SAFMUTD
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2018
- Messages
- 11,787
Didn't knew that. That's changes allMacAllister had a release clause and Trossard had 6 months left on his contract. So his fee was actually quite high in context.
Didn't knew that. That's changes allMacAllister had a release clause and Trossard had 6 months left on his contract. So his fee was actually quite high in context.
Could you elaborate more on this mate? Would be very interesting imo.
I see. Thanks a lot mate.Sure. When Gasparini gives him minutes he runs channels a lot; so he finds himself out wide receiving the ball in transition and quite often isolated and not always in optimal areas to get high percentage shots in the box. This also accounts for compilation videos showing him losing the ball surrounded by the opposition. Ten Hag, by contrast, had someone like Haller and Wout occupying the centre and holding their position to play off the midfielders. Under Ten Hag he'll find himself in the kind of areas he finds himself in when he plays with the Danish national team, which incidentally, finds Hojlund more prolific and in dangerous areas to score.
Have you seen it out there?Some of you need to go outside and get some sun and fresh air.
Have you seen it out there?
Kane isn't just a question of money. Reports after reports have said Levy won't sell to a rival. Oshimen is valued at 170m. When you don't have options, you develop one, that's what all great coaches do. And right now, we don't have options.
I don't think this analysis really changes irrespective of whether we buy Hojlund or any other striker that is realistic at present.
It's the same for many teams around Europe, you don't really want to suffer an injury to your best player and if they do it becomes a struggle. If they were easy to replace they wouldn't be that good. I don't see any striker we could get that would leave me comfortable if Rashford is out for a whole season.
First you didn't answer my question about the made up stuffs?
Second I criticised him because he didn't score not because his teammates scored the goals themselves. In fact I don't even get the logic of this question or what you wanted to say.
Third it's you who started criticising another poster calling his logic absurd without providing a single detail in the match to support your opinion. Now as that logic seems fine enough you started to go for the match details? Oh how convenient. Just stop moving the goal posts mate.
Tbh I really hate discussing things with any poster who dodge the real question and try moving the goal posts once they lost their point. It's just stupid and pointless so please don't quote me anymore. Anyway don't forget to contact @Amadaeus you two would make some really good friend I reckon.
That's fine but some players just have playing habits that are really difficult to eradicate. Like undoubtedly a coach has told Martial that he needs to start making runs into the box and between cbs rather than dropping deep or into wider areas but he never does it. Coaches must have told De Gea over time that he needs to start coming off his line for crosses or to sweep balls away but he never did it. No guarantee that a change in coach will mean Hojlund starts running between the CBs rather than in the channels between CBs and FBs.Sure. When Gasparini gives him minutes he runs channels a lot; so he finds himself out wide receiving the ball in transition and quite often isolated and not always in optimal areas to get high percentage shots in the box. This also accounts for compilation videos showing him losing the ball surrounded by the opposition. Ten Hag, by contrast, had someone like Haller and Wout occupying the centre and holding their position to play off the midfielders. Under Ten Hag he'll find himself in the kind of areas he finds himself in when he plays with the Danish national team, which incidentally, finds Hojlund more prolific and in dangerous areas to score.
Didn’t he say that a week ago?
He is a tweet whore, why anyone believes a fecking thing he says as gospel is beyond me. Yes he has a few connections but he literally had to apologise a few years ago for whoring other people info. How he is still deemed level 1 is beyond me.
I would put more faith in my grans tea leaves.
That's the point isn't it? Kane is the obvious answer and he'd slot in and guarantee goals - but the club can't afford him.
Obviously Ten Hag thinks he can develop him into a goal scorer, but my point is that I can see why some fans are concerned if the club buys another young project player, given the big money spent on similar players who haven't been good enough.
He is a tweet whore, why anyone believes a fecking thing he says as gospel is beyond me. Yes he has a few connections but he literally had to apologise a few years ago for whoring other people info. How he is still deemed level 1 is beyond me.
I would put more faith in my grans tea leaves.
For 100-120 he would. He has sold us players before.Levy wouldn't sell us Kane. Our ownership issue is irrelevant.
Were you getting this opinion from? If anything his stats state the exact opposite of your postSure. When Gasparini gives him minutes he runs channels a lot; so he finds himself out wide receiving the ball in transition and quite often isolated and not always in optimal areas to get high percentage shots in the box. This also accounts for compilation videos showing him losing the ball surrounded by the opposition. Ten Hag, by contrast, had someone like Haller and Wout occupying the centre and holding their position to play off the midfielders. Under Ten Hag he'll find himself in the kind of areas he finds himself in when he plays with the Danish national team, which incidentally, finds Hojlund more prolific and in dangerous areas to score.
Calm down mate. It’s a football chat where someone has a slightly differing opinion to yourself.
No need for personal insults.
For 100-120 he would. He has sold us players before.
This lad is raw with clear potential but he can't be our main striker signing for the summer, would like to think Ten Hag has got a classic centre forward lined up before the window closes.
Muani isn't a proper CF though, and he wouldn't be cheap either.If PSG are in for him and Bayern are in for Kane then that gives us a free run at Muani so we should get him at a lower price as we would be the only interested party...it is a win win situation.
That is of course if we believe the bullshite.
He plays as a CF for his club and his national team and they are not too shabbyMuani isn't a proper CF though, and he wouldn't be cheap either.
If this guy costs north of £60m I find it hard to see us spending that much on a back up player, as Kane it the type (and cost profile) that would expect to be starting every PL and CL game he is available for.Could we see a scenario where we sign both
Glazers sell to Jassim tomorrow morning.Could we see a scenario where we sign both
Could we see a scenario where we sign both