- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 62,851
I'm not an atheist but even I can see the irony & illogic of a god whose sufferings match our own; if ever there were a man-made god, it's this one.
Doesn't he love us as well? (george carlin reference)
But you have to be very careful about what is allowed to be taken from the OT. And he allows humanity to suffer greatly, and not just because of evil humans.Well, according to the Bible, God offers everlasting life, and this world is a result of Satan's 'deviance' and Adam and Eve's misbehaviour, for want of a stronger word.
So, again, you can see why believers will think God's the good guy.
So do you believe all these decisions about the church were divinely inspired or something then? Rather than politically convenient?
But you have to be very careful about what is allowed to be taken from the OT. And he allows humanity to suffer greatly, and not just because of evil humans.
It's more difficult for your mum to think you don't believe in/love God.
Your mum's just expressing there that people have the ability to act according to their own will.
I can answer your question in another way. If God were to put a stop to evil actions, what do you think that would entail? By God's standards, we're all guilty many many times over for various sins, so the only thing God could do would be to judge and punish every single person accordingly right now. And it's kind of arbitrary, because you could say, why didn't you just judge everybody 100 years ago? or why didn't you just judge Hitler, and Stalin and so on.
From a Christian perspective, the fact you and I are alive right now, is because God has the grace not to pull the plug on creation.
The acts of violence you see in the world are the tip of the iceberg of human wickedness. Imagine what a murderer's heart looks like to God. In fact, God says we're all murderers, because we've all hated somebody with the fantasy or intention of harm towards them. In God's eyes, who is pure, that is murder of the heart.
God's standard of what constitutes evil is just much much purer than our own, but his mercy is also much greater than ours; it's greater than we can imagine. The fact God allows for these violent acts is the same reason he allows you and me to exist. Mercy. Suffering is an extension of the same grace that saw Christ suffer and die on the cross. In fact, suffering is God's wisdom. Suffering says that God loves the world so much he will endure it even though it grieves him so bitterly. But the Bible does clearly state that there is a day coming when God will judge man, and that day belongs to the Lord.
Why?
His mum told him he was talking nonsense as soon as he asked a perfectly valid question about how powerful God supposedly is.
.
I think you are Xtian. Protestant faith built upon existing doctrine as well as Biblical exegesis of careful edited textual options.No, I am just amused that you think I am a Roman Catholic.
Why?
His mum told him he was talking nonsense as soon as he asked a perfectly valid question about how powerful God supposedly is.
And according to some Christians no matter how much suffering and damage you've caused you can simply repent and you'll go to heaven. Whereas even though someone can be a good person and live their life well, not believing in something for which there is no evidence is enough for a ticket to hell for eternity.
How kind of him.
The standard that God of the Bible sets for what is sin in some cases is just ridiculous.
This part makes pretty much no sense to me.
Mutter Merkel said:The law is a schoolmaster to bring people to Christ. It acts as a mirror of a person's soul that would otherwise be hidden. When you realise how far you fall short of God's righteousness, then the correct response is both fear of God and awe toward Christ.
That would be sad. One should be ethical because you feel it is right, not because you fear to be punished... That's just being pragmatic.Great. That's just what we all need: yet another boss, lord or leader who uses intimidation and the prospect of punishment to gain a tawdry form of respect.
I wonder what non-existent part of him MM reckons will get into heaven?
Lol
Herman back?
Herman back?
Stephen Fry is one of the most celebrated ignoramuses in popular culture.
I'd have to be very stupid to believe a non-existent part of me will get into heaven, but possibly not as stupid as the person who framed the question.
You are stupid enough to believe that both God and the afterlife exist, and presumably that you have something like a non-physical soul, which is demonstrably not something that exists. You believe in many things that do not exist and have delusions about what will happen wrt them.Stephen Fry is one of the most celebrated ignoramuses in popular culture.
I'd have to be very stupid to believe a non-existent part of me will get into heaven, but possibly not as stupid as the person who framed the question.
At least the Bible redeemed some of that violence with the New Testament. Real or not, Jesus was a nice guy. Muhammad, on the other hand, is a massive douche.
