Rasmus Højlund | Signed for United

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds very expensive and certainly not worth it right now. Koopmeiners is currently a better attacking player for Atalanta and he wouldnt be nearly worth that either. However, Hojlund is 20 and I do think that in a couple of years we could see him become a 20 goal striker for us. And with 20 goals + his pace and bit of skill on the ball then you could make the argument he's worth it. Thats the potential we're paying for
 
:lol:

‘STOP BEING MISERABLE!!!1!!’

‘I’m not miserable, I just have a different opinion to you’

‘AAARRGGGHHH NO YOU DON’T!!!11!!’

‘I think I do, also you don’t seem very happy yourself’

‘I AM feckING HAPPY - STOP COMPLAINING’

‘But you’re complaining too’

‘I’M ALLOWED TO COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU. YOURE NOT ALLOWED TO COMPLAIN ABOUT FOOTBALL!!11!’

‘Ok… sorry?’

‘ARRRGGGHH!!1! YOU ENTITLED PRICK! DO AS I WANT YOU TO!! DONT SAY THINGS I DONT LIKE!!’

Shades of DADDY DADDY WANT WANT WANT with this post.
 
Other than the clips, not seen him play, so no idea what to expect. However but, know other than Kane and Osimhen, not really any that would take us up levels immediately. So if paid this much, then have to believe that the view is this season will be one that helps a little fill the gaping hole we have in the #9 position but, ultimately there is a consensus that he will develop into a top player and will serve the club for years to come.

Very glad we got it done with 2 weeks still before the season starts, gives him at least a little bit of a pre-season with the squad and get accustomed to style of play. I suspect that he will be eased in much like Casemiro was, with Martial / Rashford taking the CF slot and him coming off the bench and will depend on him staking a claim to become a starter.

Now if we can maybe get some of the outgoings done, we can look at getting Amrabat in. Clearly not everyone is happy with the signing but, would be a fantastic window from the managers point of view.
Basically where I'm at.
 
Why do people keep bringing up Kane as if there was any chance of getting him. It was never going to happen. This isn't FM or FIFA
 
I’d much rather spunk this money on an exciting young prospect than on Toney, call me crazy. Toney is good but for money it would take, I don’t think he’s that special?
 
I’d much rather spunk this money on an exciting young prospect than on Toney, call me crazy. Toney is good but for money it would take, I don’t think he’s that special?
Depends on what you expect for 75m. He would guarantee you 15-20 PL goals for the next three four years. Special is subjective but for the money we are paying, we're expecting Hojlund to be even better, hpefully before he hits 25.
 
I don't get the complaints about the fee. Have you people not seen what the market's like lately?

Plus you can't just look at the transfer fee alone; he's reportedly being given a low salary, so the total package really isn't that expensive.
 
I love fans who make up phantom figures and random opinions without ever watching the player :lol:
£72m including add ons, and I guarantee I've watched him more than you. Carry on with your dog turd posts though.
 
Depends on what you expect for 75m. He would guarantee you 15-20 PL goals for the next three four years. Special is subjective but for the money we are paying, we're expecting Hojlund to be even better, hpefully before he hits 25.
Where has the extra 3m come from you scoundrel.
 
I’d much rather spunk this money on an exciting young prospect than on Toney, call me crazy. Toney is good but for money it would take, I don’t think he’s that special?

Depends how long you think ETH has if the goals don’t start coming immediately - from whoever he signs.

Most managers last about 3-4 years, and big club managers often less.

So blowing your entire striker budget on expensive ‘potential for the future’ is risky in the sense that, if the signing takes, say, 2 years to start banging, at what point does another CF get brought in to relieve pressure on the manager? Cuz that’s what would happen in such a scenario.

Then you have the 65m potential on the bench, and you’d have to wonder if it were wiser to simply sign a ready to rock CF in the first place.

When people talk about ‘one for the future’ they seem to forget that in order for the current manager in any top club to have a future, success in the present is essential.

And that’s why, while signing players with potential is fecking great - blowing your entire budget on a key position (if that’s what’s happened) on ‘potential for the future’ is very risky indeed.

But you carry on.
 
Looks like a left footed Welbeck to me. Some decent hold up play but can’t shoot without falling over.
 
yet you want us to invest 90m+ in Ferguson, who is less proven than even Hojlund, add in the cheap option of an 80m Kane that you thought we should have easily done.

To be fair, Ferguson is at least as proven as Hojlund, probably more so.

On a different note, for those who are ok with Hojlund contributing 8 or so goals this season (and are positive about this transfer) where are you expecting us to finish in the league? For clarity, I don’t think that’s an unreasonable expectation but I think it has to be matched by an acceptance that 6th is fine this season.
 
One thing I’ve noticed is that he can be a bit left sided - something I don’t like much but maybe he links well with Rashford.
 
