Rasmus Højlund | Signed for United

Status
Not open for further replies.
The funny thing is this thread has now become toxic by moaners moaning at anyone who says its overpayment.

They're so busy having a whinge down a rabbit hole they don't realise what they're doing anymore :lol:
I suppose they’ll stop when people accept the fee and decide to wait and see how the boy does.
 
What is the point of this tweet? :lol:
Its just the start. He is Uniteds new CF he is going to be scrutinised and compared to the best. That comes with playing for United.
 
Couldn't give a feck about the price. We've got a striker! Let's. Fecking. Go!

Good luck to the lad and all of our new signings. It's another step forward.
 
Young, blonde, scandinavian striker signed for a Manchester club for a lot of money.

Haaland was 21 when Man City signed him, this chap is 20.

Of course they're going to be compared, however unfair that is on your new guy.
Haaland is a freak. Nobody should be compared to him. It's just setting the lad up to fail.

The fanbase needs to be patient with him. We've invested in the potential. He's not gonna be the finished article straight away.
 
I think you are right, after his Dortmund experience he probably wanted to sign for a team that could win trophies. The times he was recommended to us before, I think he was mainly looking for a place where he could get as much playing time as possible, so we were the wrong career move for him at that stage as well. People often act as if all we have to do is want a player and we will sign them, but a lot of talent these days has people who are deliberately planning their next career moves to make sure they get the best chance to develop and it feels like at no stage in Haaland's career have we been the right club for him.
Well, I'd say we should have been the right club for Halaand!
 
Haaland is a freak. Nobody should be compared to him. It's just setting the lad up to fail.

The fanbase needs to be patient with him. We've invested in the potential. He's not gonna be the finished article straight away.
If you are Uniteds no1 striker you will be compared with the best.
 
Anyway on a positive note I like his attributes. Been a long time since we had a CF who likes being in the 6 yard box. Hope he does well
 
There was no release clause issue when he signed for Salzburg over United


Well I've answered half your whine but true to form you only see the unanswered bit. There's a whole bunch of you on the Caf that remind me of Daffy Duck, with one tiny raincloud just over each of you, pissing it down while the sun shines on everyone else.
 
Well I've answered half your whine but true to form you only see the unanswered bit. There's a whole bunch of you on the Caf that remind me of Daffy Duck, with one tiny raincloud just over each of you, pissing it down while the sun shines on everyone else.
Since you said clauses and not clause I assumed you meant both occasions…. But yes Daffy Duck etc when you’re not being clear
 
Its not even official yet and already getting this shite.
Jesus wept
why the hell are they comparing hm to Halaand? Sad to say, but pretty much no one comapares/will compare to Halaand. The closest you might get is if you mix a young Zlatan with Kane of RvN!
 
Wasnt the Caf mantra a couple of summers ago -- '' I dont give a feck how much we spend as long as the cnuts aka Glazers don't get a cent of it.''

So why the sudden change?
As has been stated before, people are happiest when they’re moaning like feck at things. How about trusting the manager instead of this cynical pish.
 
Not sure this guy is going to get us 20 league goals, we need Bruno to return to his goal-scoring form of his first six months and Rashford to keep close to where he was last season if we are going to score enough goals... unless "he who can't be named" is allowed back into the fold...

That said, it's nice to have someone who wants to be at OT so much, memories of Ruud, and he has to be an upgrade on Anthony Permanently Injured
 
If you are Uniteds no1 striker you will be compared with the best.
You're not wrong, but there needs to be context in the comparisons. Hojlund doesn't compare to Haaland. It's stupid to compare them. If we were signing Oshimen and people wanted to compare stats, that would be fair enough.
 
Anyway on a positive note I like his attributes. Been a long time since we had a CF who likes being in the 6 yard box. Hope he does well
I’m not falling for your reverse psychology you scouser scum.

But yes, he scores his goals mostly from inside the box. And he is strong and freakishly fast.
 
Not sure this guy is going to get us 20 league goals, we need Bruno to return to his goal-scoring form of his first six months and Rashford to keep close to where he was last season if we are going to score enough goals... unless "he who can't be named" is allowed back into the fold...
Either we get another forward or he must be coming back. Even then, hes been out for 18 months, hes going to he rusty
 
Not sure on the Salzburg year. Dortmund I think possibly Cavani
As has been mentioned Dortmund allowed him to have a low buyout clause in his contract, no way we would allow that to happen. Also he got game time at both those clubs. We would likely not be able to guarantee that. The likes of Cavani is such a typical Woodward signing.
 
You're not wrong, but there needs to be context in the comparisons. Hojlund doesn't compare to Haaland. It's stupid to compare them. If we were signing Oshimen and people wanted to compare stats, that would be fair enough.
Stupid or not. This is what it means to be a United CF. This club is massive, hopefully this kid has a strong character, he certainly seems like he is mentality strong
 
Its quite clear the issue was the club and the fact Oles position was tenuous at best rather than the league. We were a mess at the time, pretty sure had it been now he would chose us

In my opinion, people are too hell-bent on blaming Woodward and his staff for everything that has or hasn't happened over the last few years, and I can sort of understand that because I don't think they were completely incompetent and out of their depth. The point I'm trying to make is that even if we had the best scouting and recruitment team in the world, some signings still wouldn't happen because players and their advisors simply have different ideas about what is best for a player's development.
 
