Zirkzee isn't rubbish.He's so bad...
Hojlund 70m
Zirkzee 40m
Antony 80m
Mount 65m
£250m spent on absolute rubbish
And that's why we are in a hole both financially and attacking wise.He's so bad...
Hojlund 70m
Zirkzee 40m
Antony 80m
Mount 65m
£250m spent on absolute rubbish
Zirkzee deserves another season, he's clearly got so much more to his game.He's so bad...
Hojlund 70m
Zirkzee 40m
Antony 80m
Mount 65m
£250m spent on absolute rubbish
I mean he's clearly got physical gifts, very good straight line speed. Doesn't mean he knows where to run thoughCan he, he didn't beat a player, or run into a scoring position.
One of the players in terms of first touch I have ever seen at United. If he ain't running with space, he's fecking tragic
How exactly Hojlund making that point? Because he scored 2 goals against Plzen as a sub? When else he had impact from the bench?Unfortunately both Hojlund and Zirkzee are making the point of being good options from the bench.
We really need a first team ST.
Don't know how you could watch that game and conclude that Zirkzee was rubbish. 40m for a young striker is really not that bad either. And it's not even 40 if you're comparing to Hojlund. It was 40m euro, £35m, Hojlund was £70m I believe.He's so bad...
Hojlund 70m
Zirkzee 40m
Antony 80m
Mount 65m
£250m spent on absolute rubbish
Most people on here don't actually play football.It amazes me how little some expect from a striker.
People ask why he doesn't get passes and ignore the obvious answer that is staring them in the face, because his teammates know his touch is shit, they pass to Zirkzee just fine.
A striker who can actually play and be involved in the general play positively makes a massive difference to overall attacking cohesion and Utd should not be looking at one dimensional strikers.
The real worrying thing about this one is it's against the de facto worst team in the league against the worst CB's and he can't shake them with any frequency at all. He made a few clean breaks and should have had an assist, but that's not enough for a PL striker, let alone a United one.Yeah I don't think he would stand out in the championship. What the feck did we spend so much money on, my god. He can't receive a pass under the slightest bit of pressure.
When was that? I missed the game against some U14 team?So weird how some games his hold up play is decent, but other times he makes Lukaku look like prime R9
Was going by the entire season not just todayDon't know how you could watch that game and conclude that Zirkzee was rubbish. 40m for a young striker is really not that bad either. And it's not even 40 if you're comparing to Hojlund. It was 40m euro, £35m, Hojlund was £70m I believe.
He is awful with his back to goal. Defenders get tight to him and he can't keep it under pressure. Despite being a strong lad any touch from a defender puts him off balance and he can't do anything.He would do well at an Everton. I maintain he does have some good attributes, he's very strong and is good playing with his back to goal. He is not mobile enough to excel in this system. Zirkzee should start ahead of him.
We can get 40-50 million euros easily for him. But if we sell him on time (this summer).Its not surprising we look so shit with him on the pitch, it's like playing with 10 min from the first minute. Sell him for 10m.
Don't remind me.....that hurts a lot.I can not believe him and Isak cost almost the same.
He doesn’t get in the right positions enough to even be a tap in merchant.Hard to see what his strengths are. He needs to be in a team like City as a tap in merchant. Disastrous season from him so far.