No one would complain if we were signing Haaland or even Toney at that price, because we know they are good. Hojlund is one of the highest rated young strikers in this summer, because he grew into his body two years ago. He was never highly rated in his youth. And he still looks like a flat track bully with okay scoring.
So you’ve picked the greatest striker of a generation who plays for city and ivan Toney

Haaland isn’t going from city to us, and would cost more than 60/70 mil
Toney has been banned for 8 month

Do you have a better realistic option we could of signed
 
Haaland would've cost £150m+ if not for his release clause at Dortmund.

Toney is 27 and has only played two seasons in the Premier League, and never in Europe. Not to mention he comes with baggage and is banned for half the season. He's far from a slam dunk. And he'd probably be more expensive too.
 
Depends how long you think ETH has if the goals don’t start coming immediately - from whoever he signs.

Most managers last about 3-4 years, and big club managers often less.

So blowing your entire striker budget on expensive ‘potential for the future’ is risky in the sense that, if the signing takes, say, 2 years to start banging, at what point does another CF get brought in to relieve pressure on the manager? Cuz that’s what would happen in such a scenario.

Then you have the 65m potential on the bench, and you’d have to wonder if it were wiser to simply sign a ready to rock CF in the first place.

When people talk about ‘one for the future’ they seem to forget that in order for the current manager in any top club to have a future, success in the present is essential.

And that’s why, while signing players with potential is fecking great - blowing your entire budget on a key position (if that’s what’s happened) on ‘potential for the future’ is very risky indeed.

But you carry on.
What "ready to rock" strikers are out there and realistically attainable? Toney is banned for half of the season. Kane and Osimhen are £100m+ forwards. The market isn't awash with established forwards.
 
Haaland would've cost £150m+ if not for his release clause at Dortmund.

Toney is 27 and has only played two seasons in the Premier League, and never in Europe. He's far from a slam dunk. And he'd probably be more expensive too.
He'd absolutely be more than £64m. And he's banned for half of the season! Who the feck knows if he'd be able to get up to speed in an entirely new setup and club following an extensive layoff halfway through the season? Hojlund is a risk, but Toney would be a nonsensical signing.
 
What "ready to rock" strikers are out there and realistically attainable? Toney is banned for half of the season. Kane and Osimhen are £100m+ forwards. The market isn't awash with established forwards.

And Toney has one particularly good statistical season at 27 years old and it includes 6 penalties. People could lean on the rest of his game but they could do the same with Hojlund.
 
This place :lol: :lol:

the club agree a fee for a player the manager clearly wants and was desperate to have.
Cafe “ too expensive” “ other options” money experts with better football understanding than ETH :lol::lol:
 
Truth is I didn't to bother with a response to you. But clearly you didn't take the time to understand what I was saying.

Where Liverpool spent on the likes of Salah, Firminho, Fabinho, Robertson and Mane - all of whom had performed well prior to their arrival and were known commodities. We were spending on Bailly, Herrera, Rojo, Daley Blind, Fred, Lindelof and Telles. We also persisted with having these players in and around our starting xi.

In 2017, we bought Mhiki for cheap at 24m due to his contract situation and got Ibra for free. That year, we partnered Pogba with Fellaini in midfield, had Smalling and Rojo in our defence, Young was our left back and Valencia was our right back.

In 2015, when we signed Di Maria. We played Smalling with Rojo and converted Valencia to our right back. Herrera didn't stamp himself as a figure in our midfield and Blind didn't have the quality to be our DM - both of whom were relatively obscure prior. Fellaini was still in our best xi.

Where City signed Debruyne, Sterling, Walker, Gundogan and Sane. We were doing all of this.
In addition, when Man City realized that signings like Danilo, Nolito etc, they quickly remidied the situation.
When they noticed Yaya Toure and Joe Hart were showing their age, they were replaced.
This summer, our transfer team did that with De Gea.

I don't need to check my claims, you just need to stop throwing random insults online. Like I said before, its rather tasteless and if you can't have a sensible conversation without doing that, I'd rather you not respond at all.
You know the Liverpool players you quoted were not bought in one season, right?

And I see you are convenientpy picking and choosing which of our transfers to take for your hypothesis.

And you are also applying judgment on their transfer success in hindsight. The reality is we have spent for more than one player per season. And have spent more than anyone, bar City (Arsenal are on us in the last 3 years).

It is obviously clear that what you're saying is based on your own opinion of players not the objective reality which is that we've bought players and spent plenty.
 
Depends on what you expect for 75m. He would guarantee you 15-20 PL goals for the next three four years. Special is subjective but for the money we are paying, we're expecting Hojlund to be even better, hpefully before he hits 25.
The word 'guarantee' is thrown about far too much on these boards.

Toney scored 20 Premier League goals once in his career, and 6 of those were penalties - he wouldn't be a penalty taker at United as long as Bruno is here. So he never scored 15 non-penalty goals in the Premier League and yet you guarantee he would score 15-20 for 3-4 years.
 
God I hope he'll be that great that everyone will eat their words. The agenda against United is horrific.
 
