Cassidy
No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 32,942
Feel free to put me on mute.Now do us all a favour and stop posting alltogether.
Feel free to put me on mute.Now do us all a favour and stop posting alltogether.
Don't compare that. Haaland was already a goalscoring freak at that stageHow old was Haaland? How many goals did he score at age 19/20?
I suppose they’ll stop when people accept the fee and decide to wait and see how the boy does.The funny thing is this thread has now become toxic by moaners moaning at anyone who says its overpayment.
They're so busy having a whinge down a rabbit hole they don't realise what they're doing anymore
We have a good right to ask why we didn’t sign Haaland on 2 separate occasions when we had the chance
Yeah I'm already there. My excitement for an actual striker is too rifeI suppose they’ll stop when people accept the fee and decide to wait and see how the boy does.
Its just the start. He is Uniteds new CF he is going to be scrutinised and compared to the best. That comes with playing for United.What is the point of this tweet?
There was no release clause issue when he signed for Salzburg over UnitedThe release clauses apparently were a reason.
Haaland is a freak. Nobody should be compared to him. It's just setting the lad up to fail.Young, blonde, scandinavian striker signed for a Manchester club for a lot of money.
Haaland was 21 when Man City signed him, this chap is 20.
Of course they're going to be compared, however unfair that is on your new guy.
Well, I'd say we should have been the right club for Halaand!I think you are right, after his Dortmund experience he probably wanted to sign for a team that could win trophies. The times he was recommended to us before, I think he was mainly looking for a place where he could get as much playing time as possible, so we were the wrong career move for him at that stage as well. People often act as if all we have to do is want a player and we will sign them, but a lot of talent these days has people who are deliberately planning their next career moves to make sure they get the best chance to develop and it feels like at no stage in Haaland's career have we been the right club for him.
If you are Uniteds no1 striker you will be compared with the best.Haaland is a freak. Nobody should be compared to him. It's just setting the lad up to fail.
The fanbase needs to be patient with him. We've invested in the potential. He's not gonna be the finished article straight away.
There was no release clause issue when he signed for Salzburg over United
Feck me you are right. Generational talent.Don't compare that. Haaland was already a goalscoring freak at that stage
Since you said clauses and not clause I assumed you meant both occasions…. But yes Daffy Duck etc when you’re not being clearWell I've answered half your whine but true to form you only see the unanswered bit. There's a whole bunch of you on the Caf that remind me of Daffy Duck, with one tiny raincloud just over each of you, pissing it down while the sun shines on everyone else.
why the hell are they comparing hm to Halaand? Sad to say, but pretty much no one comapares/will compare to Halaand. The closest you might get is if you mix a young Zlatan with Kane of RvN!Its not even official yet and already getting this shite.
Jesus wept
As has been stated before, people are happiest when they’re moaning like feck at things. How about trusting the manager instead of this cynical pish.Wasnt the Caf mantra a couple of summers ago -- '' I dont give a feck how much we spend as long as the cnuts aka Glazers don't get a cent of it.''
So why the sudden change?
You're not wrong, but there needs to be context in the comparisons. Hojlund doesn't compare to Haaland. It's stupid to compare them. If we were signing Oshimen and people wanted to compare stats, that would be fair enough.If you are Uniteds no1 striker you will be compared with the best.
I’m not falling for your reverse psychology you scouser scum.Anyway on a positive note I like his attributes. Been a long time since we had a CF who likes being in the 6 yard box. Hope he does well
Either we get another forward or he must be coming back. Even then, hes been out for 18 months, hes going to he rustyNot sure this guy is going to get us 20 league goals, we need Bruno to return to his goal-scoring form of his first six months and Rashford to keep close to where he was last season if we are going to score enough goals... unless "he who can't be named" is allowed back into the fold...
As has been mentioned Dortmund allowed him to have a low buyout clause in his contract, no way we would allow that to happen. Also he got game time at both those clubs. We would likely not be able to guarantee that. The likes of Cavani is such a typical Woodward signing.Not sure on the Salzburg year. Dortmund I think possibly Cavani
Stupid or not. This is what it means to be a United CF. This club is massive, hopefully this kid has a strong character, he certainly seems like he is mentality strongYou're not wrong, but there needs to be context in the comparisons. Hojlund doesn't compare to Haaland. It's stupid to compare them. If we were signing Oshimen and people wanted to compare stats, that would be fair enough.
