Denis' cuff
Full Member
Pereira?
With very little end product in that mix, and no flair, but then if Mourinho didn't want to invite pressure and play on the backfoot instead of playing for posession this wouldn't be an issue, but he relies too much on the counter because it's less risk and that is why we struggle against the smaller team who cede possession to us, and lets be real, the tracking back is about his obsession with grind and workate over flair and invention, just not a fit with how United play.It's not just about tracking back. It's being able to pick up the ball in deeper positions and initiating effective transitions. People keep bringing up wide players but none of them are better than Willian at this. Willian also knows what Mourinho wants in transitions.
Perisic, Fred, Pogba, Willian would have been very effective in transitions. Oh well.
Isn't he a bit average?
With very little end product in that mix, and no flair, but then if Mourinho didn't want to invite pressure and play on the backfoot instead of playing for posession this wouldn't be an issue, but he relies too much on the counter because it's less risk and that is why we struggle against the smaller team who cede possession to us, and lets be real, the tracking back is about his obsession with grind and workate over flair and invention, just not a fit with how United play.
The points we dropped last season were against the bottom half sides where we had to be creative with limited space and take charge of the game, you need more than a counter attack when you are a top side, and on top of that it's fine being good in transtion but the lack of end product is an issue, we need flair and invention added to this team, we rely way too much on Pogba for vision and adding two genric wingers isn't the answer, more craft is needed, we lack a player like De Bruyne, Eriksen, Silva, Coutinho, Isco etc....However if we just intend to play a basic style then coach Lingard and Rashford to be better counter attackers, they have the pace and ability to carry the ball, they just need some coaching and time to master it.Our home form was good last year so teams ceding possession to us really isn’t a problem. Like I said, its not just about tracking back, its picking up positions and being organised so we can transition more effectively.
No.Like Perisic?
The points we dropped last season were against the bottom half sides where we had to be creative with limited space and take charge of the game, you need more than a counter attack when you are a top side, and on top of that it's fine being good in transtion but the lack of end product is an issue, we need flair and invention added to this team, we rely way too much on Pogba for vision and adding two genric wingers isn't the answer, more craft is needed, we lack a player like De Bruyne, Eriksen, Silva, Coutinho, Isco etc....However if we just intend to play a basic style then coach Lingard and Rashford to be better counter attackers, they have the pace and ability to carry the ball, they just need some coaching and time to master it.
The RW conundrum... not sure when will this be sorted out. It does not take a genius to notice that all our attack has been from the left side or central midfield. The LBs who play against us are as good as smoking a cigar the enter the game since Valencia offers nothing going forward and ALL our right wingers cut inside.... and that includes Lingard as well. It's like someone's got some voodoo going on the RW and no one is supposed to hug the touchline and put in a proper cross for Lukaku to attack.
I'm not sure how proactive Jose is about getting the players he requires to succeed? But clearly if the list was provided and the players haven't been signed with 19 days to go, that would make me want to raise hell. For 3+ seasons, we've noticed that our left back situation has been pretty crappy. I'm not sure what wasn't that one of the biggest agenda items. LB should have been wrapped up before the World Cup so that we could focus on getting a CB, RW and another possible CM
We had a problem with both, Newcastle, Brighton and West Brom didn't beat us due to the press, they caught us with a goal and we failed to score due to our lack of creativity and attacking coaching in the final 3rd. We struggle when teams pack tight just as much as we do when teams press.Whenever teams sat back against us, it didn’t really work, that’s why our home form was so good...
When teams pressed us, we had a problem.
3-5-2 and Alex Sandro is the answer to this question.
We had a problem with both, Newcastle, Brighton and West Brom didn't beat us due to the press, they caught us with a goal and we failed to score due to our lack of creativity and attacking coaching in the final 3rd. We struggle when teams pack tight just as much as we do when teams press.
There's no such thing as a horrible formation, only bad execution of a formation. you don't need width in your front 3, lots of teams play 4-3-3 and don't get width from there, they get it from the fullbacks..It's really not, it's a horrible formation.
Chelsea got away with three at the back because they played a proper front three with Hazard and Willian providing width in addition to their fullbacks. We don't have that luxury.
It doesn't matter when or where the game took place, it was the same story, we had the bulk of possession and couldn't get through because we lack cohesion in attack due to the coaching and a lack of guile due to the personnel.Newcastle and Brighton was away and they did not just sit back. West Brom was the freak result at home when you look at the full season.
