You don't need to go further back than the Brentford game where Højlund made an exquisite touch before chipping it over the goalkeeper and scoring. He doesn't have loose touches constantly throughout the game.
I guess the point I'm making by bringing Gyokeres (and other strikers) into this is to show that your emotional attachment to United is probably making you exaggerate his weaknesses. Every striker has loose touches every now and then. You don't think much of it when Haaland or Gyokeres does it because you don't really care, whereas when Højlund does it, you get annoyed and begin to think it is a weakness, and confuse it for inconsistency.
But yes, this team should not be relying on a 21 year old to lead the line. Maybe he is ready in 2-3 years, but he has a lot of work to do. I just think he has a bigger ceiling than a lot in here seem to think, and I'm patient with him because I find his skill set to be quite complete for such a young striker other than his aerial ability, and confident he will be a class striker in a few years. He is after all one of the highest rated young strikers, even if there are very few of them these days.
I disagree, buddy. One or two good instances haven't convinced me that he is ever going to become an answer as a first choice. However, I think he can be a very solid #2 to come late in games against tired defenses or as a reliever for the main striker in cup games etc. But I guess time will tell. May be I'll be proven wrong and he improves enough to become a top player.