You can have Obi Mikel for £15 million.
You can have Obi Mikel and £15 million.
fixed.
I like the look of Granit Xhaka, really excelled since moving to Germany, good work rate, short and long passing, wouldnt be too expensive either
Yeah he has really grown on me too this season. Excellent play and still fairly young, so he has still room to improve int he future.
Gündogan imo lacks Carricks defensive sense of positioning and I always felt he was more comfortable if he had the freedom to go forward.
If the main objective is to find an heir for Carrick I feel Xhaka is the one we should go for and not Gündogan, that's not to say we can't add him as well if he is available for a reasonable price.
The improvement in his game in the last 2 years is crazy, and can only get better, I know we never sign like for like replacements for anybody but this is as close as we are going to get this summer in Xhaka, cant see Monchegladbach fleecing us either
Blind is not the man for the job - the number's don't lie...
Note: The red blocks are the three games when we had Rooney + Fletcher/Fellaini and Herrera at the base.
The graph is just a simple way of illustrating the trend of points/results in each game with these players as the anchor in midfield. It shows quite clearly that the only time we've had any kind of consistency is when Carrick's been at the base of the midfield. Worth noting that Carrick started in the middle of a back three in that Liverpool game too, so you can extend his winning run by an extra game considering he was doing the same thing he always does - providing that cool, calm, calculated presence from a deep position.
Based on that I think it's fair to see we shouldn't be too concerned about what Carrick's influence on the pitch now and perhaps even into his late 30s, but it's becoming increasingly clear that age is catching up to him in the form of injuries. He's no longer the reliable ever-present he once was and we need a very able replacement in the short-term and a top class replacement in the long-term.
Blind has done fairly well this year on an individual level for his first season in a new country - he's shown his versatility and he's been pretty consistent - but ultimately you can't deny the correlation between the results/performances and his position at the base of our midfield. Part of it is because Carrick has played so well when he has been on the pitch this season, but the other part has been that Blind hasn't done well enough to earn his place as a regular starter in such a key position.
His passing is very safe and that's one of the biggest factors in our lack of penetration and laboured play. His pressing is very aggressive and often leaves us exposed on the counter-attack, and this is exacerbated by him being one of the slowest players in the team and being able to recover when he's been taken out of the game.
It's easy to say that after a terrible performance today from both himself and the team in which we lacked any pace in our penetration in possession and we were exposed on the counter, but both of these things have been a regularly theme this season. Except when Carrick has played. We need someone who can provide that defensive screen along with the penetrative passing that we so sorely lack on days like these, but along with that we really need someone who can be - as van Gaal says - a coach on the pitch.
It seems United are highly reliant on Carrick to provide his calmness and industry in midfield.
I'd be interested to find out win/loss/draw statistic when he's out of the team this season.
I agree and the thing with Van Gaal is that he really seems to rate German players so Geis is also definitely someone he could turn his attention to.I'll keep saying it but Johannes Geis at Mainz is the answer. His passing range from deep is superb and having started off as a CB knows how to defend. He's also not made from glass and captains Mainz now and then. Dortmund are after him to replace Gundogan with good reason. He's also young and would therefore accept being a deputy for Carrick for the first season. I can't stress just how good this fella is.
days like today are worthwhile if it underlines the fact that Blind or Rooney is like Phil Neville playing in midfield during an injury crisis
competent capable of decent performances but not a good option we should be using often....
I'm sure Van Gaal is on it.... I do think we need 2 midfielders to add to Herrera and Carrick
I'll keep saying it but Johannes Geis at Mainz is the answer. His passing range from deep is superb and having started off as a CB knows how to defend. He's also not made from glass and captains Mainz now and then. Dortmund are after him to replace Gundogan with good reason. He's also young and would therefore accept being a deputy for Carrick for the first season. I can't stress just how good this fella is.
ridiculous, there is not a big difference in Blind's or Carrick's positioning. Blind tends to be more advanced but it doesn't make him worse though. As soon as we're caught on counter Carrick can't do nothing about it. He's even slower than Blind. Carrick has a better distribution and is more of a physical presence, that's what we miss him for, not his defending, you could see Herrera playing in midfield and having much better defensive contribution than Carrick..The first goal starts with very poor positioning by Blind, though he deserves credit for chasing the counter down.
