RAWK Goes Into Meltdown 2015-16 Edition

I hadn't seen the scarf flicking till now either.

Fear they are right about Ibrahimovic, Johnno must be beside himself, 600k a week, Johnno he's 36, la'

(waits to copy/paste slightly edited Johnno post into Ibra thread as own work)
 
ChaddyP said:
yes, because it's a Liverpool forum.
Click to expand...

that-suspicious-meme.jpg
 
shaky said:
4hySgQo.gif

I only just noticed the guy in the black jacket getting pickpocketed by the shifty bloke behind him!
Click to expand...
Every time I see this gif i spot something else, The really angry ginger bloke that loks like David Fairclough, the odd looking bloke that appears from nowhere, the old fella next to the bloke in the green that has apparently shot his load, the odd racist bloke, the lad with his phone who looks happy just to be there...it's just incredible.
 
It's been done, but I did like Rawk goes into meltdown 2016-17 Klopp of the flops.
 
and for when he gets sacked in two seasons time - booked it packed it klopps off.
 
I might have to throw Zlatan's book in the bin now.
Click to expand...

Was a great player but too feckin late to come over here. He will not cope with the fact that every feckin yard dog will be kicking the shyte out of him every week - traditional cold, wet Tue night at Stoke anyone? Will no doubt bag the odd worldly because the class is still there but overall, meh.
Click to expand...

Anyone thinking it's a good signing isn't seeing the full picture.

Sure, he might end up being decent enough for them (I personally think he'll only add to their attacking woes, him being a target man, and they love pumping a long ball, or crossing it) but here's the thing: he'll be on 600k a week. That sets a very bad precedent for them in the future as far as wanting to sign marquee players goes. They'll all want a piece of that pie. I mean, Rooney is on 300k now, and look at the state of him. It smacks of a desperation signing. If one of their fringe players, or youngsters, ends up looking better than Zlatan, then what's stopping them from pulling a "Sterling"? Paying a player that's 35 years old 600k a week is sheer and utter madness.
Click to expand...

Typical Mourinho signing. Short term outlook to get a title in his first year or two then doesn't give a shit after that.
Click to expand...
 
But here's the thing, 600k a week.

I can't comprehend the lunacy.
 
It's amazing how their opinions of Sadio Mane have changed from last season when we were interested in him to now when they want him.
 
600k\week :lol:

The weekly fee here will just continue to grow, won't it?

Zlatan scores 10 goals - "Yeah, but they are foochen paying him 500k\week to do it, least they should expect. Shit rags"
Zlatan scores 20 goals - "Typical mercinary, for foochen 750\k week I hope it is worth it, la'"
Zlatan scores 30 goals - "Foochen ridiculous club, needs to pay a 39 year old star 1,1m\week so he'll play for them"
 
He wouldnt and wont play every week if he signs, in fact he will very much be in rotation.
As for 600k a week LOL.
He couldnt command that when he was in his prime, we certainly wouldnt be paying him even a 3rd of it now.
 
Ducklegs said:
He couldnt command that when he was in his prime, we certainly wouldnt be paying him even a 3rd of it now.
Click to expand...

You can bet your balls that Ibrahimovic won't sign a 200k-a-week-or-less contract. He could rake in a million a week right now in China.
 
Piratesoup said:
You can bet your balls that Ibrahimovic won't sign a 200k-a-week-or-less contract. He could rake in a million a week right now in China.
Click to expand...

He wont be on absurd money, simply because the club wouldnt pay it.
600k a week is 2.4 million a month which is 30 million a year or there abouts in wages alone.
You can discount any reports of absurd wages as it will be bullshit.
 
Ducklegs said:
He wouldnt and wont play every week if he signs, in fact he will very much be in rotation.
As for 600k a week LOL.
He couldnt command that when he was in his prime, we certainly wouldnt be paying him even a 3rd of it now.
Click to expand...
Stop defending yourself against RAWK. This thread is for mockery
 
amolbhatia50k said:
It's wonderful how the guy on the left covering his eyes doesn't realize what a tit he looks like :lol:
Click to expand...
You do realise that he's not actually covering his eyes but making an incredibly obscene racist gesture as the player who just scored is of Asian heritage?

He's a tit because he's a racist bigot.
 
crossy1686 said:
You do realise that he's not actually covering his eyes but making an incredibly obscene racist gesture as the player who just scored is of Asian heritage?

He's a tit because he's a racist bigot.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure he was having a go at the linesman and that's from the Chelsea game last year, because he didn't give Liverpool a last minute pen.
 
DJ Jeff said:
Pretty sure he was having a go at the linesman and that's from the Chelsea game last year, because he didn't give Liverpool a last minute pen.
Click to expand...
Ah you're probably right. I think I was thinking of the 'monkey' gesture that someone was seen doing. Was that when we played them?
 
SwansonsTache said:
600k\week :lol:

The weekly fee here will just continue to grow, won't it?

Zlatan scores 10 goals - "Yeah, but they are foochen paying him 500k\week to do it, least they should expect. Shit rags"
Zlatan scores 20 goals - "Typical mercinary, for foochen 750\k week I hope it is worth it, la'"
Zlatan scores 30 goals - "Foochen ridiculous club, needs to pay a 39 year old star 1,1m\week so he'll play for them"
Click to expand...

:lol:

Not untrue.
 
crossy1686 said:
You do realise that he's not actually covering his eyes but making an incredibly obscene racist gesture as the player who just scored is of Asian heritage?