And like hell is Islam a religion of peace, as others have said. ISIS is following it almost to the letter. There might be a few pleasantries and words of wisdom here and there, but the text is beset with violent urgings.
You are stupid enough to believe that both God and the afterlife exist, and presumably that you have something like a non-physical soul, which is demonstrably not something that exists. You believe in many things that do not exist and have delusions about what will happen wrt them.
All because you find those delusions more comfortable than reality I guess. One problem is that you deny that they are delusions.
Tell me then how billion of Muslims all around the world(not counting extremists obviously) are living under belief that (by anyones standard really - if you learn what every Muslim learns) Muhammad is the greatest human being ever and that Islam is religion of peace by actually living very peaceful life? How can you think that Muhammad isn't peaceful when people who actually believe in him have learned all their life that he was very peaceful?
Apparently everyone around sees somehow that Islam is violent yet Muslims live their whole life in thinking that is not, and that it is very peaceful religion but somehow that's not truth, because atheists have said so because they have read some things from Qur'an? How exactly is that possible? Does that mean that what real Muslims learn about Islam isn't right?
Tell me then how billion of Muslims all around the world(not counting extremists obviously) are living under belief that (by anyones standard really - if you learn what every Muslim learns) Muhammad is the greatest human being ever and that Islam is religion of peace by actually living very peaceful life? How can you think that Muhammad isn't peaceful when people who actually believe in him have learned all their life that he was very peaceful?
Apparently everyone around sees somehow that Islam is violent yet Muslims live their whole life in thinking that is not, and that it is very peaceful religion but somehow that's not truth, because atheists have said so because they have read some things from Qur'an? How exactly is that possible? Does that mean that what real Muslims learn about Islam isn't right?
I said nothing about consciousness.The Biblical concept of the soul is actually more closely linked to psychology. But hey, I am glad you can demonstrate human consciousness doesn't exist, buddy. What experiment, apart from knocking yourself out and falling head first onto the keyboard and producing the above and below statements, did you do to find that out?
And the award for circular reasoning goes to Feedingseagulls.
Its best to ignore people like that, there is no point debating/arguing with someone who has a closed mind. And if does think that ISIS is following islam to the letter
Thought of the Day: It's a funny way to show your humility by assuming intellectual superiority over others.
Show me your facts.Non-Muslim doesn't think Islam is the bestest thing eva... Shock!
My opinions are backed by fact, yours are based on abstract faith.
Woah, woah, woah. Steady on there. Where did I assume?
Non-Muslim doesn't think Islam is the bestest thing eva... Shock!
My opinions are backed by fact, yours are based on abstract faith.
Show me your facts.
You said your opinion is backed by facts. I'm waiting to see them.What, that Muhammad was a murderer, enslaver and rapist? I didn't even think the historicity of that was in doubt.
I love the idea that because he isn't Catholic, the texts upon which he based his faith did not undergo the vast bulk of the same editing, selection and motivation processes that other sects did.Probably in the replies implying that we're all twits and that you know everything.
I said nothing about consciousness.
Consciousness exists without the soul. But there is no Cartesian theatre in which experience is presented for decisions to be made. What you think of as consciousness though is likely to be the post-hoc narrative that is created by subconscious processes.
If as you seem to think, soul=consciousness, which is part of mind, and given that mind is the functioning of the brain, what gets to survive when your brain disintegrates?
Anyway, I'm going to step away from this thread, I can see it going wrong.
I just rail against the idea that ISIS are perverting true Islam, when they're actually upholding its original doctrine.
Anyway, I'm going to step away from this thread, I can see it going wrong.
I just rail against the idea that ISIS are perverting true Islam, when they're actually upholding its original doctrine.
My opinions are backed by fact, yours are based on abstract faith.
Show me your facts.
What, that Muhammad was a murderer, enslaver and rapist? I didn't even think the historicity of that was in doubt.
You said your opinion is backed by facts. I'm waiting to see them.
Anyway, I'm going to step away from this thread, I can see it going wrong.
I just rail against the idea that ISIS are perverting true Islam, when they're actually upholding its original doctrine.