Edgar Allan Pillow
Ero-Sennin
I haven't voted yet.
If I recall, you predicted Cutch to win, right?
AldoJinx strikes again. Beware Tito
I haven't voted yet.
If I recall, you predicted Cutch to win, right?
AldoJinx strikes again. Beware Tito
If I remember correctly the reason Laudrup was benched at this match is because he was bound to leave at the end of that season and had a dispute with Cruyff so the latter punished him by not playing him in the finals, don't think it was over confidence or complacency.No idea whether I'll wake up before this finishes so leaving a temp vote for Tito here.
I have the opposite problem to Viva, I love all of Cutch's players bar the midfield two. Switch those two for something more tasty and risky and you don't necessarily have a better team but one that will win or lose but always entertain. With this one I can't help but feel it is relying too much on counters while not having the personnel at the back to keep Tito from scoring one or two goals.
That 1994 CL Final comes to mind. Barca had won 15 games on the trot and were shitting on anyone they met, while Milan had lost their Dutchmen, struggled to score and had stumbled across the finishing line in Serie A (I think they hadn't won a game for a month or two). Capello had alienated all the classy players, and Savicevic in particular. Milan were fecked with injuries and suspensions and were forced to field a side which really should have been blown out of the water.
But no, they got overconfident, Cruyff even took pictures with the trophy before the game, he also benched Laudrup who he probably considered surplus to requirements with Baresi and Costacurta out. Yet the Italians, i.e. the second string ones, defended the way we all know they can defend and completely tore apart Barcelona. 60% of that tearing was Savicevic, hands down the MotM. I have a feeling the same could happen here, the more fancied frontline being contained while the less fancy one turns out an effective display. The players are certainly capable of it.
On the other hand, I think about Lucho arriving at the far post...
No one at that level in this game for me.Still busy making babies? Who's the lucky one in this game
Higher than Scholes'?Part of me would like to see Mendieta in the middle there with Mauro Silva, albeit I can understand the rationale for closing out the space TITO's front five will gravitate towards. Still he's probably got the highest peak of any central midfielder on the park and it seems a waste not to involve him.
If I recall, you predicted Cutch to win, right?
AldoJinx strikes again. Beware Tito
I just think it's bound to hit TITO on the break more often than TITO's open plays will. I'm not even talking about Cutch's open play action because I don't think he'll get much joy against TITO's midfield in open play.
But because Cutch won't have much on the ball in open play so Cutch won't stretch his defense as much as TITO will.Aren't you forgetting Tito's counters? With Totti adding muscle to create and Suarez arrowing into the box, that front line is a lot more flexible and difficul to track and so are much more lethal than Cutch's! Esp with Alves commited forward in attack.
You took the lead, now wait for another vote. It probably ends like that: 14-12, 5 minutes to go, Anto comes on, and changes his vote with that new unvote function and all of a sudden the game finishes 13-13 .
Part of me would like to see Mendieta in the middle there with Mauro Silva, albeit I can understand the rationale for closing out the space TITO's front five will gravitate towards. Still he's probably got the highest peak of any central midfielder on the park and it seems a waste not to involve him.
13-13
I'd argue that only misclicks are a good reason to change a vote. If you're not sure who to vote for and believe that subs/tactical changes could have an impact, then wait a while longer. Changing vote sucks, because the scoreline could have had an impact on the decision that lead to the tactical changes, it's like taking early goals away in the end to change the outcome of the game.You shouldn't be changing votes unless some big change has happened in the game. This is why I didn't bring up the presence of the unvote function, was worried it would be misused.
Exactly.I'd argue that only misclicks are a good reason to change a vote. If you're not sure who to vote for and believe that subs/tactical changes could have an impact, then wait a while longer. Changing vote sucks, because the scoreline could have had an impact on the decision that lead to the tactical changes.
All of a sudden, everyone could feel like he needs to change close wins into draws or something like that, when that's clearly not the idea behind the voting.
If I remember correctly the reason Laudrup was benched at this match is because he was bound to leave at the end of that season and had a dispute with Cruyff so the latter punished him by not playing him in the finals, don't think it was over confidence or complacency.
I can see TITO's players(especially Scholes, Deco, Cafu, Pessoto) getting really frustrated about Cutch's deep and extremely tough to crack defensive line
You shouldn't be changing votes unless some big change has happened in the game. This is why I didn't bring up the presence of the unvote function, was worried it would be misused.
I'd argue that only misclicks are a good reason to change a vote. If you're not sure who to vote for and believe that subs/tactical changes could have an impact, then wait a while longer. Changing vote sucks, because the scoreline could have had an impact on the decision that lead to the tactical changes, it's like taking early goals away in the end to change the outcome of the game.
