- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 62,851
How apt. A scouse sponge.
Tut Tut. This has me all shook up. I'm off to tell my mummy.
Terrible! I mean, if you're gonna do it, do it right...Right?Bloody hell, twenty squids for a George Michael statue!:
http://store.liverpoolfc.com/lfc-klopp-bobblehead/
At least it's not the men's room edition.Bloody hell, twenty squids for a George Michael statue!:
http://store.liverpoolfc.com/lfc-klopp-bobblehead/
Even more dodgy official merch!:
They. have. awful. taste.
It takes a very special type of Wanker to wear one of those and feel happy about it.
They're sold to photographers in The States as a means of keeping your gear protected from wet weather whilst being able to hold and operate camera and lens. I actually saw someone suggest their use to UK photographers on a Facebook photography page. It did not go down well.To be honest, growing up in India, I used to wear one of these as a kid a d absolutely loved it. It was the 'handsfree' version of am umbrella and as a kid, that was priceless. But I could see what you're saying as I've never seen an adult wear one of these before...
Shouldn't the B be a T?
damn it man, I'm singing it now.Terrible! I mean, if you're gonna do it, do it right...Right?
No thanks!Ladies! Now you can have Klopp spread all over your,er...um...bosoms.
Bloody hell, twenty squids for a George Michael statue!:
http://store.liverpoolfc.com/lfc-klopp-bobblehead/
damn it man, I'm singing it now.
I loathe to defend him, but he could just be near-sighted.In an article I accidentally scrolled through while looking for something else I managed to notice that Jurgen took his specs off so he could actually read his 50th birthday cards. Leading me to ponder that must cultivate looking like a beardy Deirdre Barlow as a deliberate choice of image / ludicrous affectation.
You should see the state of his brother though.
200m will not be a problem for us financially no matter what happens in the season. We have had exceptional revenue growth while keep wages relatively controlled. Our financial position is very strong.
That's correct. Even before you factor in...
- the 2016-17 TV Revenue (£148.1m);
- the likely additional CL revenue (~£50m);
- the added revenue from the Main stand; and
- the negative net spend last summer (£-15m)...
... there should still be plenty of room to make these signings simply judging by likely sales and wage savings alone:
Bogdan free £15k
Wisdom £4m £10k
Sakho £30m £75k
Moreno £15m £40k
Flanagan £1m £25k
Lucas £4m £80k
Stewart £10m £20k
Markovic £15m £45k
Ings £20m £60k (or Sturridge)
£89m £370k
Salah £34.3m £90k
Solanke £5m (?) £20k
Keita £55m £80k
Van Dijk £60m £110k
£154m £300k
Net: £65m spent, and £70k wages lower
These are obviously estimations and the P/L accounts are much more complex than this due to amortization, but in a nutshell these moves would entail a net spent of around £65m while keeping wages roughly at the same level, which is easily doable.
Needless to say, with some simple back-of-a-napkin maths it's easy to see why the club doesn't seem fazed by the rumoured fees for Keita and Van Dijk. The money is most certainly there to get the top transfer targets.
They need the Alternative Premier League table so that it can be their year in an alternate reality.There's a picture accompanies this but I couldn't be bothered, tbh. #APLT
FfsThe netspend couch accountants are hard at it again.
It must have been last season's towel.How big was that fecking napkin?
Why is the cock in his hand invisible?
Apparently it was Van Dijk's and they had to remove all traces of the tapping up.
van Dijk's Dick?
You hit the nail right on its headApparently it was Van Dijk's and they had to remove all traces of the tapping up.
A scoungeHow apt. A scouse sponge.
Haha. What a melt of a club.