- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,305
Did they review this incident?
Of course I am asking you to chase a dragon that doesn’t exist. We just disagree on the reason why that is! :-)
It will be interesting to see how handball decisions go for the rest of the season. The one today involved a player punching the ball, whilst looking straight at it and with no deflection or argument that it was hit too hard for him to react. If that’s no longer to be considered a deliberate handball, we won’t see many more this season.
Think of when a player loses the ballbut gets fouled and gets a pen. They would have never got a shot off but still pen. Most recent I can think of is Gundogan, miscontrols ball out of plat fouls other player first, gets a pen. What advantage was taken for that interpretation?
The old handball law was written that all handballs must be deliberate. However, referees always interpreted it with a degree of common sense where they factored in intent and the advantage gained. Where the advantage gained was so significant from a non-deliberate handball they typically awarded a penalty. Or, to put it another way, not all handballs given as penalties were deliberate. That was how referees embraced the spirit of the law.
Did they review this incident?
Did they review this incident?
Not sure how anyone can watch that and think Mount is the one who did something wrong!
Not sure how anyone can watch that and think Mount is the one who did something wrong!
And he connected, even if just briefly. Can imagine a different player than Fred rolling around in agony from that and drawing more attention to itIt's not a contest, is it?
They both clearly did something wrong.
And he connected, even if just briefly. Can imagine a different player than Fred rolling around in agony from that and drawing more attention to it
Fernandinho would've taken full advantage of that kickout by little Mounty.
Did they review this incident?
It’s the kind of stuff I thought VAR may have been introduced to pick up on, the sneaky kick outs missed by the ref, clearly not.As a bare minimum, Mount should've had a yellow.
Can't really much from Attwell though, he's an absolute useless referee.
Mount kicked him after the foul, Fred got yellow for the foul, Mount was lucky he didn't get anything for that.
there wouldn’t because people could accept mistakes made in real time, that handball was hard to see and I thought it was mason who handled it in real time. With replays and freeze frames and still making an iffy decision, that leaves a different sour taste feeling.it is laughable how much people over-react to VAR. although its no different to how much people over reacted to refereeing decisions pre VAR.
there would have been just as much angst about the handball in pre VAR times as there is now.
What was Fred's reaction? There was not one at all because he didn't kick him.
He kicked out a bit after getting smashed but didn't connect.
I know you lot are in full conspiracy mode but there was nothing in this other than Fred being a lucky boy to only get a yellow.
What was Fred's reaction? There was not one at all because he didn't kick him.
He kicked out a bit after getting smashed but didn't connect.
I know you lot are in full conspiracy mode but there was nothing in this other than Fred being a lucky boy to only get a yellow.
Did they review this incident?
What was Fred's reaction? There was not one at all because he didn't kick him.
He kicked out a bit after getting smashed but didn't connect.
I know you lot are in full conspiracy mode but there was nothing in this other than Fred being a lucky boy to only get a yellow.
He did connectWhat was Fred's reaction? There was not one at all because he didn't kick him.
He kicked out a bit after getting smashed but didn't connect.
I know you lot are in full conspiracy mode but there was nothing in this other than Fred being a lucky boy to only get a yellow.
He did connect
What was Fred's reaction? There was not one at all because he didn't kick him.
He kicked out a bit after getting smashed but didn't connect.
I know you lot are in full conspiracy mode but there was nothing in this other than Fred being a lucky boy to only get a yellow.
it is laughable how much people over-react to VAR. although its no different to how much people over reacted to refereeing decisions pre VAR.
there would have been just as much angst about the handball in pre VAR times as there is now.
It’s the kind of stuff I thought VAR may have been introduced to pick up on, the sneaky kick outs missed by the ref, clearly not.
come on there's nothing in that
I don't think there would have - because in real time very few people spotted the handball. So I think there would have been a much greater level of sympathy with the ref.
I was one of the very few
I spotted the hand ball in real time and was wondering why ref didn't give penalty.
It was a wimpy meaningless kick yes but it did connect Only Fred was too busy worrying what the ref was going to do, if he was ‘cleverer’ he would have flopped back down and rolled around. I don’t like players doing that but they do and it works, especially these days with VAR and the doubt that surrounds everything.Fred didn't seem to notice, if he did connect. I'm not talking about rolling around, there was literally zero reaction.
Then you have eagle eyes my friend - I like Tyler and Neville thought Mason handballed it!
Probably a good case study though, would you have been equally frustrated by the decision if the ref hadn't been able to watch it clear as day on a screen?.
What was Fred's reaction? There was not one at all because he didn't kick him.
He kicked out a bit after getting smashed but didn't connect.
I know you lot are in full conspiracy mode but there was nothing in this other than Fred being a lucky boy to only get a yellow.
Did they review this incident?
He barely touches him. If he made more meaningful contact they definitely would have reviewed it.There is nothing in that because Fred didn't roll on the ground. It was clear yellow card offense, but Chelsea players escaped so many yellows kicking James all game, so wasn't surprising Mount didn't get one.
They didn’t review Maguire’s kick out last season either, can’t complain really.
They didn’t review Maguire’s kick out last season either, can’t complain really.
That’s the main issue with VAR and how it’s being used imo. The over scrutiny of everything (accept clear kick outs that may only be yellows) is just too much.That's the problem isn't it, previously there was a good deal of sympathy on refs as it all happens in a split second and they are humans too without much help. Now they have all the assistance, replays, multiple angles and still make poor decisions.
They did review that, just didn't think it was a red for Maguire.
But yeah this Mount thing is a much a muchness... Its a yellow card at most, who cares?
In a match where Chelsea were pretty much allowed to do whatever they wanted to break up our attacks, i care.
It used to be a way to sell it to the audience at the begininng but now it's pointless, even more so in England where they did everything in their power to feck it up...The ref in the van telling the ref on the pitch to look at it again is such bullshit really. Just tell him he missed it and that he should give the pen.
"Maybe you wanna check that again" is such a cop out, puts pressure on the pitch ref and slows everything down.