He's a tit because he's a racist bigot.
Click to expand...
That's what I thought but I wasn't sure given it doesn't show the player. So he both looks and is one.
 
I've heard Jonnowhite was a Malmö fan back in 1940s when Zlatan was a 41-yr old over-the-hill flat-track bully in the French league. He's disgusted by this signing, would've preferred Le Tallec who will become better than Messi.
 
This cracks me up. League Cup only one less point than FA Cup. :lol: UEFA Cup worth more than the FA Cup. :lol: Use of half points in scoring. Bizarre.

A true scoring rubric would be something like (i.e. ranked on "importance" which I do admit is subjective)
10 points League Titles
8 points European Cup/Champions League
6 points FA Cup
4 points UEFA Cup/Europa League, Cup Winners Cup
2 points League Cup
1 point for UEFA Super Cup, FIFA CWC, FIFA Intercontinental Cup (but no Charity/Community Shield, which United still lead considerably).
Because in all reality, at least outside the minds of Liverpool fanatics, the League Cup is lowly valued and is ludicrous to credit only one point difference between the that and the FA Cup. The EC/CL is not the top club goal and therefore cannot hold the same point value as winning the league. No doubt LFC fanatics would value the EC/CL lower if they trailed in total cups won; flip applies to Shields if LFC had the advantage - it would suddenly be a proud trophy to score, err claim. It's a bizarre scoring rubric fabricated to give Liverpool another moral victory/supremacy talking point.

I wonder how many points this clown would have awarded Liverpool for winning a recognized club world title? United have two, one of which was won during a "ratified tournament" which this table presents as necessary to receive credit.

Quick math based on my (perceived) fair rubric (D1/PL, EC/CL, FAC, UC/EL/CWC, LC, Other)...
Liverpool: 180, 40, 42, 12, 16, 3 = 293; take off the Other, 290
United: 200, 24, 72, 4, 8, 3 = 311; take off the Other, 308

We can change the LC points to 3 or 4 points if desired. Or not. Le sigh.

But let's play this clown's game, sort of... Leagues/ECs 10 points but reduce Other Europe to 5 points (it's worth half EC/CL at best). And the FAC/LC discrepancy must be altered, let's go 6 vs 3, it's worth half FAC at best. Other cups won should be counted but I digress.
Revised total (D1/PL, EC/CL, FAC, UC/EL/CWC, LC, Other)...
Liverpool: 180, 50, 42, 15, 24 = 311
United: 200, 30, 72, 5, 12 = 319

Oh feck it, I'll give 6 points to Other Europe and 4 to League Cups, for a 10, 10, 6, 6, 4 rubric... 322 vs 324

Only scouse devised formulas work in their favor.

13323667_881394871986106_2805508076044225538_o.png
 
MrMarcello said:
This cracks me up. League Cup only one less point than FA Cup. :lol: UEFA Cup worth more than the FA Cup. :lol: Use of half points in scoring. Bizarre.

A true scoring rubric would be something like (i.e. ranked on "importance" which I do admit is subjective)
10 points League Titles
8 points European Cup/Champions League
6 points FA Cup
4 points UEFA Cup/Europa League, Cup Winners Cup
2 points League Cup
1 point for UEFA Super Cup, FIFA CWC, FIFA Intercontinental Cup (but no Charity/Community Shield, which United still lead considerably).
Because in all reality, at least outside the minds of Liverpool fanatics, the League Cup is lowly valued and is ludicrous to credit only one point difference between the that and the FA Cup. The EC/CL is not the top club goal and therefore cannot hold the same point value as winning the league. No doubt LFC fanatics would value the EC/CL lower if they trailed in total cups won; flip applies to Shields if LFC had the advantage - it would suddenly be a proud trophy to score, err claim. It's a bizarre scoring rubric fabricated to give Liverpool another moral victory/supremacy talking point.

I wonder how many points this clown would have awarded Liverpool for winning a recognized club world title? United have two, one of which was won during a "ratified tournament" which this table presents as necessary to receive credit.

Quick math based on my (perceived) fair rubric (D1/PL, EC/CL, FAC, UC/EL/CWC, LC, Other)...
Liverpool: 180, 40, 42, 12, 16, 3 = 293; take off the Other, 290
United: 200, 24, 72, 4, 8, 3 = 311; take off the Other, 308

We can change the LC points to 3 or 4 points if desired. Or not. Le sigh.

But let's play this clown's game, sort of... Leagues/ECs 10 points but reduce Other Europe to 5 points (it's worth half EC/CL at best). And the FAC/LC discrepancy must be altered, let's go 6 vs 3, it's worth half FAC at best. Other cups won should be counted but I digress.
Revised total (D1/PL, EC/CL, FAC, UC/EL/CWC, LC, Other)...
Liverpool: 180, 50, 42, 15, 24 = 311
United: 200, 30, 72, 5, 12 = 319

Oh feck it, I'll give 6 points to Other Europe and 4 to League Cups, for a 10, 10, 6, 6, 4 rubric... 322 vs 324

Only scouse devised formulas work in their favor.

13323667_881394871986106_2805508076044225538_o.png
Click to expand...

I can't believe you gave this so much thought / energy :boring:
 
Last edited:
top1whoisman said:
I've heard Jonnowhite was a Malmö fan back in 1940s when Zlatan was a 41-yr old over-the-hill flat-track bully in the French league. He's disgusted by this signing, would've preferred Le Tallec who will become better than Messi.
Click to expand...
:lol:

Busby wouldn't have let him through the door etc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.