Not sure this guy is going to get us 20 league goals, we need Bruno to return to his goal-scoring form of his first six months and Rashford to keep close to where he was last season if we are going to score enough goals... unless "he who can't be named" is allowed back into the fold...

That said, it's nice to have someone who wants to be at OT so much, memories of Ruud, and he has to be an upgrade on Anthony Permanently Injured
That's the thing. Haaland gets lots of goals for City, but other players scored for them as well. We need a goal return from other players.
 
In my opinion, people are too hell-bent on blaming Woodward and his staff for everything that has or hasn't happened over the last few years, and I can sort of understand that because I don't think they were completely incompetent and out of their depth. The point I'm trying to make is that even if we had the best scouting and recruitment team in the world, some signings still wouldn't happen because players and their advisors simply have different ideas about what is best for a player's development.
My post is not about Woodward. Its about where the club was and its struggle to convince players to come. We were going backwards at the time, with a manager who looked out of its depth. We missed out on more than just Haaland
 
Since you said clauses and not clause I assumed you meant both occasions…. But yes Daffy Duck etc when you’re not being clear

When he signed for Salzburg he had been scouted by and gathered interest from United, Juventus, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Atlético Madrid, Manchester City, Arsenal, Bayern Munich and Chelsea. It's almost like he joined a club where he was guaranteed a game. Or else all of the club's above lack your genius.
 
There was no release clause issue when he signed for Salzburg over United

You'd be okay with signing a 17 year old striker who had scored 12 goals in the Norwegian league to lead the line for us? Most non-Norwegians hadn't heard of him before Salzburg.

He signed for Dortmund because it's a great club to develop and they allowed a reasonable release clause in case top clubs came calling for him, which they inevitably did. We haven't been a top club for years.
 
When he signed for Salzburg he had been scouted by and gathered interest from United, Juventus, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Atlético Madrid, Manchester City, Arsenal, Bayern Munich and Chelsea. It's almost like he joined a club where he was guaranteed a game. Or else all of the club's above lack your genius.
Again go back to the reported missed meeting after the agreement of a deal
 
You'd be okay with signing a 17 year old striker who had scored 12 goals in the Norwegian league to lead the line for us? Most non-Norwegians hadn't heard of him before Salzburg.

He signed for Dortmund because it's a great club to develop and they allowed a reasonable release clause in case top clubs came calling for him, which they inevitably did. We haven't been a top club for years.
Lead the line? Who said that?
The report is we had agreed a 4m transfer and missed the meeting with the club
 
I’m opening this thread to hear about any rumors about his medical and signings and all I’m getting is negativity and some non-Hojlund chat. Common guys, let’s keep this about his transfer completion build up and we can start discussing about him once he’s here. We’ve over analyzed him from every angle.
 
Come on. He was regularly scoring in the UCL against big clubs and we had a massive whole at CF in the team
I know that, but we do stupid things at this club at times. He might have played all the time, but we had to sign him in the first place and if we didn't guarantee him that then he wouldn't come. Sometimes you have to smooth talk players. Guarantee them the earth.
 
Lead the line? Who said that?
The report is we had agreed a 4m transfer and missed the meeting with the club

If he wasn't going to lead the line, then he'd not get the play time he needed and wanted. He and his dad have been very smart with his development in mind.

Surely you don't believe that. Mixed time zones? That is some typical awful journalism.
 
I know that, but we do stupid things at this club at times. He might have played all the time, but we had to sign him in the first place and if we didn't guarantee him that then he wouldn't come. Sometimes you have to smooth talk players. Guarantee them the earth.
Its Bellingham all over again
 
If he wasn't going to lead the line, then he'd not get the play time he needed and wanted. He and his dad have been very smart with his development in mind.

Surely you don't believe that. Mixed time zones? That is some typical awful journalism.
I don’t believe a club like United are not smart enough to sign a 17 year old and loan them out. I also don’t know if the report is true but it seems a wild one to completely make up.
 
See if a lot of posters blindly defending the fee as though it represented objective fair value would have just said this instead, there wouldn't be pages of disagreement.
Probably missed it all in fairness, but has many really defended the fee? I think you’d need to be blind or oblivious not to think we’ve overpaid. I guess my angle is I’d rather overpay by a few million (5-10m on this deal?) and get our targets in early, then let this dither until season starts.

This is all under the assumption that we got the guy in we wanted (and needed!), assuming the Kane deal was nigh on impossible of course. There just didn’t seem to be that many relevant options available in the market who was going to be cheaper and/or a better fit. Exciting times. Hopefully he can kick on from here.
 
If he wasn't going to lead the line, then he'd not get the play time he needed and wanted. He and his dad have been very smart with his development in mind.

Surely you don't believe that. Mixed time zones? That is some typical awful journalism.


If it can be a negative against United people use the flimsiest of reports and the highest figures and lowest stats. In the good old days that nonsense was the job of tabloid journalists and oppo fans.
 
My post is not about Woodward. Its about where the club was and its struggle to convince players to come. We were going backwards at the time, with a manager who looked out of its depth. We missed out on more than just Haaland

Like I said, I doubt he would have joined us even if we were in a stable position because the step up in the league was too high. Remember Dortmund didn't have a free run at him, there were a lot of top teams chasing him at the time and he chose to take a gradual step up to a team that had a reputation for giving young players playing time and not yet going to the highest level.

At the end of the day, we don't know what really happened and we can speculate all day about why it didn't happen, it's no use, he'll never be a United player and we're in the wrong thread discussing why we missed out on Haaland.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.