Really don’t care about the fee or anyone else’s pessimism. He’s a brilliant talent and I’m excited to see how he develops as hopefully the focal point of our attack for years to come.
He definitely looks to have the potential.
 
And Toney has one particularly good statistical season at 27 years old and it includes 6 penalties. People could lean on the rest of his game but they could do the same with Hojlund.

if the fee is reasonable, and that's a big if, this would be a wise move on our part as he's a big athletic guy who would fit well into EtH's system
 
What "ready to rock" strikers are out there and realistically attainable? Toney is banned for half of the season. Kane and Osimhen are £100m+ forwards. The market isn't awash with established forwards.

So to begin with, I think Kane was absolutely gettable for a big fee.

That would’ve given ETH 2 years of a top, top CF at his peak and thus would buy ETH that future everyone’s going on about.

It would almost certainly also guarantee the club trophies, which is nice.

Then trust the scouts to actually do their job and find some cheap ‘potential for the future’ to act as back up to the PL proven goal scorer. Or possibly bring back MG as back up, which will cost nothing.

Again - in order for a manager to have a future at a big club, success in the present is needed. This is just the reality whether we like it or not.

And IF another striker isn’t brought in this window, or if MG isn’t returned, then those hoping for Højlund to have a nice, breezy, ‘pressure free’ few seasons to ‘develop and find his feet’ are in for a fecking rude awakening, because he will be the first choice 9 for Man Utd and will need to deliver on the pitch now.

I personally think ETH is planning on bringing back MG to rotate with Højlund because if not he’s basically risking his job on this, and with the Højlund fee, I’m not sure I see another striker being bought.
 
If he struggled to win physical duels against Smalling then the PL is gonna be a rude awakening for him

 
Depends how long you think ETH has if the goals don’t start coming immediately - from whoever he signs.

Most managers last about 3-4 years, and big club managers often less.

So blowing your entire striker budget on expensive ‘potential for the future’ is risky in the sense that, if the signing takes, say, 2 years to start banging, at what point does another CF get brought in to relieve pressure on the manager? Cuz that’s what would happen in such a scenario.

Then you have the 65m potential on the bench, and you’d have to wonder if it were wiser to simply sign a ready to rock CF in the first place.

When people talk about ‘one for the future’ they seem to forget that in order for the current manager in any top club to have a future, success in the present is essential.

And that’s why, while signing players with potential is fecking great - blowing your entire budget on a key position (if that’s what’s happened) on ‘potential for the future’ is very risky indeed.

But you carry on.
What you state here is very true, there isn't much patience or time in football in general.

But what this really demonstrates to me is that ETH doesn't make decisions by fear. He's not fearing the worst or worrying purely about a short term result in the way you're mentioning. He's making what he thinks is the best decision overall. To me that's a valuable asset for a football club like us where we do have budgets and we do have to build, not everything can or will be ready made.

He's shown he'll buy ready made when he believes it's the best option (Casemiro) so he's not one dimensional in his thought processes. But if he looks at the market and thinks the best thing for the football club is a young player he is clearly not shirking that either. It's not a decision somebody like Mourinho would make, but Mourinho was never a Manchester United manager and we saw how his decision making and thinking worked out.
 
The word 'guarantee' is thrown about far too much on these boards.

Toney scored 20 Premier League goals once in his career, and 6 of those were penalties - he wouldn't be a penalty taker at United as long as Bruno is here. So he never scored 15 non-penalty goals in the Premier League and yet you guarantee he would score 15-20 for 3-4 years.

We had the same thinking. It's kind of strange how a significantly older player with a relatively dubious past as a scorer is seen as a better investment when he isn't statistically better. Even if you were to downgrade Serie A goals by half, Toney wouldn't be that good of a gamble because his previous season was one where he registered 12 goals including 5 penalties. You need to have a lot of faith on his growth post 27 years old in order to justify a high fee.
 
Depends on what you expect for 75m. He would guarantee you 15-20 PL goals for the next three four years.
Of course not, if he doesn’t take penalties. And there are no doubts that Hojlund will be scoring more non-penalty goals than Toney
 
To be fair, Ferguson is at least as proven as Hojlund, probably more so.

On a different note, for those who are ok with Hojlund contributing 8 or so goals this season (and are positive about this transfer) where are you expecting us to finish in the league? For clarity, I don’t think that’s an unreasonable expectation but I think it has to be matched by an acceptance that 6th is fine this season.
Based on what?

Ferguson scored 10 goals and 3 assists in all comps playing about 1300 mins, ok some of those goals were in the PL, but he looked really raw, and would have commanded way bigger fee from Brighton given they are losing Caicedo and McAllister. I suspect we could not have got him unless we offered stupid money, my bottom would be 90m, and I think Brighton turn it down, I like him, but I doubt he is for sale.

I think if he scored 10 goals we would be in the top 4, lets not forget we had wout for most of the season, surely his finishing and hold up play has to be better than that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.