No. You've been absolutely focussed on showing me how my notion that Lukaku had been marginalized was wrong, right up until I gave context to the stats you eagerly shared with me me. Your proceeding post then had absolutely nothing go do with what we had been discussing the last 5 hours. So, instead of actually addressing the points you were wrong on, you've moved the conversation full circle. Who's moving the goal posts exactly? You did the same exact same thing when you accused me of saying it had been a great window, despite me previously giving it a 6. You're throwing shit and seeing what sticks.
Lukaku played a lot of games under Ole. Like it or not he was not used only in handful of games, which I've already brought stats for. Lukaku also, as any player, can have dips in form or can be given a rest, just like any player. At the end of the day he played more than 3000 minutes for United last year, 45 games - most under Ole.
Martial finished just 4 games the full 90 minutes under Ole. He was often on the bench and other attacking players (including Lukaku) have been preferred over him. Was he marginalized as well? Lukaku's role at the club was first team striker and more often than not he was starter, can you dispute that?
We've replaced Lukaku with Greenwood. You might not like that but thats what has happened. As I've already demonstrated, and you have so far you've left completely unaddressed because it didn't suit your 'narrative'; when all our players were fit Lukaku wasn't getting many minutes anyway. Greenwood will take those minutes. It was only because we had 4 players pick up injuries within the space of a few weeks, all of whom missed at least 6 games, that Lukaku was getting regular game time at all.
How do you replace someone who has played 45 games last year with someone who has played 3 games in his career and is a teenager at a club fighting for top 4? Did Messi, Ronaldo and one of the very best players over the last decade(and even history) play 45 games in their opening seasons at a top club? Let's be serious for a second, do you honestly expect Greenwood to play in 45 games next season?
And yes players get injured, so don't give me that. Sanchez will also get knocks, Rashford will, Martial will, so I guess Greenwood has to always fill in then?
Come on, the bolded part is just lazy. Martial and Rashford are seen as Ole's preferred central strikers, but if our wide forwards pick up an injury then either of the aforementioned players can step in to replace them. Ole wants a fluid front line anyway, which is one of the reasons he's so eager to move on Lukaku. A static, central striker is the last thing he wants.
Then you replace him with a fluid, pressing striker, you had the whole Summer to identify a target and do just that. The point is we didn't bring a forward who can play 45 games and take Lukaku's position in the team. You know when you fail to do that it doesn't really make it a great Summer or average one. A striker/forward position is fairly important.
Do I think we need to sign another attacking player? Absolutely, but you're trying to make out we've got less options than we did last season, when in fact we have more. Greenwood is taking Lukaku's minutes and we've brought James in.
Again you expect some lads that didn't kick a football at top level to play 40-50 games next season? Are we in a worse state in attack than last year? Absolutely. Sanches is an year older, injury prone and to use your term - marginalized by Ole. Mata is an year older on the wrong side of 30 and declining every year.
Looking forward to seeing Greenwood playing 3000 minutes next year.
Which brings us back to my original point. We haven't addressed every position that needs addressing and we very light in some areas, but we've managed to fill two vital positions with quality and kept our two most influential players, who looked likely to leave at the beginning of the window. We've also made room for some of the very exciting talent we've developed. So it's not been a brilliant window by any stretch of the imagination, but it hasn't been woeful either. The 2s, 3s and 4s in this thread is typical cafe.
[/QUOTE]
We managed to keep two of the most influential players, one of which is unhappy and his head seemingly turned. 'Making room' isn't what top clubs are actually doing. If the young ones are good enough they will break through. We don't need to get rid of all the senior players just to make it easy for them.
It has been woeful by far when you consider that we couldn't shift any of the deadwood. You know something that we said we will do in the beginning through the management. Unless you consider Herrera and Lukaku as deadwood of course...
We are short in two positions in midfield. Matic another year older, Mctominay played 22 games last year so if he takes some of Matic's you are still 2 positions short. Attack is worse, of course you would argue otherwise with Greenwood playing 3000 minutes next year.
We have brought in RB to replace Young - well duh he's 34. Reinforced CB where we have another 6 CB's - naturally won't argue that's good, and then?
- no shifting deadwood
- no RW
- no CF
- no DM
- no AM
and you would argue with 3's and 4's?