It doesn't matter when or where the game took place, it was the same story, we had the bulk of possession and couldn't get through because we lack cohesion in attack due to the coaching and a lack of guile due to the personnel.
I'm not scrambling, this is a messageboard about football, not a national debate, the fact is we lost 9 points to 3 shite teams because we couldn't break them down for the reasons I've stated and you just keep pretending it didn't happen and that we only struggle with teams that press. The other fact is our results vs the top 6 were good because they are all good possession teams who take the game on and allowed Mourinho to sit back and use the counter which he has openly admitted favouring because he wants to avoid taking risks. I know the results improved overall last season, I never said otherwise, but the football was cut your eyes out horrible, and I am sure if we allowed ourselves to become fully Mourinhoized then you'd be happy but it's not the answer IMO, becoming this grafting, counter machine with two dog soldier wingers and a team devoid of flair isn't the way to go against the changing tide in the game, and we'd still struggle with the teams that pack in just as we did last season because we'd still lack flair and invention in the final 3rd, be it tactically or due to the players we have.Brighton and Newcastle were not sitting back though, they pressed us. If you look at our home games where teams did sit back against us, we have improved a lot since Mourinho’s first season. That’s facts. You are scrambling.
I'm not scrambling, this is a messageboard about football, not a national debate, the fact is we lost 9 points to 3 shite teams because we couldn't break them down for the reasons I've stated and you just keep pretending it didn't happen and that we only struggle with teams that press. The other fact is our results vs the top 6 were good because they are all good possession teams who take the game on and allowed Mourinho to sit back and use the counter which he has openly admitted favouring because he wants to avoid taking risks. I know the results improved overall last season, I never said otherwise, but the football was cut your eyes out horrible, and I am sure if we allowed ourselves to become fully Mourinhoized then you'd be happy but it's not the answer IMO, becoming this grafting, counter machine with two dog soldier wingers and a team devoid of flair isn't the way to go against the changing tide in the game, and we'd still struggle with the teams that pack in just as we did last season because we'd still lack flair and invention in the final 3rd, be it tactically or due to the players we have.
No it isn't and I'll keep calling him that because it's what he is, I also wasn't negative when Mourinho first came here, but between his toxic thundercnut personality, throwing our young players under the bus and the garbage football he's served up your damn right I'm negative since last season and with very good reason, so if you want us to dive deeper into the Mourinho Rabbit hole and let him make a team in his image, that's cool, I and many other United fans don't want that, thus the divide in the fanbase we currently have.It’s about creating a team which is organised and can spring out with pace and precision. It is exciting in full flow. Stop calling players like Willian 'dog soldiers' as well. He DOES have flair, I dont know what player you have been watching. You are attaching your own negative thoughts to everything like it is reality. You did this before the start of last season as well.
When teams came to Old Trafford and sat back, we managed to break them down. The only one where we didn’t West Brom at the end of the season.
3-5-2 and Alex Sandro is the answer to this question.
No it isn't and I'll keep calling him that because it's what he is, I also wasn't negative when Mourinho first came here, but between his toxic thundercnut personality, throwing our young players under the bus and the garbage football he's served up your damn right I'm negative since last season and with very good reason, so if you want us to dive deeper into the Mourinho Rabbit hole and let him make a team in his image, that's cool, I and many other United fans don't want that, thus the divide in the fanbase we currently have.
You keep going on about the home record, breaking teams down away is equally important and it was where we slipped up due to the reasons I stated.
Nothing has worked well for us, look at last season, we had mixed results in all, but buying Sandro and letting our attackers play in the roles they favour is preferable to signing Willian and trying to use 4-3-3.If 352 is the answer. Was the question name a formation that doesn’t suit the current squad which the last two managers tried, didn’t work that well and then abandoned?
Yes they did, they were defensively set up, we had the bulk of possession, we failed to break them down, talk about scrambling, it's like you are being obtuse for the sake of it, I said we struggled with the press and packed in teams, yet for some reason you want to claim it's only one because you want to fit it to your narrative of building a counter attacking team.Teams we played away from home did not sit back, which is my point...
You seem a little mad, so I’ll just leave it here.
Nothing has worked well for us, look at last season, we had mixed results in all, but buying Sandro and letting our attackers play in the roles they favour is preferable to signing Willian and trying to use 4-3-3.
Would it be worth going for Dembele if Barca sign Willian? He's not popular with Barca fans at all.
