those players. I really doubt he listens to them or anyone else.I can't believe there's this much talent in the world and our scouts or management can't think of anyone besides Willian, Bale and Perisic.
What the feck are the 100s of scouts paid for? May aswell scrap the whole scouting team if we can't find a right winger worth signing.
Not sure, but I'd like it to happen. Apparently we have a 25% sell on clause, so if Chelsea had to pay £70m for Zaha, United could essentially get him for £52.5m (£70m paying 25% back to ourselves).
Because surely we get a 25% discount on the deal. So, if Palace sell for £50m to another club and we get £12.5m, surely we can outright sign Zaha for £37.5m as Palace would still owe us the 25% of any selling fee.
Either way, we won't sign him imo.
Don't think Willian is going to cost 60 million pounds. Also if Chelsea buy Zaha and we buy Willian for say 50+add ons, we are getting the player Jose actually wants for about 35 mill
I'm getting desperate, so I'm doing a 180. Get Zaha in.
He's looking really good in this league, he's at a great age (25), has matured a lot, we have 25% sell on fee so cheaper for us.
feck off. We’ll take Hazard for him thoughBakayoko can play on the right. Straight swap for Martial?
NoBakayoko can play on the right. Straight swap for Martial?
Done deal.feck off. We’ll take Hazard for him though
Talking about experienced players. Who do you rate Perisic compared with Willian?Little evidence that players in the first team is improving or developing, bar Lingaard.
Buying Pulisic and hope that he will improve, not the best for him or us.
Buying an experienced player familiar with playing in an attacking system with no plan and able to make immediate impacts makes more sense (with the current manager).
Short term: Willian is the best option.
Long term: If we in the (near) future change management and appoint a manager that is able to improve/develope our players, then yes Pulisic could be a good investment.
Hey, it's you who buys our duds! (Veron, Falcao, etc). We only take classy Chelsea players. Sure, Mata hasn't been great here, but he was worth it for Juanfield aloneBakayoko can play on the right. Straight swap for Martial?
Didn’t we get Zaha for slightly less than £20m? So roughly 25% of £70m anyway.I'm seeing this 25% sell on clause mentioned a lot but have seen no sources on it. Where has this originated? A Palace mate of mine is convinced that our sell-on clause only recovers the fee we paid Palace for him initially. Really tough to see who has the facts right.
For all the hate he got in here, I'd kill to habe another Nani. Our right flank is just dead.
It sounds like he's about to sign for Wolves and i can't say i've seen much of him but he couldn't be worse than having to watch Mata on the right for another season:
Talking about experienced players. Who do you rate Perisic compared with Willian?
Almost same as Arsenal as I remember. Winter 2017 was when we supposedly begin talks... to end up with Alexis.Malcom made so much sense. Was Utd never in for him?
Little evidence that players in the first team is improving or developing, bar Lingaard.
Buying Pulisic and hope that he will improve, not the best for him or us.
Buying an experienced player familiar with playing in an attacking system with no plan and able to make immediate impacts makes more sense (with the current manager).
Short term: Willian is the best option.
Long term: If we in the (near) future change management and appoint a manager that is able to improve/develope our players, then yes Pulisic could be a good investment.
Didn’t we get Zaha for slightly less than £20m? So roughly 25% of £70m anyway.
Wouldn’t want to risk £50m+ on Zaha again anyway.
Willian is too short term for my liking, especially given the money he'll cost. Allegedly Chelsea want 70m, for a 30yo winger. We know how quickly those (wingers) can decline as soon as they lose a bit of stamina or pace. Ribery and Robben are the only wingers I know past 33 and they tend to miss half the season each. Pulisic is too long term for my liking, like you said won't suit us (or him) right now.
Hence I'm getting on the Zaha bandwagon.
Why are people saying Zaha?
He’s played through the middle or left for Palace last year.
His best position is a free role down the middle, which he won’t get with us.
Why not? Have you seen the state of us?
Yeah because Zaha is the solution to all our problems especially when he doesn’t play on the right wing anymore, so we signing more players who don’t play in the correct position that we need then fans moan that we need a right winger 3 months down the line.
Anyone but Mata please.