All of a sudden, everyone could feel like he needs to change close wins into draws or something like that, when that's clearly not the idea behind the voting.
"The player in the Premiership I admire most? Easy – Scholes"
"He is the master"
"I'm more of an admirer of Paul Scholes than I am of Ronaldo. Scholes is one of the most complete footballers I've ever seen. His one-touch play is phenomenal. Whenever I have played against him I never felt I could get close to him.
"Scholes was probably the best English midfielder since Bobby Charlton.
He was such a brilliant long passer that he could choose a hair on the head of any team-mate answering the call of nature at our training ground. Gary Neville once thought he had found refuge in a bush, but Scholesy found him from 40 yeards. He inflicted a similar long-range missile strike, once, on Peter Schmeichel, and was chased round the training ground for his impertinence. Scholesy would have made a first class-sniper."
“Good enough to play for Brazil. I love to watch Scholes, to see him pass, the boy with the red hair and the red shirt.”
"Paul Scholes would have been one of my first choices for putting together a great team – that goes to show how highly I have always rated him. An all-round midfielder who possesses quality and character in abundance."
"I’m not the best, Paul Scholes is."
"My toughest opponent? Scholes of Manchester. He is the complete midfielder. Scholes is undoubtedly the greatest midfielder of his generation."
"United always had many amazing players, but whenever we faced them we were always, always, always scared of what Paul Scholes could do. Ask anyone from that old Arsenal team, they will tell you the same. If you let him play, he can kill you, and for me he was so underrated. The way he plays: one touch, arriving late into the box, the way he strikes the ball, his vision, his passing. Incredible."
“At La Masia (Barcelona’s Academy) his name was mentioned a lot. He’s a teacher.”
“Out of everyone at Manchester United, I would pick out Scholes – he is the best midfielder of his generation. I would have loved to have played alongside him.”
I knew that would get a bite. Frankly yes, a 1998-2001 Mendieta was in a group of two or three of the best proper midfielders in Europe at the time. Obviously Keane, Davids, Vieira and Veron were in about there at different stages as well. Scholes of course shits on him for longevity, and is the best midfielder England have produced in a long time, however I'm not sure at what point in his career you could justifiably say he was the best in Europe. Which is what Mendieta was for much of his Valencia spell.Higher than Scholes'?
Anyway that might be a case of placing better players but not playing an actual tactic.. One of the things I love about Cutch's team, actually I love it about both teams, is that unlike some teams in these drafts who just place a bunch of good players in the formation sheet they actually built teams that I can imagine how they'll play and it makes sense.. I'd like to believe my team was like that too.
I might change my vote if Mandieta were to be placed instead of either DMs.
I knew that would get a bite. Frankly yes, a 1998-2001 Mendieta was in a group of two or three of the best proper midfielders in Europe at the time. Obviously Keane, Davids, Vieira and Veron were in about there at different stages as well. Scholes of course shits on him for longevity, and is the best midfielder England have produced in a long time, however I'm not sure at what point in his career you could justifiably say he was the best in Europe. Which is what Mendieta was for much of his Valencia spell.
I'm not convinced Deco dominated in the same influential fashion as Mendieta at Valencia.Scholes was there or thereabouts in the same way Mendieta was for much of his career. It's hard to pick a best season but when he returned from injury in 2007 he was simply phenomenal.
I don't think Mendieta had a higher peak than Deco either.
I knew that would get a bite. Frankly yes, a 1998-2001 Mendieta was in a group of two or three of the best proper midfielders in Europe at the time. Obviously Keane, Davids, Vieira and Veron were in about there at different stages as well. Scholes of course shits on him for longevity, and is the best midfielder England have produced in a long time, however I'm not sure at what point in his career you could justifiably say he was the best in Europe. Which is what Mendieta was for much of his Valencia spell.
I'm not convinced Deco dominated in the same influential fashion as Mendieta at Valencia.
I voted Cutch in the end. It was extremely close as both teams are brilliantly set up and the individual match-ups are even all over the pitch.
What made me vote for Cutch was that I look at his team and instantly know he packs a punch - and the average performance from his offense will be enough to reach his level.
In team TITO I feel that it is a lot more intricate, with brilliant passers and interchanging front men who want great link-up etc etc. I think that the chance of them not clicking perfectly, is quite high and if they don't then TITO would lose.
So on that extremely fine margin I would say that Cutch would be more likely to win, even if it is so close it could go either way.
Anto that would hurt more than this did:
EDIT: After Anto's post I don't feel harsh, I feel sane.
I'm not convinced Deco dominated in the same influential fashion as Mendieta at Valencia.
I'm sure Gio is waiting for the last minute to vote as usual.
anto is a loose cannon here.