You have to believe on the second goal that Carrick would have been better positioned to pick up Stone.
On the third, all blame goes to the back line, yet at the same time one can see how Carrick would have been better positioned to make that perfect long ball a more difficult one to pull off.
But we're all saying the same thing: we need Carrick back as soon as possible and we need a partner/successor brought in this summer. I say Schneiderlin.
ridiculous, there is not a big difference in Blind's or Carrick's positioning. Blind tends to be more advanced but it doesn't make him worse though. As soon as we're caught on counter Carrick can't do nothing about it. He's even slower than Blind. Carrick has a better distribution and is more of a physical presence, that's what we miss him for, not his defending, you could see Herrera playing in midfield and having much better defensive contribution than Carrick..
would he picked stones? It was Valencia who was marking him so I doubt so. Had Januzaj been playing he would dribble passed three players and had two assists, it's as irrelevant..
The fact is that Blind wasn't completely fit and the whole team underperformed, we also had quite a bad luck, I am okay to start Blind next game, he showed he can play there couple of times.. I am also good with coming carrick back asap, he had a little better season than Blind but it wasn't long ago when people were whining about how Carrick should be dropped and we played Blind..
When talking actual topic, I certainly think we should get some number six but this time world class, somene who will kick both players' ass, both should be considered squad players next season, Carrick's 34 next season, picks up too many injuries and neither him is good enough defensively to play that role, we are getting exposed too much, we desperately need some hard man and that man you already mentioned it's Schneiderlin, had he(or similar type of player) been playing the game it might have been a different story. Had Carrick been playing nothing dramatic would have happened maybe our passing would be more crisp
It's not so much the passing range as being the critical part (though it is important), it's the lateral awareness in the space in front of the back four. Schneiderlin is excellent at marking that area of the pitch and is in general a pretty intelligent player. He doesn't have the passing range of Carrick but could absolutely do a job for us.
It's not so much the passing range as being the critical part (though it is important), it's the lateral awareness in the space in front of the back four. Schneiderlin is excellent at marking that area of the pitch and is in general a pretty intelligent player. He doesn't have the passing range of Carrick but could absolutely do a job for us.
Blind is not the man for the job - the number's don't lie...
Note: The red blocks are the three games when we had Rooney + Fletcher/Fellaini and Herrera at the base.
The graph is just a simple way of illustrating the trend of points/results in each game with these players as the anchor in midfield. It shows quite clearly that the only time we've had any kind of consistency is when Carrick's been at the base of the midfield. Worth noting that Carrick started in the middle of a back three in that Liverpool game too, so you can extend his winning run by an extra game considering he was doing the same thing he always does - providing that cool, calm, calculated presence from a deep position.
Based on that I think it's fair to see we shouldn't be too concerned about what Carrick's influence on the pitch now and perhaps even into his late 30s, but it's becoming increasingly clear that age is catching up to him in the form of injuries. He's no longer the reliable ever-present he once was and we need a very able replacement in the short-term and a top class replacement in the long-term.
Blind has done fairly well this year on an individual level for his first season in a new country - he's shown his versatility and he's been pretty consistent - but ultimately you can't deny the correlation between the results/performances and his position at the base of our midfield. Part of it is because Carrick has played so well when he has been on the pitch this season, but the other part has been that Blind hasn't done well enough to earn his place as a regular starter in such a key position.
His passing is very safe and that's one of the biggest factors in our lack of penetration and laboured play. His pressing is very aggressive and often leaves us exposed on the counter-attack, and this is exacerbated by him being one of the slowest players in the team and being able to recover when he's been taken out of the game.
It's easy to say that after a terrible performance today from both himself and the team in which we lacked any pace in our penetration in possession and we were exposed on the counter, but both of these things have been a regularly theme this season. Except when Carrick has played. We need someone who can provide that defensive screen along with the penetrative passing that we so sorely lack on days like these, but along with that we really need someone who can be - as van Gaal says - a coach on the pitch.