The thing is none of them really want to play off the left, Sanchez best goal scoring season for Arsenal was central and he plays there for Chile as well, and Rashford is a striker. There is also very little in the way of options for the RW, Bale is the only one of the required quality but is an injury risk and also a pipedream. Getting a top LB should be a priority regardless of system, I just feel we'd get more out of the attackers we have in a wingback system that allowed them to operate as a central 3, and we need to get more out of them as there are no outstanding RW options that are available for us this summer.True but we looked particularly disjointed and unable to control games with 352, which is why i imagine Mourinho gave up on it.
Also we could sign Sandro and a right winger and still let all our attacking players play the roles they are effective in. Absolutely no reason Martial, Sanchez or Rashford can't all play well off the left in a 433. The only one who really loses out in a 433 is Lingard, but against the weaker sides at home we can switch to a 4231 to accommodate him centrally if we want to.
If Woodward is pulling for the business angle, I'm really surprised we don't hear more about Pulisic. He immediately makes United the team to follow for an entire generation of American youngsters.
And it's not like the kid isn't half decent either..
That's certainly the footballing side of it. So agreed, I doubt Jose has him on his list. As an American, I'd love to see him progress to the point of actually earning a spot with Europe's elite. Then again, Dortmund is a great team. Really I just don't want him at LiverpoolComing off the back of a very average season and not really pushing on. I don’t see United having much interest in him. He’s a. Set good talent, but very much a work in progress.
The thing is none of them really want to play off the left, Sanchez best goal scoring season for Arsenal was central and he plays there for Chile as well, and Rashford is a striker. There is also very little in the way of options for the RW, Bale is the only one of the required quality but is an injury risk and also a pipedream. Getting a top LB should be a priority regardless of system, I just feel we'd get more out of the attackers we have in a wingback system that allowed them to operate as a central 3, and we need to get more out of them as there are no outstanding RW options that are available for us this summer.
Sanchez has played well off the left over his career but has became the bigger goal threat central and that was where he was thriving for club and country when we bought him, as for Rashford, he lacks the skill to play wide IMO, he just runs into dead ends on the wing, where as his movement centrally is very good. Martial is the best of the bunch there but equally happy playing centrally, I think any of the 3 would improve playing off Lukaku in a partnership, which Lukaku also likes, rather than wide of him.Can't say i agree mate, i see Sanchez and Rashfords best position as left of a front 3. Martial has blew hot and cold there as well as up front, but he can at least play both positions. For me the equal priorities are RW and LB.
Switching to a 352 isn't going to help us when we don't have the wingbacks or central defenders for it. Valencia is no where near productive enough to be effective as a wingback and main creative force on the right, same with Young on the left. Our centre backs are all too injury prone to ever rely on three of them being fit at the same time, our best and most reliable CB Smalling isn't exactly suited to a system where the defenders are expected to bring the ball out of defence step into midfield and contribute to the attack.
I just don't see it happening, i don't think Mourinho likes the system at all. His whole defensive philosophy is built around a back 4 anyway.
If we don't sign a RW... Would you prefer to try a 352 formation or a 4312 (considering we have a lot of midfielders)?Sanchez has played well off the left over his career but has became the bigger goal threat central and that was where he was thriving for club and country when we bought him, as for Rashford, he lacks the skill to play wide IMO, he just runs into dead ends on the wing, where as his movement centrally is very good. Martial is the best of the bunch there but equally happy playing centrally, I think any of the 3 would improve playing off Lukaku in a partnership, which Lukaku also likes, rather than wide of him.
Valencia is unproductive in any formation, but we have bought Dalot to blood in there so we are looking forwards which I can't take issue with, Young is poor but that is why getting Alex Sandro is important. It comes down to who we can get for me, if we could get Mbappe or Bale or Asensio or Dembele or even Pulisic then sure, try 4-3-3, but the RW options are crap this summer, so I'd rather use a system that gets more from Lingard than bench him and drop £60M on someone like Willian or Rebic.
As for the CB's, Bailly, Rojo, Lindelof and the new one we are targetting are enough to bring the ball out, you can afford the central CB to be a pure stopper in the formation.
Depends on if we manage to bring in another CB this window, I think the 3-5-2 would be better as we lack a proper #10 for the diamond.If we don't sign a RW... Would you prefer to try a 352 formation or a 4312 (considering we have a lot of midfielders)?