Its quite clear the issue was the club and the fact Oles position was tenuous at best rather than the league. We were a mess at the time, pretty sure had it been now he would chose us
That's the thing. Haaland gets lots of goals for City, but other players scored for them as well. We need a goal return from other players.Not sure this guy is going to get us 20 league goals, we need Bruno to return to his goal-scoring form of his first six months and Rashford to keep close to where he was last season if we are going to score enough goals... unless "he who can't be named" is allowed back into the fold...
That said, it's nice to have someone who wants to be at OT so much, memories of Ruud, and he has to be an upgrade on Anthony Permanently Injured
Come on. He was regularly scoring in the UCL against big clubs and we had a massive whole at CF in the team. We would likely not be able to guarantee that.
My post is not about Woodward. Its about where the club was and its struggle to convince players to come. We were going backwards at the time, with a manager who looked out of its depth. We missed out on more than just HaalandIn my opinion, people are too hell-bent on blaming Woodward and his staff for everything that has or hasn't happened over the last few years, and I can sort of understand that because I don't think they were completely incompetent and out of their depth. The point I'm trying to make is that even if we had the best scouting and recruitment team in the world, some signings still wouldn't happen because players and their advisors simply have different ideas about what is best for a player's development.
Since you said clauses and not clause I assumed you meant both occasions…. But yes Daffy Duck etc when you’re not being clear
There was no release clause issue when he signed for Salzburg over United
Again go back to the reported missed meeting after the agreement of a dealWhen he signed for Salzburg he had been scouted by and gathered interest from United, Juventus, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Atlético Madrid, Manchester City, Arsenal, Bayern Munich and Chelsea. It's almost like he joined a club where he was guaranteed a game. Or else all of the club's above lack your genius.
Again go back to the reported missed meeting after the agreement of a deal
Lead the line? Who said that?You'd be okay with signing a 17 year old striker who had scored 12 goals in the Norwegian league to lead the line for us? Most non-Norwegians hadn't heard of him before Salzburg.
He signed for Dortmund because it's a great club to develop and they allowed a reasonable release clause in case top clubs came calling for him, which they inevitably did. We haven't been a top club for years.
I know that, but we do stupid things at this club at times. He might have played all the time, but we had to sign him in the first place and if we didn't guarantee him that then he wouldn't come. Sometimes you have to smooth talk players. Guarantee them the earth.Come on. He was regularly scoring in the UCL against big clubs and we had a massive whole at CF in the team
Lead the line? Who said that?
The report is we had agreed a 4m transfer and missed the meeting with the club
Its Bellingham all over againI know that, but we do stupid things at this club at times. He might have played all the time, but we had to sign him in the first place and if we didn't guarantee him that then he wouldn't come. Sometimes you have to smooth talk players. Guarantee them the earth.
I don’t believe a club like United are not smart enough to sign a 17 year old and loan them out. I also don’t know if the report is true but it seems a wild one to completely make up.If he wasn't going to lead the line, then he'd not get the play time he needed and wanted. He and his dad have been very smart with his development in mind.
Surely you don't believe that. Mixed time zones? That is some typical awful journalism.
Probably missed it all in fairness, but has many really defended the fee? I think you’d need to be blind or oblivious not to think we’ve overpaid. I guess my angle is I’d rather overpay by a few million (5-10m on this deal?) and get our targets in early, then let this dither until season starts.See if a lot of posters blindly defending the fee as though it represented objective fair value would have just said this instead, there wouldn't be pages of disagreement.
If he wasn't going to lead the line, then he'd not get the play time he needed and wanted. He and his dad have been very smart with his development in mind.
Surely you don't believe that. Mixed time zones? That is some typical awful journalism.
My post is not about Woodward. Its about where the club was and its struggle to convince players to come. We were going backwards at the time, with a manager who looked out of its depth. We missed out on more than just Haaland