Ben foster thinks we should have spent an extra 30m and got Harry Kane.
These pundits don't have a clue. An ounce of brain power would tell you it's not a simple case of "spend an extra 30mill and get Harry Kane." Let's chalk it up to what it really is, they hate the fact United bought a Danish player because good old English British Harry Kane was right there for the taking... little problem with that though.
How many times must it be reported that;
A) Levy
does not want to sell Harry Kane
B) Levy (if he was forced to sell lets say)
especially does not want to sell Harry Kane to a Premier League team
C) Levy does not want to sell Harry Kane for a reasonable amount of money (100+ million minimum easily)
D) Bayern Munich have just seen an offer of over 100mill pounds (including bonuses) turned down
D+) Levy would rather sell to a club like Bayern Munich for cheaper than a club like United for more money (and again, their bid was turned down)
E) Harry Kane is after obscene wages
F) The total financial package for Hojlund over his contract is miniscule compared to the total financial package for Harry Kane over a contract (the difference between about 8 mill to 30mill or something like this) severely affecting our financial power considering FFP.
G) Harry Kane is 30 years old, Hojlund is 20, i'm sorry but this is a big factor regardless of how good Kane is
There's more
But no no it's just "pay a little more and get Kane." These people get paid for these opinions by the way, so stupid. Braindead.