Mascherano is actually now pretty well rounded and matic is no makelele either. Carrick isn't some Scholes type playmaker. I don't think we need some genius passer to replace him.Other alternative would be having someone that absolutely superb in screening the back four, although offer very little in passing play: Mascherano, Makelele, Matic. To compensate for lack of creativity, they allow the team to have more attacking players in midfield. LvG has played van Bommel and Nigel de Jong, so he's not against using this type of "limited" player.
Mascherano is actually now pretty well rounded and matic is no makelele either. Carrick isn't some Scholes type playmaker. I don't think we need some genius passer to replace him.
Mascherano is actually now pretty well rounded and matic is no makelele either. Carrick isn't some Scholes type playmaker. I don't think we need some genius passer to replace him.
He's much better, yes. But mascherano and matic are not the same as makelele. Mascherano often builds from the back these days (did it at the World Cup and now for barca, nothing like his Liverpool days) as does matic. Every team doesn't have to have a player exactly like Carrick. It's gotten to the stage now where we've become far too reliant on Carrick and we need another anchor. But it doesn't have to be someone just like him. It can be a lesser passer. It can be a stronger, better tackler and more mobile player. The key is to get someone who can add as much in his own way.Carrick is an infinitely better passer of the pall than someone like Mascherano.
He's not even close to that lot in this aspect. Excellent player but you can't put both him and Scholes in the same bracket as passers.Carrick is a passing genius in my book. He's never been an attacking midfielder so he's never chalked up key passes or assists but there aren't many players in the last 10 years better than him passing from deep. Scholes, Pirlo, Alonso and Xavi.... Then Carrick.
Masch, Matic, and even Makelele are not bad passers, but we don't expect them to control the game or launch counter attack; which Carrick is capable of from his position.Mascherano is actually now pretty well rounded and matic is no makelele either. Carrick isn't some Scholes type playmaker. I don't think we need some genius passer to replace him.
He's not even close to that lot in this aspect. Excellent player but you can't put both him and Scholes in the same bracket as passers.
He's much better, yes. But mascherano and matic are not the same as makelele. Mascherano often builds from the back these days (did it at the World Cup and now for barca, nothing like his Liverpool days) as does matic. Every team doesn't have to have a player exactly like Carrick. It's gotten to the stage now where we've become far too reliant on Carrick and we need another anchor. But it doesn't have to be someone just like him. It can be a lesser passer. It can be a stronger, better tackler and more mobile player. The key is to get someone who can add as much in his own way.
Absolutely. And there's no better or worse. Carrick might be fine at playing the ball out from the back. But someone with more muscle has its own benefits. Matic has been key for Chelsea in this way.Masch, Matic, and even Makelele are not bad passers, but we don't expect them to control the game or launch counter attack; which Carrick is capable of from his position.
Agreed that Carrick isn't close to Scholes playmaking, and we don't need as genius as Scholes in that position. Schewi has less passing range than Carrick, but a much better DM. In the last WC, Schewi was more of "limited" DM by spraying safe passes, and let Kroos be the playmaker. So that's another route that we can take.
Calling them both genius passers is doing just that.That's why I didn't.
Why? There are plenty of other teams that use different combinations. I just gave the example of Dortmund. Chelsea are the same. Arsenal are the same. City have no deep lying playmaker either although they've been rubbish at this. Barca don't. Psg do I guess with verrati.We don't need a carbon copy but we definitely need someone who can screen the defence and also hurt the opposition with passing. Carrick's not the only example. Alonso's another. We already have the Mascherano, Makalele archetype in Blind. Hopefully his passing will improve but he's not good enough yet, as we can see from what's happened this season.
There really is a lack of players who can defend, pass and control games as well as he can right now IMO.
I struggle to think of anybody outside of maybe Kroos, possibly Busquets. Matic would have been ideal but he's not available, maybe Carvalho but I'm not that sure on him.
Who else is that type of player?
Serves you lot right for stealing him from us. Btw, thank you for doing soI'd still be tempted to be honest.
I only saw Xhaka a couple of times when we played Switzerland and a couple of times after that. Never really impressed me as he seemed more like a headless chicken. Has he improved a lot since that time?I like him but would prefer someone defensively strong also which Xhaka has, we need a tackler in the midfield also, we get creativity and strength in Xhaka I feel